INTRODUCTION
The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition marked a profound shift in socioeconomic patterns, which is represented in the archaeological record by stark changes in material culture and subsistence practices. The Neolithic brought a fundamental change in human lifestyle, reflected in the introduction of farming, new technology including pottery and ground stone artifacts, and distinctive forms of architecture and burial practice.
The nature and timing of the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition remains a much-debated topic in archaeology. Recent aDNA studies have shown that early farmers in central and southwestern Europe show a genetic affinity to populations in the Near East, with the implication that demographic expansion and migration played an important role in the appearance of the Neolithic in these regions, although an admixture with local foragers is also indicated (e.g. Haak et al. 2010; Olalde et al. 2015). Palaeogenetic research into the transition in the British Isles is less advanced and archaeological opinion is still divided over whether colonisation from mainland Europe (Sheridan 2010) or indigenous adoption (Thomas 2008) was the main driver of Neolithization.
Regardless of the eventual outcome of the debate over the nature and timing of the transition in the British Isles, it is pertinent that we seek answers to more detailed questions about human lifestyle at this key juncture in prehistory. The extent of dietary change associated with the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Scotland is one such question that remains controversial. Stable isotope analysis for dietary reconstruction has been employed to investigate these changes (Richards and Mellars 1998), but is constrained by the scarcity of Mesolithic human remains from Scotland. Evidence of a chronological overlap in Mesolithic and Neolithic lifestyles comes from the shell midden of Cnoc Coig, Oronsay, which is usually attributed to the Late Mesolithic. Charlton et al. (Reference Charlton, Alexander, Collins, Milner, Mellars, O’Connell, Stevens and Craig2016) used ZooMS, stable isotope analysis and radiocarbon (14C) dating to identify two human bones from the midden with stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values that reflect the consumption of a significant amount of marine protein, and 14C dates that overlap with those on human remains from other parts of western Scotland that exhibit more terrestrial diets (Richards and Sheridan 2000; Schulting and Richards 2002). These data could be interpreted to indicate that the Cnoc Coig individuals were Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who coexisted with agricultural communities. This highlights the fact that there is insufficient archaeological or other evidence to support a rapid and total abandonment of marine resources in the Early Neolithic, a point emphasized by Milner et al. (2004).
Several stable isotope and lipid biomarker studies have been used to argue for a rapid and permanent shift in Scotland from a diet rich in marine protein in the Mesolithic, to one wholly reliant on terrestrial resources in the Neolithic (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Schulting and Hedges2003; Richards and Schulting Reference Richards and Schulting2006; Cramp et al. Reference Cramp, Jones, Sheridan, Smyth, Whelton, Mulville, Sharples and Evershed2014). However, issues with using stable isotope analyses to detect potentially much more subtle changes in diet have been highlighted by Milner et al. (2004), Bonsall et al. (Reference Bonsall, Cook, Pickard, McSweeney and Bartosiewicz2009), and Charlton et al. (Reference Charlton, Alexander, Collins, Milner, Mellars, O’Connell, Stevens and Craig2016); namely that the use of linear interpolation between terrestrial and marine δ13C end-members to estimate marine resource consumption in humans has a large error of up to 20%, and that faunal baselines must be better defined when dealing with humans that may have consumed marine resources. The present study seeks to address both issues.
Our knowledge of the transition is somewhat hindered by the fact that δ13C and δ15N isotope analysis of bulk bone collagen is the most cost effective method of estimating individual diets, but the resolution is poor as it gives an average of food sources consumed over 5–10 years or more before the subject’s death, depending on which bone is sampled (Sealy et al. Reference Sealy, Armstrong and Schrire1995; Richards and Hedges Reference Richards and Hedges1999). In comparison, the incremental dentine method (Beaumont et al. 2013), which was employed by Montgomery et al. (Reference Montgomery, Beaumont, Jay, Keefe, Gledhill, Cook, Dockrill and Melton2013) to detect periodic returns to marine resources by Scottish Neolithic individuals, picks up relatively short-lived changes in eating habits, but only while the teeth are forming. Alternative approaches to reconstructing diet have been utilized in response to the issues associated with analyzing human bone collagen. For example, Cramp et al. (Reference Cramp, Jones, Sheridan, Smyth, Whelton, Mulville, Sharples and Evershed2014) used lipid biomarkers to detect dairy products in Neolithic pot sherds from the Outer Hebrides. In the absence of marine biomarkers, they concluded that dairying completely replaced fishing in the Neolithic. However, the technique can only inform on food cooked in pots (as opposed to on an open fire, for example) and cannot recreate the diet of individual people. Currently, the bulk bone collagen isotopic evidence of diet in the Neolithic in Scotland appears at odds with the archaeological evidence. δ13C and δ15N isotope measurements on human bone collagen have been interpreted as indicating an almost complete abandonment of marine resources (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Schulting and Hedges2003; Richards and Schulting Reference Richards and Schulting2006), yet Neolithic middens contain evidence of shellfish and fish consumption (Connock et al. Reference Connock, Finlayson and Mills1991). We must therefore seek to reconcile the isotopic and archaeological evidence.
