Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:12:54.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing oral communication in Spanish lower-level courses: The case of voice recording and videoconferencing activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2018

Marta Tecedor Open the ORCID record for Marta Tecedor [Opens in a new window]  and
Gonzalo Campos-Dintrans Open the ORCID record for Gonzalo Campos-Dintrans [Opens in a new window]
Marta Tecedor
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, USA (marta.tecedor@asu.edu)
Gonzalo Campos-Dintrans
Affiliation:
University of Mary Washington, USA (gcamposd@umw.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study adds to the literature on computer-mediated communication (CMC) by examining the impact of online voice recording (VR) activities and peer-to-peer videoconferencing (VC) conversations on the development of beginning Spanish learners’ speaking performance. Specifically, this paper explores (1) whether VR and VC activities promote oral proficiency, and if so, whether those gains can be seen both in presentational and interpersonal modes of communication; and (2) whether VR and VC activities foster oral proficiency in similar ways to face-to-face (F2F) communication. A quasi-experimental, pre-/post-test design was used in the study. Three sections of a first semester Spanish course were assigned to one of the following conditions: F2F, VR, and VC. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency measures were used to analyze learners’ speaking performance in the two tasks. A mixed effects model analysis was used to investigate differences across time as well as among groups. Results show that both F2F communication and VR activities promote complexity and fluency in presentational tasks and fluency in interpersonal tasks, although F2F produces superior results regarding complexity in presentational tasks. VC activities promote complexity and fluency in presentational tasks and complexity, accuracy, and fluency in interpersonal tasks. Overall, this study shows that medium is not merely a delivery device but has important implications for learning outcomes. In this sense, these findings contribute to answering the wider question of how the use of technology in second language instruction plays a decisive role in current teaching practices.

Keywords

CMC toolsvoice recordingvideoconferencingCAFbeginning learners
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 116 - 134
Copyright
© European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Z. I. (2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal 87(2): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184 Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J. Tavakoli, M. (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research 15(1): 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 Google Scholar
Beauvois, M. H. (1998) Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review 54(2): 198–217. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.2.198 Google Scholar
Bueno Alastuey, M. C. (2011) Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(5): 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.574639 Google Scholar
Cho, S. P. Carey, S. (2001) Increasing Korean oral fluency using an electronic bulletin board and Wimba-based voiced chat. The Korean Language in America 6, 115–128.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2006) CALL technologies for L2 reading. In Ducate L & Arnold N (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 69–98. https://calico.org/product/calling-on-call/ Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2011) CALL technologies for L2 reading post Web 2.0. In Arnold N & Ducate L (eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (2nd ed.). San Marcos: CALICO, 131–170. https://calico.org/publications/book-series/present-and-future-promises-of-call/ Google Scholar
Elola, I. Oskoz, A. (2011) Writing between the lines: Acquiring the presentational mode through social tools. In Arnold N & Ducate L (eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 171–210. https://calico.org/publications/book-series/present-and-future-promises-of-call/ Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. Mackey, A. (2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review 19(1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gas Google Scholar
Gleason, J. Suvorov, R. (2012) Learner perceptions of asynchronous oral computer-mediated communication: Proficiency and second language selves. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(1): 100–121.Google Scholar
Goddard, J. (1995) Perspectives on videoconferencing. ASCILITE‘95 − Learning with Technology. Twelfth Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. University of Melbourne, 3–7 December.Google Scholar
Guillén, G. A. Blake, R. J. (2017) Can you repeat, please? L2 complexity, awareness, and fluency development in the hybrid “classroom. In Sanz-Sánchez I, Rivera-Μills SV & Morin R (eds.), Online language teaching research: Pedagogical, academic and institutional issues. Corvallis: Trysting Tree Books, 55–78.Google Scholar
Iwashita, N. (1999) Tasks and learners’ output in nonnative-nonnative interaction. In Kanno K (ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.20.06iwa Google Scholar
Izumi, S. (2003) Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics 24(2): 168–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.168 Google Scholar
Jones, L. C. (2006) Listening comprehension in multimedia environments. In Ducate L & Arnold N (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 99–126. https://calico.org/product/calling-on-call/ Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2014) Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the Internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal 98(1): 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie WC & Bhatia TK (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 413–469. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/76945 Google Scholar
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F. Vedder, I. (2007) The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(3): 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.011 Google Scholar
Murray, L. Hourigan, T. (2006) Using micropublishing to facilitate writing in the foreign language. In Ducate L & Arnold N (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 149–179. https://calico.org/product/calling-on-call/ Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. G. (2006) Teaching pronunciation and intonation with computer technology. In Ducate L & Arnold N (eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 127–148. https://calico.org/product/calling-on-call/ Google Scholar
Poza, M. I. C. (2005) The effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on learners’ anxiety when speaking a foreign language. West Virginia University, unpublished PhD.Google Scholar
Robin, R. (2011) Listening comprehension in the age of Web 2.0. In Arnold N & Ducate L (eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching. San Marcos: CALICO, 93–130. https://calico.org/publications/book-series/present-and-future-promises-of-call/ Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning 45(1): 99–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00964.x Google Scholar
Sadoux, M. (2013) Here, there, and everywhere? The higher education academy. http://www.hear.ac.uk/assets/documents/disciplines/Languages/Hear_there_and_everywhere.pdf.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (1999) Non-native speakers’ production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning 49(4): 627–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00104 Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. Foster, P. (1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49(1): 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass SM & Madden CG (eds.), Input in second language acquisition. New York: Newbury House, pp. 235–256.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook G & Seidelhofer B (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–144.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1997) Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses. 34: 115–132.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. M. (2005) Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal 22(3): 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i3.399-431 Google Scholar
Vercellotti, M. L. (2017) The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics 38(1): 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002 Google Scholar
Wang, T. (2006) The effects of Wimba on learning: A students and faculty perspective. The University of British Columbia, unpublished master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2004) Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology 8(3): 90–121.Google Scholar
Xiao, M. (2007) An empirical study of using Internet-based desktop videoconferencing in an EFL setting. Ohio University, unpublished PhD.Google Scholar
Yanguas, Í. (2010) Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time!. Language Learning & Technology 14(3): 72–93.Google Scholar
Yuan, F. Ellis, R. (2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1 Google Scholar