Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:11:25.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CALL, the foreign-language undergraduate and the teaching of grammar: a linguistic and political battlefield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2011

Peter Metcalfe
Peter Metcalfe
Affiliation:
Open University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent history of the teaching of grammar, both for first- and second-language learning, has produced highly polarised and acrimonious debate. The repercussions have extended beyond the boundaries of linguistics into the social and political domain. The present generation of foreign-language undergraduates has been profoundly (if unknowingly) affected by this debate, as reflected in their approach to the learning of grammar, and any consideration of the methodology of language teaching, including that of CALL, must take account of it.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 4 , Issue 7 , November 1992 , pp. 3 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barchan, J, New Approaches to Computer Aided Language Learning, Chapter 11 in Cameron, K C, Dodd, W S and Rahtz, S P Q, Computers and Modern Language Studies, Ellis Harwood, Chichester, 1986.Google Scholar
Benwell, G A, Integrating the Computer into a Language Course, Chapter 1 in Cameron, K C, Dodd, W S and Rahtz, S P Q, Computers and Modern Language Studies, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1986.Google Scholar
Brierley, W and Kemble, I, Computing in the Humanities: Translation and the Computer, The CTISS File, Vol 7, 1988, pp 85–90.Google Scholar
Butt, J, A Year's Full-time Use of a CALL System, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol 1, 1990, pp 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R, The New Grammar Teaching, Chapter 5 in Carter, R (ed), Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1990.Google Scholar
DES, English from 5 to 16 (2nd ed.), HMSO, London, 1986.Google Scholar
DES, Modern Foreign Languages to 16, HMSO, London, 1987.Google Scholar
DES, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English (The Kingman Report), HMSO, London, 1988Google Scholar
DES, Modern Foreign Languages for ages 11 to 16 (The Harris Report), HMSO, London, 1990.Google Scholar
Fox, J, Matthews, A, Matthews, C and Rope, A, Educational Technology in Modern Language Learning, Training Agency, Sheffield, 1990.Google Scholar
Higgins, J, The Computer and Grammar Teaching, Chapter 3 in Leech, G and Candlin C, N (eds), Computers in English Language Teaching and Research, Longman, Harlow, 1986.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G, Multiple-Choice Questions in Computer-Assisted Language Learning, Chapter 1 in Chesters, G and Gardner, N (eds), Use of Computers in the Teaching of Language and Languages: Proceedings of a Conference organised by the School of Modern Languages and Cultures, Hull University, CTISS, Bath University, 1987.Google Scholar
McKee, J, Wilson, R N, Henderick, P J, Gillespie, J G and McGrath, J G, TAP: A New Tool for Language Acquisition, The CTISS File, Vol 10, 1990, pp 45–49.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, P A, CALL and Grammar in Higher Education, Unpublished MSc thesis, Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, 1991.Google Scholar