The study of the transition from a nomadic hunter-gatherer-fisher lifestyle to sedentary farming in Scotland is greatly hampered by the scarcity of human and animal remains that survive in the archaeological record. Some dietary resources, such as shellfish are well represented, but the edible organic portion has either been consumed or totally degraded, leaving only the inorganic shells. Organic remains are vital for reconstructing ancient diets and subsistence practices, and for placing these in a secure chronological context. Issues surrounding human diet and lifestyle are particularly pressing in Scotland due to the coastal setting of many of the surviving sites: it is important that these particularly vulnerable sites are recorded and interpreted before they are lost to climate change and erosion.
The scarcity of suitable bone samples, resulting in unrepresentative dietary baselines in stable isotope studies, is not a problem that is unique to Scotland. Very few stable isotope studies take into account all available food sources when reconstructing diet because of the limited availability of samples to measure. Baselines are constructed from the faunal remains found on site but do not consider foods that may have been lost to degradation. Other studies use non-local faunal remains in an attempt to fill baseline gaps, but overlook that one of the fundamental reasons for building a baseline is to correct for natural geographical variations in isotope values that are reflected in every stage of the food-chain (Peterson and Fry Reference Peterson and Fry1987). In addition, very small quantities of marine resources in a diet dominated by terrestrial resources are difficult to discern using the traditional stable isotope bivariate plot (e.g. Bonsall et al. Reference Bonsall, Cook, Pickard, McSweeney and Bartosiewicz2009). These plots can give a broad indication of dietary habits by examining human isotope values in relation to a faunal baseline. However, relative contributions from different dietary sources cannot be calculated, and no meaningful statistical error can be placed upon dietary estimations. Linear interpolation, using δ13C measurements and theoretical 100% marine and terrestrial human diet δ13C end-members, has been utilized as a tool to calculate the abundance of marine protein in the diet (Arneborg et al. Reference Arneborg, Heinemeier, Lynnerup, Nielson, Rud and Sveinbjörnsdóttir1999; Cook et al. Reference Cook, Ascough, Bonsall, Hamilton, Russell, Sayle, Scott and Bownes2015). However, these end-points are commonly derived from populations that may not be relevant to the study and may not be representative of human diets in geographically diverse locations. To detect subtle variations in past diets using bulk bone collagen isotope analysis, we must use geographically relevant samples and interpret the data using models that provide more accurate dietary estimates.
This work used Food Reconstruction Using Isotopically Transferred Signals (FRUITS), a Bayesian mixing model developed by Fernandes et al. (Reference Fernandes, Millard, Brabec, Nadeau and Grootes2014) as a tool for reconstructing past human diets. The model works by comparing a mixed target to several isotopically unique sources and calculating the most probable relative contribution each source has made to form the target. The model can be can be used with or without added Bayesian priors. To produce accurate human dietary reconstructions using FRUITS, it is necessary to specify the dietary isotopic baseline values as “food values.” These are specified as the values of the food that was consumed, as opposed to the traditionally used faunal bone collagen values, because of the isotopic offset between flesh and bone (Peterson and Fry Reference Peterson and Fry1987). However, little consensus exists as to what the correct offsets are and whether they vary between species. The baseline values are specified because natural geological isotope values can vary, and these variations are reflected throughout the food chain from soil/ocean minerals to plants, to herbivores, to carnivores and omnivores. To obtain the correct baseline, it is important to measure the stable isotope values of fauna from the same context as the humans whose diet is being reconstructed. This gives the most accurate baseline values for FRUITS and, indeed, any other method of stable isotope dietary reconstruction.
Carding Mill Bay is a Neolithic shell midden on the west coast of Scotland (Figure 1). The midden contained a variety of faunal and some human remains within a matrix of marine shells dominated by limpets (Patella spp.). Radiocarbon dating places the midden in the period between 4000 and 3500 cal. BC (Connock et al. Reference Connock, Finlayson and Mills1991; Bronk Ramsey et al. Reference Bronk Ramsey, Pettitt, Hedges, Hodgins and Owen2000). The midden was excavated by Lorn Archaeological Society and finds analysis was carried out by Historic Environment Scotland. Finds included bones of birds, terrestrial mammals (wild herbivores and pig) and marine fish, together with a range of lithic and bone artifacts (Connock et al. Reference Connock, Finlayson and Mills1991). Disarticulated human remains were recovered from several contexts of the midden (IV, VII, X, XIV, XV, and XXIII) and from a cist burial in contexts II and III (Connock et al. Reference Connock, Finlayson and Mills1991). The site has been the subject of several later studies investigating the Scottish Neolithic because of the presence of both human and animal remains as well as “Obanian” artifacts, which are characteristic bevel ended antler or bone tools, often found in the absence of retouched stone tools (Schulting and Richards Reference Schulting and Richards2002; Bartosiewicz et al. Reference Bartosiewicz, Zapata and Bonsall2010).
The work we present here sought to better understand the dietary changes that occurred during the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in western Scotland, using δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S isotope measurements on bone collagen from human and animal remains from Carding Mill Bay. Given the sparse character of the faunal assemblage from this site, we tested the hypothesis that modern marine and terrestrial analogs could be used to supplement the ancient archaeological dietary baseline. To ensure the correct values were used in the FRUITS models, we used a local baseline, and measured species-specific Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen and Δ15Nmuscle protein-bone collagen offset values in three marine and four terrestrial species. These values were used to model the diet of four human individuals from the midden whose isotope measurements were previously interpreted to be indicative of a wholly terrestrial diet (Schulting and Richards Reference Schulting and Richards2002).
It is well known that the calibration of samples containing marine carbon must take account of the marine reservoir effect (MRE) and that ΔR values (representing the local offset from the global average surface water MRE at a point in time) in Scotland show spatial variability (Ascough et al. Reference Ascough, Cook, Dugmore, Barber, Higney and Scott2004; Cook et al. Reference Cook, Ascough, Bonsall, Hamilton, Russell, Sayle, Scott and Bownes2015). Given the uncertainty surrounding marine consumption in the early Scottish Neolithic, a further reason for estimating the marine contribution at Carding Mill Bay was to reassess published 14C dates at the site to take these MREs into account and report more accurate dates for the human samples. This necessitates a calculation of the Carding Mill Bay 14C reservoir offset value (ΔR) and the proportion of marine carbon contributing to the human bone collagen.
To place the site and the human remains in a more secure chronological context, two contexts were chosen for the determination of new ΔR values. The multiple paired marine-terrestrial sample approach was adopted (Ascough et al. 2009; Russell et al. 2015) together with χ2 testing (cf. Ward and Wilson 1978) to ensure that the groups of marine and terrestrial samples were internally, statistically indistinguishable. The two contexts chosen for analysis were XIV and XV. Carding Mill Bay has a range of quoted ΔR values (see Table 11), however, the values calculated by Reimer et al. (Reference Reimer, McCormac, Moore, McCormick and Murray2002) were based on single pairs of samples and since the terrestrial samples employed were charcoal, which can produce anomalously old ages because of the potential for an old wood effect, we made the decision not to use these. The value calculated by Ascough et al. (Reference Ascough, Cook, Dugmore, Barber, Higney and Scott2004) was identified as an outlier in the complete dataset: this may be because the 14C ages of terrestrial samples fell into two distinct groups and the correct offset was therefore difficult to determine. In light of this, improved values were sought using terrestrial herbivore bone collagen.
