Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:59:21.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of concentration and model validation

Key issues for the consequence analysis of radioactive waste repositories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

S. Xu
Affiliation:
Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI)
B. Dverstorp
Affiliation:
Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI)
A. Wörman
Affiliation:
The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we examine some critical aspects concerning the justification of simplified radioecological models used in safety assessments for geological repositories. We propose a modelling approach for regulatory review of dose and risk calculations for a nuclear waste repository. The SSI modelling tools are applied to explore uncertainties in the size of the contaminant area due to leakage of radionuclides from a damaged nuclear waste canister. We demonstrate that an improved representation of geosphere transport processes will also enhance our understanding of radionuclide migration in the biosphere and provide a better basis for evaluating radiological consequences in the safety assessment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fischer, H.B., List, E.J., Koh, R.C.Y., Imberger, J. and Brooks, N.H. (1979). Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic Press INC. London.
Marklund, L., Wörman, A., SimiÉć, E., Geier, J. and Dverstorp, B. (2007). The impact of different geological parameters on transport of radionuclides. (in press): Nuclear Technology.
Ashworth, D.J. and Shaw, G. (2005). Effects of moisture content and redox potential on in situ Kd values for radioiodine in soil. Science of the Total Environment. Doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.018.
Van Genuchten, M. Th. and Cleary, R.W. (1979). Movement of solutes in soil: computer-simulated and laboratory results. In: G.H. Bolt (Ed), Soil Chemistry, Part B. Physicochemical Models. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 349–386.
Wörman, A., Packman, A.I., Johansson, H. and Jonsson, K. (2002). Effect of flow-induced exchange in hyporheic zones on longitudinal transport of solutes in streams and rivers. Water Resources Research. Vol. 38, No. 1, 10.1029/2001WR000769.
Karlsson, S., Bergström, U. and Meili, M. (2001). Models for dose assessments Models adapted to SFR-area, Sweden. SKB TR-01-04. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB.
Xu, S., Wörman, A. and Dverstorp, B. (2007). Criteria for resolution-scales and parameterisation of compartmental models of hydrological and ecological mass flow in watersheds. Journal of Hydrology. 335, 364–373.
Broed, R. and Xu, S. (2008). Ecolego Toolbox version 1.0 user's manual. SSI report 2008:10. Statens strålskyddsinstitut, Sweden.
Marsily, G. (1986). Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers. Academic Press, Inc.
Xu, S., Wörman, A., Dverstorp, B., Kłos, R., Shaw, G. and Marklund, L. (2008). SSI's independent~consequence calculations~in support of the regulatory review of the SR-Can safety assessment. SSI report 2008:08. Statens strålskyddsinstitut, Sweden.
Avila, R. (2006). The ecosystem models used for dose assessment in SR-Can, SKB R-06-81, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB.
Wörman, A., Dverstorp, B.A., Kłos, R.A. and Xu, S. (2004). Role of the bio- and geosphere interface on migration pathways for 135Cs and ecological effects. Nuclear Technology. 148, 194–204.