Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:05:36.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The multiple roles of the task design mediator in telecollaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Carolin Fuchs ,
Bill Snyder ,
Bruce Tung  and
Yu Jung Han
Carolin Fuchs
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (email: cfuchs@cityu.edu.hk)
Bill Snyder
Affiliation:
Kanda University of International Studies, Japan (email: snyder-w@kanda.kuis.ac.jp)
Bruce Tung
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, USA (email: btung@sas.upenn.edu)
Yu Jung Han
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, USA (email: yhan18@u.rochester.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This case study explores how a Chinese-American novice teacher acted as mediator in a telecollaboration with student teacher (ST) peers in the USA who designed tasks for his English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in China. The novice teacher was instrumental in mediating the student teachers’ task design process by providing feedback regarding technological and institutional constraints, and the nuances of his target student population. He appropriated and adapted the tasks to make them relevant for his EFL learners. Against the backdrop of the three dimensions of professional capital – human, social, and decisional – the research questions explored how the novice teacher used the different types of knowledge of context (pedagogical, institutional, technical) in relation to task design, and his perception of his role as mediator. Within a sociocultural framework for telecollaboration studies, this exploratory case study shares characteristics of ethnography, action research, and narrative inquiry. Data triangulation included text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC) data (Google Groups, emails), a narrative written by the novice teacher, and a semi-structured, reflective Skype interview with him. The findings indicate that he demonstrated high commitment, thorough preparation, continuous reflection, and development while navigating between his different roles of mediator, assessor, implementer, and field observer.

Keywords

telecollaborationteacher educationprofessional capitalmediationtask designcomputer-mediated communication
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 239 - 256
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L. and Lord, G. (2005) Using computer-mediated communication to establish social and supportive environments in teacher education. CALICO Journal, 22(3): 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A. (2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2): 68–117.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3: 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M. P. (1987) Learner contributions to task design. In: Candlin, C. N. and Murphy, D. (eds.), Language learning tasks. Lancaster practical papers in English language education, 7. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.18lea Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. (2006) Collegial development in ELT: The interface between global processes and local understanding. In: Gieve, S. and Miller, I. K. (eds.), Understanding the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523166_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M. and Candlin, C. N. (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(1): 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.2.89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, F. M. and Clandinin, D. J. (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5): 2–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, C. and Gu, Q. (2010) The new lives of teachers. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1989) The research act, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dooly, M. (2011) Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Tasks-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2): 69–91.Google Scholar
Dooly, M. and O’Dowd, R. (2012) Introduction to M. Dooly and R. O’Dowd (eds.), Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange. Bern: Peter Lang, 11–41. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0414-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooly, M. and Sadler, R. (2013) Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25(1): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344012000237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. and Hanson-Smith, E. (eds.) (2007) CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (2nd edn.). Alexandria: TESOL.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R. and Feuerstein, S. (1999) Mediated learning experience: A theoretical review. In: Feuerstein, R., Klein, P. and Tannenbaum, A. (eds.), Mediated learning experience: Theoretical, psychosocial, and learning implications. Tel Aviv: Freund Publishing House. 3–52.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Hauck, M. and Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012) Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 82–102.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Snyder, B., Bishop, S. and Charalambous, P. (2012) Cross-cultural mediators in international online collaborations: Curricular implications. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics 2012 Conference, Boston, MA, March 24–27.Google Scholar
Guth, S. and Helm, F. (eds.) (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0 for language and intercultural learning. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2010) Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In: Thomas, M. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. London: Continuum, 131–153. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212366.ch-007 Google Scholar
Hampel, R. and Hauck, M. (2006) Computer-mediated language learning: Making meaning in multimodal virtual learning spaces. JALT CALL Journal, 2(2): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (2012) Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Harry, B., Sturges, K. and Klingner, J. (2005) Qualitative data analysis: Mapping the process. Educational Researcher, 34(2): 3–13.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. (2010) The enactment of task design in telecollaboration 2.0. In: Thomas, M. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. London: Continuum, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212366.ch-010 Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2004) Learner training for effective use of CALL. In: Fotos, S. and Browne, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 45–67.Google Scholar
Lett, J. (1987) The human enterprise: A critical introduction to anthropological theory. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lewins, A. and Silver, C. (2007) Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2005) Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration: A model for language teacher education. In: Belz, J. A. and Thorne, S. L. (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 63–84.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012) The classroom-based action research paradigm in telecollaboration. In: Dooly, M. and O’Dowd, R. (eds.), Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange. Bern: Peter Lang, 163–194.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. and Bailey, K. M. (2009) Exploring second language classroom research. A comprehensive guide. Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2013) The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.853374 Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. and Ware, P. D. (2009) Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2005) Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3): 233–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raith, T. and Hegelheimer, V. (2010) Teacher development, TBLT, and technology. In: Thomas, M. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. London: Continuum, 154–175. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474212366.ch-008 Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. (2012) Accommodating different frameworks in analysis of technology-mediated L2 interaction. In: Dooly, M. and O’Dowd, R. (eds.), Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange. Bern: Peter Lang, 45–77.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2009) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research (2nd edn.). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (1988) The classroom and the language learner. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (1998) Using L1 to master L2: A response to Antón and DiCamilla’s “sociocognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom.” Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3): 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar