Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:30:50.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 1: The Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (Firi)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dating is universally used as an essential dating tool in the archaeological and earth (Quaternary) sciences. The technique has enjoyed considerable success with ongoing developments in both the sophistication of experimental practice and an ever-widening range of applications. Most recently (since the 1980s), a new generation of laboratories has been created, based on the exploitation of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) for the differentiation and measurement of carbon isotope abundances in natural materials. Worldwide, there are over 100 14C laboratories now operational in universities, research organizations, museums, and as commercial enterprises. There is an inevitable diversity of experimental approaches and applied priorities within these facilities. Some are well established, while others are relatively recent members of the international 14C community. Consequently, as a group, the laboratories reflect to varying extents the progress achieved over several decades of experience and methodological options. Furthermore, since progress in archaeology and related earth sciences cannot respect geographical and/or present political boundaries, there has been, and continues to be, an inevitable consequence that sample materials from specific cultural contexts are submitted to different laboratories and at different times. In this situation, the issue of comparability between results and amongst laboratories becomes paramount. Users of the results from 14C dating are also concerned with the comparability and quality of laboratory results and the quality assurance programs that laboratories undertake are thus important in ensuring user confidence. The harmonization of measurements and the traceability of results to internationally recognized standards are also major goals of the program of work described in this special issue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona