Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:20:35.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Update on the Performance of the SUERC In Situ Cosmogenic 14C Extraction Line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R H Fülöp ,
P Naysmith ,
G T Cook ,
D Fabel ,
S Xu  and
P Bishop
R H Fülöp*
Affiliation:
Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland
P Naysmith
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland
G T Cook
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland
D Fabel
Affiliation:
Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
S Xu
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland
P Bishop
Affiliation:
Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
*
Corresponding author. Email: r.fulop@suerc.gla.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we describe improvements to the in situ cosmogenic radiocarbon extraction system at SUERC made since 2004, highlighting the factors that potentially control the reduction of analytical variability. We also present new results on system blanks and of measurements of in situ14C in shielded quartz and a surface quartz sample used at the University of Arizona as an in situ14C standard (PP-4). The SUERC in situ14C extraction system was built in 2001 and is based on a combustion technique following the design of the extraction system at the University of Arizona. Our preliminary results suggest that the continuous running of the extraction system and the monitoring of gas collecting time and of the temperature of the cryogenic traps used in the gas cleaning steps are key to maintaining low and stable system blanks. Our latest average system blank is 2.02 ± 0.23 x 10514C atoms. This is consistent with those recently published by the University of Arizona and ETH in situ14C labs. Measurements of in situ14C concentrations in sample PP-4 yield an average of 3.82 ± 0.23 x 105 atoms g–1 quartz, again consistent with published values.

Information

Type
Sample Preparation
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 3: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 1288 - 1294
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Chen, Y, Zentilli, M, Clark, A, Farrar, E, Grist, A, Willis-Richards, J. 1996. Geochronological evidence for post-Variscan cooling and uplift of the Carnmenellis granite, SW England. Journal of the Geological Society 153(2):191–5.Google Scholar
Donahue, DJ, Linick, TW, Jull, AJT. 1990. Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32(2):135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S, Bishop, P, Bryant, C, Cook, GT, Fallick, A, Harkness, D, Metcalfe, S, Scott, M, Scott, R, Summerfield, M. 2004. A new environmental sciences AMS laboratory in Scotland. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:31–4.Google Scholar
Hippe, K, Kober, F, Baur, H, Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Wieler, R. 2009. The current performance of the in situ 14C extraction line at ETH. Quaternary Geochronology 4(6):493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, C, Nishiizumi, K. 1992. Chemical isolation of quartz for measurement of in-situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56(9):3583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, NA. 1997. A new extraction technique and production rate estimate for in situ cosmogenic 14C in quartz [PhD dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Lifton, NA, Jull, AJT, Quade, J. 2001. A new extraction technique and production rate estimate for in situ cosmogenic 14C in quartz. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65(12):1953–69.Google Scholar
Maden, C, Anastasi, P, Dougans, D, Freeman, S, Kitchen, R, Klody, G, Schnabel, C, Sundquist, M, Vanner, K, Xu, S. 2007. SUERC AMS ion detection. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):131–9.Google Scholar
Miller, GH, Briner, JP, Lifton, NA, Finkel, RC. 2006. Limited ice-sheet erosion and complex in situ cosmogenic 10Be, 26Al, and 14C on Baffin Island, Arctic Canada. Quaternary Geochronology 1(1):74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naysmith, P, Cook, GT, Phillips, W, Lifton, NA, Anderson, R. 2004. Preliminary results for the extraction and measurement of cosmogenic in situ 14C from quartz. Radiocarbon 46(1):201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naysmith, P. 2007. Extraction and measurement of cosmogenic in situ 14C from quartz. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. 94 p.Google Scholar
Pigati, JS. 2004. Experimental developments and application of carbon-14 and in situ cosmogenic nuclide dating techniques [PhD dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar