Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:21:03.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A mathematical model for an optimal appointed delivery date on a home delivery market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2005

Hidefumi Kawakatsu
Affiliation:
Department of Information & Economics, University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences, Nishi, Kobe 651-2188 Japan; Hidefumi_Kawakatsu@red.umds.ac.jp
Hiroaki Sandoh
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Kobe Gakuin University, Nishi, Kobe 651-2188 Japan; sandoh@ba.kobegakuin.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

In recent years, the home delivery market has rapidly been growing since customers can purchase a variety of products very easily via Internet. At the same time, however, customers tend to switch from a supplier to another seeking for better service for them. For this reason, it is necessary for suppliers to enclose their customers by means of various kinds of service and strategy. An appointed delivery date of a product ordered by a customer is one of important factors of supplier's services. From the suppliers' point of view, they hope to make the period from the order date to the delivery date as short as possible to increase their customers, but at the same time they prefer to make this period as long as possible since the risk becomes higher that they cannot deliver products to their consumer by the appointed date under the short period appointed date. This study proposes a stochastic model to determine an optimal appointed delivery date for a supplier. For small values of an appointed delivery date L, the probability that a customer purchases the product becomes larger, but the probability of tardiness increases. In contrast, the purchase probability as well as the penalty of tardiness decreases with L. From this point of view, this study formulates the expected profit for a supplier, which is to be maximized as an objective function. Clarified are the conditions under which an optimal appointed delivery date exists for the case where the purchase probability is expressed by a multinomial logit model. Numerical examples are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

J. Gattorna, Strategic supply chain alignment: best practice in supply chain management. Gower Publishing Limited, Hampshire England (1998).
Çetinkaya, S. and Lee, C., Stock replenishment and shipment scheduling for vendor-managed inventory systems. Manage. Sci. 46 (2000) 217232. CrossRef
Chen, F. and Samroengraja, R., A staggered ordering policy for one-warehouse, multiretailer systems. Oper. Res. 48 (2000) 281293. CrossRef
Li, C. and Cheng, T.C.E., due-date determination with resequencing. IIE Transactions 31 (1999) 183188.
Dewan, S. and Mendelson, H., User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Manage. Sci. 36 (1990) 15021517. CrossRef
Stidham, S., Pricing, JR. and capacity decisions for a service facility: Stability and multiple local optima. Manage. Sci. 38 (1992) 11211139. CrossRef
Palaka, K., Erlebacher, S. and Kropp, D.H., Lead-time setting, capacity utilization, and pricing decisions under lead-time dependent demand. IIE Transactions 30 (1998) 151163.
So, K.C. and Song, J., Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111 (1998) 2849. CrossRef
Boyaci, T. and Product di, S. Rayfferentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manufact. Service Oper. Manage. 5 (2003) 1336.
Kalai, E., Kamien, M.I. and Rubinovitch, M., Optimal service speeds in a competitive environment. Manage. Sci. 38 (1992) 11541163. CrossRef
The, L. Li role of inventory in delivery-time competition. Manage. Sci. 38 (1992) 182-197.
Li, L. and Lee, Y.S., Pricing and delivery-time performance in a competitive environment. Manage. Sci. 40 (1994) 633646. CrossRef
Lederer, P.J. and Pricing, L. Li, production, scheduling, and delivery-time competition. Oper. Res. 45 (1997) 407420. CrossRef
Prince, K.C. So and time competition for service delivery. Manufact. Service Oper. Manage. 2 (2000) 392409.
S.P. Anderson, Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992).
Basuroy, S. and Nguyen, D., Multinomial logit market share models: equilibrium characteristics and strategic implications. Manage. Sci. 44 (1998) 13961408. CrossRef
Chintagunta, P.K., Measuring the effects of new brand introduction on inter-brand strategic interaction. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 118 (1999) 315331. CrossRef
Hanson, W. and Martin, K., Optimizing multinomial logit profit functions. Manage. Sci. 42 (1996) 9921003. CrossRef
J.J. Louviere, D.A. Hensher and J.D. Swait, Stated choice methods. Cambridge University Press (2000).