METHODS
Archaeological samples from the midden were provided by Glasgow Museums Research Centre and included 16 samples of at least three terrestrial species including red deer (Cervus elaphus), large mammals [cattle (Bos taurus), and/or red deer (Cervus elaphus)], and medium mammals [sheep (Ovis aries) and/or roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)], to form the isotope baseline for the terrestrial fauna from the site. Contexts with human remains were targeted—see Table 1. As there were no fish bones available to sample from Carding Mill Bay, the ancient marine fish baseline was derived from measurements of Viking Age/Medieval cod from Orkney and Caithness (Russell Reference Russell2011). Marine fish are highly mobile and this results in very little variation in isotope measurements of fish caught anywhere off the coast of Scotland (Barrett et al. Reference Barrett, Johnstone, Harland, Van Neer, Ervynck, Makowiecki, Heinrich, Hufthammer, Enghoff and Amundsen2008). Therefore, the fish from Orkney were deemed suitable analogs for fish caught at Oban. Modern terrestrial herbivore analogues came from organic farms in Perth and Dumfries (Table 2) Modern marine samples included three species of fish [cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) and pollock (Pollachius pollachius)] from the North Sea (Table 3) and four species of shellfish: cockles (Cerastoderma edule), limpets (Patella vulgata), mussels (Mytilus edulis), and winkles (Littorina littorea) from the Oban area (Table 4).
Modern bone samples were split into two fractions: an untreated fraction and a lipid extracted fraction. The lipid-extracted fraction was prepared as follows: each sample was crushed and solvent extracted in a sonic bath for 30 minutes using 2:1 DCM:MeOH (Dichloromethane:Methanol) followed by MeOH and finally with reverse osmosis water until traces of organic solvent were removed. Collagen was extracted from the lipid-free bone and the bone containing lipids. Ancient faunal bone samples were prepared using the standard SUERC bone collagen pretreatment method with ultrafiltration to remove degraded collagen and other contaminants (Dunbar et al. 2016). Shellfish flesh was Soxhlet extracted for 7 hr using 2:1 DCM:MeOH followed by 7 h using MeOH. The samples were then thoroughly soaked and washed several times with reverse osmosis water to remove residual organic solvent. Samples for stable isotope analysis were freeze-dried and measured using a Costech ECS 4010 elemental analyzer coupled via a Thermo Scientific Conflo IV to a Thermo Scientific Delta V Advantage continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer. For δ13C and δ15N measurements, approximately 600 μg of solid samples were measured alongside gelatine and tryptophan standards. For δ34S measurements, 10 mg of solid samples were measured alongside cysteine, sulphanilamide, and methionine standards.
For determination of the MRE, eight terrestrial herbivore bone collagen samples (four from each of the two contexts) were combusted in sealed quartz tubes and 3 mL samples of the CO2 were purified cryogenically, graphitized via zinc and iron reduction (Slota et al. 1987) and 14C dated by AMS measurement on the SUERC National Electrostatics Corporation 5MV tandem AMS instrument. For limpet shell samples (again four from each of the two contexts), surface contaminants were removed by first manually cleaning in water and then in a sonic bath within a beaker of water. They were then reacted with 1M HCl to remove the outer 20%. The shells were dried, ground, and 0.1 g subsamples placed in hydrolysis units, where a further 20% was removed using 1M HCl immediately before full hydrolysis of the remaining material. Finally, the shell was hydrolyzed, the CO2 extracted under vacuum and cryogenically purified. 3 mL subsamples of CO2 were graphitized via zinc and iron reduction before AMS measurement as described above.
Outliers in the age data were initially excluded using a χ2 test; an overall ΔR was then calculated using the multiple paired marine/terrestrial sample approach, whereby a ΔR value was calculated for all possible pairs and then a weighted mean paired offset was calculated for the context, with the variability expressed as the standard error for predicted values (Cook et al. Reference Cook, Ascough, Bonsall, Hamilton, Russell, Sayle, Scott and Bownes2015). The human dietary calculations and the new ΔR values were then to be used to recalibrate the existing 14C measurements of the human samples using OxCal 4.2, to assess whether any marine consumption detected would have a significant effect on the ages of the human bone collagen.
Published stable isotope values for four human individuals from Carding Mill Bay (Schulting and Richards Reference Schulting and Richards2002) were modeled in FRUITS along with the new baseline measurements to create dietary reconstructions. Food values for FRUITS models were calculated using species specific and local Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen and Δ15N muscle protein-bone collagen offsets. These offsets were derived by measuring the δ13C and δ15N values of paired flesh-bone collagen samples from representative modern marine and terrestrial species and calculating the difference between flesh and bone values. The mean values of these offsets were used to convert the faunal bone collagen baseline values to food values (see Tables 5 and 6).
