Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:55:48.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The realistic dose concept applied to radiological assessments in NORM industries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

J. Barescut ,
B. Robles ,
J. C. Mora ,
C. Trueba  and
D. Cancio
B. Robles
Affiliation:
Radiological Protection for the Public and Environment Unit, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. C. Mora
Affiliation:
Radiological Protection for the Public and Environment Unit, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
C. Trueba
Affiliation:
Radiological Protection for the Public and Environment Unit, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
D. Cancio
Affiliation:
Radiological Protection for the Public and Environment Unit, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The Spanish law that transposes the European Directive 29/96 is based on the recommendations established by ICRP in 1991. This law requires that estimations of the doses due to radioactive emissions, from practices or installations in which ionising radiation sources are used, must be performed in a regular base and in the more realistic possible way. More recently, the ICRP, as well as the European Union, recommended that, in order to reach a realistic estimation, a gradual approach made by consecutive iterations should be made. However, in spite of the huge amount of documentation, realistic dose assessments are usually treated just for artificial radionuclides, being Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) industries only considered by regulation, regarding to the necessity of performing studies to determine if there is or is not a significant increase in the exposition to the workers or to the public. In this paper an adaptation of the general criteria used to carry on realistic dose assessments for the particular case of NORM is presented. Also the difficulties and implications, that applying such criteria involve, are analysed. In addition the main parameters, which could influence the uncertainty of the assessment, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 44 , Issue 5: ECORAD 2008 - Radioecology and Environmental Radioactivity , 2009 , pp. 581 - 584
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Real Decreto 738/2001 de 26 de Julio de 2001. “Reglamento para la protección sanitaria contra radiaciones ionizantes”. BOE 178, 2001.
CEC. “Council Directive 96/29/EURATOM: laying down basic standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation”. Official Journal of the European Communities L159, 1996.
ICRP 1991 “1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection”. Volume 21, 1–3, 1991.
ICRP 101. “Assessing Dose of the Representative Person for the Purpose of Radiation Protection of the Public and The Optimisation of Radiological Protection: Broadening the Process”. Volume 36, 3, 2006.
ICRP 103. “Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection”. Volume 37, 2–4, 2008.
Radiation Protection 129. “Guidance on the realistic assessment of radiation doses to members of the public due to the operation of nuclear installation under normal conditions”. European Communities, 2002.
Baeza A., Calcio D., Corbacho J.A., Guillén J., Miralles Y., Mora J.C., Robles B., Suáñez A.Y. and Vasco J. “Estudio del impacto radiológico de las centrales térmicas de carbón sobre sus entornos”. Unidad de producción térmica de Teruel. Colección documentos Ciemat. 2007.
Huijbregts W.M.M., de Jong M.P. and Timmermans C.W.M. “Hazardous accumulation of radioactive lead on the water wall tubes in coal-fired boilers”. Anti Corrosion Methods and Materials. 47–5: 274–279, 2000.