RESULTS
Quality Assurance
Quality indicators were applied to the isotope measurements after pretreatment and after measurement to ensure that the data were reliable. For ancient bone collagen samples, collagen recovery must be greater than 1% of the total sample weight and the C/N atomic ratio value must be within the range 2.9–3.6 (DeNiro, Reference DeNiro1985). Three samples (GU18879, GU18880, and GU18881) were outside of the recommended atomic ratio range and were excluded from further discussion. Quality control indicators for sulphur isotope values for mammal bone collagen are C:S atomic ratio=600±300 and N:S atomic ratio=200±100, while for fish bone collagen they are C:S atomic ratio=175±50 and N:S atomic ratio=60±20 (Nehlich and Richards Reference Nehlich and Richards2009). Four samples (GU18879, GU18888, GU18890, GU18893) were outside of these and excluded from further consideration. There are currently no accepted quality indicators for modern flesh or bone collagen including lipid samples measured by CF-IRMS, however we can be confident that the samples were not degraded since they were stored at –20°C before pretreatment and they never came into contact with a burial environment.
Ancient Bone Collagen
Table 1 illustrates stable carbon, nitrogen and sulphur isotope measurements for herbivore bone collagen from Carding Mill Bay and marine fish from Robert’s Haven and Quoygrew. For herbivores, the mean isotope values were: δ13C=–22.8±0.43‰, δ15N=+3.1±0.47‰ and δ34S=+20.0±0.65‰. For marine fish, the values were: δ13C=–13.5±0.66‰, δ15N=+14.1±0.69‰ and δ34S=+16.5±0.44‰. The δ13C and δ15N results are typical of terrestrial herbivores that have been raised on unfertilized land (Bogaard et al. Reference Bogaard, Fraser, Heaton, Wallace, Vaiglova, Charles, Jones, Evershed, Styring and Andersen2013), and wild marine fish (Schoeninger and DeNiro Reference Schoeninger and Deniro1984). However, the sulphur isotope measurements made on the herbivores are indicative of a sea-spray effect, whereby marine sulphur is directly ingested by animals that graze near the sea (Wadleigh et al. Reference Wadleigh, Schwarcz and Kramer1994). For this reason, the sulphur isotope measurements were not used in the FRUITS models to reconstruct human paleodiet.
Modern Terrestrial Isotope Measurements
Table 2 illustrates average stable carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements for modern terrestrial herbivores that were candidates to supplement the faunal baseline at Carding Mill Bay. These values were used to produce geographically relevant food values for the FRUITS models. The mean isotope values for different tissue fractions were δ13C=–24.9±0.61‰ and δ15N=+5.2±1.74‰ for bone collagen, δ13C=–24.8±0.71‰ and δ15N=+5.2±1.79‰ for bone collagen including lipids, and δ13C=–26.8±0.71‰ and δ15N=+5.4±1.70‰ for muscle protein.
To account for the atmospheric Suess effect in modern organic samples, whereby organisms are depleted in 13C compared to ancient samples as a result of the release of carbon from fossil fuels in the last two centuries, carbon isotope data must be adjusted by +1.5‰ (Beavan Athfield et al. Reference Beavan Athfield, Green, Craig, McFadgen and Bickler2008). Comparing the adjusted modern bone collagen isotope measurements with the measurements from ancient animals at Carding Mill Bay demonstrated that modern and ancient populations are not isotopically comparable (see Figure 2). In addition, there is a large range in the stable nitrogen isotope values of modern herbivore bone collagen (1σ=1.70); this implies large physiological or dietary variations within the modern population that are not present in the ancient population. For this reason, the measurements of modern terrestrial bone collagen were excluded from the FRUITS models as they were deemed incomparable with ancient terrestrial fauna.
Modern Marine Isotope Measurements
Table 3 summarizes average stable carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur isotope measurements for modern marine fish species, which were candidates to supplement the marine faunal baseline. The mean isotope values for different tissue fractions were: δ13C=–15.2±0.77‰ and δ15N=+11.8±1.66‰ for bone collagen, δ13C=–16.1±1.41‰ and δ15N=+11.8±1.72‰ for bone collagen including lipids, and δ13C=–17.9±0.71‰ and δ15N=+12.1±1.82‰ for muscle protein.
In contrast to the terrestrial fauna, modern marine fish bone collagen appears to be a good analog for ancient marine bone collagen. Figure 3 shows carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements for modern and ancient cod bone collagen, and modern shellfish protein. The modern data has been corrected to account for the marine Suess effect. There is significant overlap in the isotope data of modern and archaeological cod bone collagen, indicating that chronologically distinct marine populations are isotopically comparable. Since modern and ancient cod bone collagen are comparable, we have made the assumption that modern shellfish flesh samples are also suitable analogs. Isotope data from these samples were used alongside the ancient measurements in FRUITS to build a representative marine dietary isotope baseline.
Isotopic Tissue Offsets
While modern terrestrial fauna proved to be unsuitable analogs for ancient samples for the reasons discussed above, stable isotope data from modern animals were useful when calculating tissue offsets that are necessary for modeling diet in FRUITS. Differences in δ13C between muscle tissue and bone collagen are related to physiological differences in the tissue structure: lipids are relatively depleted in 13C relative to bone collagen and flesh, and flesh is relatively depleted in 13C compared to bone collagen (Pinnegar and Polunin Reference Pinnegar and Polunin1999; Fernandes et al. Reference Fernandes, Grootes, Nadeau and Nehlich2015). These offset values may differ between species, so it is important to use appropriate offsets when reconstructing diet using FRUITS. Isotopic differences between muscle protein and bone collagen in both modern terrestrial samples (Table 2) and modern marine samples (Table 3) were therefore used to produce the Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen and Δ15Nmuscle protein-bone collagen values shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Human Dietary Reconstruction Using FRUITS
Tables 6, 8, and 9 summarize dietary and 14C data for four human bones (Table 7) recovered from different contexts of the Carding Mill Bay midden. The stable isotope data in Table 8 were used to model dietary intake using FRUITS. To establish whether there was a significant marine reservoir effect in the human bone collagen, the 14C ages given in Table 7 were recalibrated using the marine food source estimates generated by FRUITS and the new ΔR value that was obtained (see Tables 8–13).
* Consistent measurements were used to calculate values of ΔR. T-statistics shown are for consistent groups.
The modeling parameters considered when reconstructing diet at Carding Mill Bay for each of the human samples were as follows: the protein dietary intake was via the routed model, with carbon and nitrogen isotope values from four consumer bone collagen samples specified with an error of 0.5‰ to account for intra-individual variability, following (Fernandes et al. Reference Fernandes, Grootes, Nadeau and Nehlich2015). Tissue offsets applied to obtain the food values were as follows: terrestrial herbivore Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen=–1.9 and Δ15Nmuscle protein-bone collagen=+0.3, marine fish Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen=–2.7 and Δ15Nmuscle protein-bone collagen=+0.4. No tissue offsets were required for shellfish muscle protein values used. One dietary fraction (protein) from each of three food groups (terrestrial herbivores, marine fish, and marine shellfish) was then defined using the average stable isotope values and standard error of the mean of the modern faunal muscle protein: δ13Cherbivores=–24.7±0.1‰ and δ15Nherbivores=+3.4±0.1‰, δ13Cfish=–16.8±0.1‰ and δ15Nfish=+12.9±0.3‰, and δ13Cshellfish=–15.2±0.1‰ and δ15Nshellfish=+9.5±0.2‰. These values have been corrected to account for the marine Suess effect: modern marine carbon isotope data must be adjusted by 0.86‰ (Beavan Athfield et al. Reference Beavan Athfield, Green, Craig, McFadgen and Bickler2008). Chosen diet to collagen offsets were 1±1‰ for δ13C and 5.5±0.5‰ for δ15N. Table 12 and Figure 4 illustrate the results of dietary reconstruction using FRUITS.
Recalibrating Radiocarbon Dates at Carding Mill Bay
ΔR values were calculated for contexts XIV and XV at the site. For context XIV marine samples, one sample (GU39634) was excluded as an outlier and the remaining three samples passed the χ2 test. However, the terrestrial samples failed the χ2 test completely, with no two samples passing. On that basis, we determined that context XIV is mixed and unsuitable for deriving a ΔR value. For context XV, one marine and one terrestrial sample (GU39638 and GU39631, respectively) were removed and the remaining three samples in both groups passed the χ2 test. In this case, context XV was deemed suitable for ΔR calculation. The calculated value was –130±34 14C yr.
The 14C ages for the four humans at Carding Mill Bay were first calibrated using the terrestrial calibration curve within OxCal 4.2, to provide baseline 14C dates (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Bard, Bayliss, Beck, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Buck, Cheng, Edwards and Friedrich2013). The ages were then recalibrated using the mixed marine/terrestrial calibration curve within OxCal 4.2 (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, McCormac, Moore, McCormick and Murray2002), employing the marine dietary information for each individual obtained from FRUITS, together with the recalculated ΔR value. See Figure 5 for all 14C calibrations for this site.
DISCUSSION
There are three strands of the investigation that require discussion: the dietary habits and dates of the human remains at Carding Mill Bay, the subsistence strategies of the population, and the novel use of FRUITS to model Neolithic diet in western Scotland.
First, and most significantly, the results of the FRUITS reconstruction of all four humans reveal modest amounts (15±11 to 21±14%) of marine resources in the diet. This is significant, given that the site and the human samples are dated to the Neolithic, when exploitation of marine foods had supposedly been abandoned in favor of farming (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Schulting and Hedges2003). Our results are in contrast to previous interpretations of bulk bone isotope data that suggested a complete absence of marine resources in the Neolithic diet (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Schulting and Hedges2003; Richards and Schulting Reference Richards and Schulting2006; Cramp et al. Reference Cramp, Jones, Sheridan, Smyth, Whelton, Mulville, Sharples and Evershed2014), but are in agreement with the archaeological record for the site.
In all human samples analyzed, we see a diet dominated by terrestrial resources, but supplemented with marine fish and shellfish. The models suggest that shellfish were a more important resource at Carding Mill Bay than marine fish, and this is reflected in the archaeological record, with shellfish being far more abundant than fish remains (Connock et al. Reference Connock, Finlayson and Mills1991). It seems likely that the use of marine resources at this time would have been secondary to farm produce, either as a supplement to the diet or as a famine food in times of crop/livestock failure. The employment of shellfish gathering being prioritized over fishing is sensible: shellfish were easy to source with very little skill, and required no tools more complicated than a rock to dislodge them. Fishing, on the other hand, required specialist skill and equipment, took more time, and quite probably yielded fewer rewards. If Early Neolithic communities exploited wild marine resources, it is sensible that they would choose the simpler and more rewarding over the difficult and time consuming.
The findings at Carding Mill Bay have parallels with results derived from high-resolution measurements of stable isotopes in tooth dentine from Neolithic individuals in Shetland (Montgomery et al. Reference Montgomery, Beaumont, Jay, Keefe, Gledhill, Cook, Dockrill and Melton2013). These showed that at least during their childhood years they periodically and temporarily returned to eating marine resources before reverting back to a more terrestrial-based diet. The authors hypothesized that this was in response to difficulties encountered while attempting to maintain a sedentary farming culture in a marginal environment (Montgomery et al. Reference Montgomery, Beaumont, Jay, Keefe, Gledhill, Cook, Dockrill and Melton2013). While our bulk bone collagen isotope values cannot reveal periodic returns to marine resources at different stages in life, they do show small inputs of marine resources to the diet, which is also evident in the results from Shetland.
Following our recalibration of the four 14C ages derived from human bone collagen, to take into account the improved ΔR value for the site and the potential marine reservoir effect caused by the consumption of shellfish and fish, we find very little shift in the ages. While Figure 5 and Table 13 show that the recalibrated ages are less precise, our assertion is that they are more accurate. This is noteworthy, since, even after correction of the ages, these individuals date to the first half of the Scottish Neolithic; not only do we demonstrate that the chronology of the site is reliable and secure, but we show that fish and shellfish in the diet can be firmly associated with the Neolithic.
Further information about subsistence practices at Carding Mill Bay can be derived from the stable isotope data of the Neolithic terrestrial herbivores. The sulphur isotope measurements of all herbivores at the site indicate a marine signal, demonstrating the ingestion of sulphur indirectly from seawater, most commonly described as the “sea-spray effect” (Wadleigh et al. Reference Wadleigh, Schwarcz and Kramer1994). This effect, caused by animals grazing close to a coastline, as observed here, suggests that the animals were probably raised locally and not moved from inland sites to the Oban area. The low δ15N values for the herbivore bone collagen also suggest that the land on which these animals grazed was not fertilized with manure, and the low δ13C values indicate they were not foddered with seaweed (Bogaard et al. Reference Bogaard, Fraser, Heaton, Wallace, Vaiglova, Charles, Jones, Evershed, Styring and Andersen2013). While we can be confident of the latter point because significant foddering would result in a slight “marine signature” to the δ13C values, we cannot say the same of the former since comparison of nitrogen isotope values from pre-Neolithic herbivores would be required to be sure that the low values are not simply as a result of a natural geographical variation in isotopes.
We can also make some observations about FRUITS as a dietary reconstruction model. The accuracy and reliability of FRUITS has been demonstrated in several past studies (Fernandes et al. Reference Fernandes, Millard, Brabec, Nadeau and Grootes2014, Reference Fernandes, Grootes, Nadeau and Nehlich2015; Sayle et al. Reference Sayle, Hamilton, Gestsdóttir and Cook2016), however, the application of modeling parameters has always been at the user’s discretion. Δ13Cmuscle protein-bone collagen and Δ15Nmuscle protein-bone collagen offset values used here have been specifically calculated from tissue fractions of animals of the same species as those analyzed in the isotope faunal baseline. Offsets are reasonably comparable across species from the same environment and the error associated with each value indicates that they are relatively accurate representations of tissue offsets (see Tables 4 and 5). The use of empirically derived offsets in FRUITS removes any uncertainty associated with values calculated from unrepresentative species and geographically incomparable sites, thus strengthening the reliability of the models in this study.
Finally, we have demonstrated the ability of FRUITS to distinguish between the consumption of different food groups from the same environment. Traditional interpretations of stable carbon and nitrogen isotope plots are unable to identify the consumption of shellfish separately from the consumption of fish. Indeed, dietary interpretations based on a standard linear mixing model never even consider shellfish as a potential food source since they cannot be included in a bone collagen faunal baseline. The abundance of shellfish remains in coastal middens in Scotland necessitates their consideration as a part of the Neolithic diet. The fact that the isotopic food value of shellfish differs in δ15N enrichment from fish suggests they should be treated as a distinct food source in future dietary studies.
CONCLUSIONS
At Carding Mill Bay, we demonstrate how the use of stable isotope measurements from human and animal bone collagen, realistic collagen/muscle isotope offsets, and the Bayesian mixing model (FRUITS) for determining paleodiet reveals the presence of small amounts of marine resources in the diet of Early Neolithic humans recovered from this site. Our consideration of archaeological and stable isotope evidence from Neolithic western Scotland suggests that the dietary shifts from marine to terrestrial resources were not as rapid or absolute as has been suggested. Finally, we can make certain suggestions about farming practices at this coastal site, with evidence showing that animals at Carding Mill Bay may have been of local origin and that foddering and fertilization practices, observed in later Neolithic sites, were not present.
Our results have implications both for dietary research using stable isotopes and for archaeological investigations of shell middens. When building a picture of ancient diet using stable isotopes, it is important to consider all available dietary evidence from the site and include this in a dietary baseline. The importance of using dietary baselines is well established, but we must ensure that they are also representative of the diet consumed by the human individuals analyzed. Where there is evidence of dietary habits, but a lack of samples suitable for stable isotope analysis, appropriate modern analogs should be used to increase sample size. We must also consider the appropriate model to use when estimating ancient diets. In sites like Carding Mill Bay, with evidence of varying subsistence practices, it is essential to use a Bayesian mixing model such as FRUITS, which is capable of discerning small contributions of different food groups.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff of the SUERC radiocarbon and AMS laboratories for assistance with sample pretreatment, stable isotope, and 14C measurements. We also thank Ricardo Fernandes for the time spent providing training and advising on the appropriate use of FRUITS. The assistance of Sheena Fraser with archaeozoological analysis of faunal samples is gratefully acknowledged. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on this paper. Samples for analysis were obtained in collaboration with staff of the Glasgow Museums Research Centre and Historic Environment Scotland. Funding for this research was provided by the AHRC (Grant no. AH/L008521/1).