Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:15:59.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Online reading strategies at work: What teachers think and what students do

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

Hsin-Chou Huang
Hsin-Chou Huang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied English, National Taiwan Ocean University, 2 Pei-Ning Road, Keelung 202, Taiwan (email: joehuang@ntou.edu.tw)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study designed and developed a web-based reading strategy training program and investigated students’ use of its features and EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the program. The recent proliferation of online reading materials has made information easily available to L2 readers; however, L2 readers’ ability to deal with them requires the development of specific reading strategies. The researcher therefore constructed a web-based strategy training program on the basis of L2 reading strategy research and pedagogy. The program offers four types of reading strategy functions (Global, Problem-solving, Support, and Socio-affective) through 15 strategy buttons: Keyword, Preview, Prediction, Outline, Summary, Semantic Mapping, Pronunciation, Speed Reading, Dictionary, Translation, Grammar, Highlight, Notebook, Music Box, and My Questions. Forty college teachers and thirty-two EFL students in Taiwan were invited to use and evaluate this program. The researcher tracked students’ use of the functions, and teachers and students completed a survey and written reflections that documented their perceptions of the program. Both groups gave positive feedback on the program's user-friendly interface design and the effectiveness of its strategy function keys for enhancing reading comprehension and motivating learning. They also thought highly of the site's extensive offerings of reading opportunities supported by effective reading aids and a computerized classroom management system, features not available in large traditional classes. There was, however, a gap between what teachers thought and what students did. The teachers thought highly of Global strategies, whereas students regarded Support strategies as more useful. The low-proficiency group's heavy use of Support strategies explained this gap. The high-proficiency group's more frequent use of Global strategies echoed teachers’ preference for teaching Global strategies. This connection suggests that teachers should provide more explicit training to encourage all students to use Global strategies for overall textual understanding.

Keywords

online readingreading strategyEFLweb-basedsecond language readingcomputer-assisted language learning
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 340 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickel, B.Truscello, D. (1996) New opportunities for learning: Styles and strategies for computers. TESOL Journal, 6(1): 20–24.Google Scholar
Block, E. (1992) See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2): 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler-Pascoe, M. E.Wiburg, K. M. (2003) Technology and teaching English language learners. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Carrell, P., Pharis, B.Liberto, J. (1989) Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4): 647–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. M. (2005) Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction—An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3): 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. H.-J. (2004) Developing a web-based reading center for language teachers and learners. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the R.O.C. Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan: Crane Publishing Company, 415–427.Google Scholar
Chen, H. H.-J. (2011) Developing and evaluating an oral skills training website. ReCALL, 23(1): 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. (2001) L2 reading on the Web: Strategies for accessing information in hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(5): 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D.Plass, J. (1996) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2): 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (2006) Internet and literacy in the developing world: Delivering the teacher with the text. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(6): 627–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coiro, J.Dobler, E. (2007) Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2): 214–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A. (2011) Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3): 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R.Bamford, J. (1998) Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2012) Digital video revisited: Storytelling, conferencing, remixing. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (1991) Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25: 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W.Stoller, F. (2002) Teaching and researching reading. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huang, H.-c. (2006) EFL learners’ online reading strategy use and text comprehension: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University: Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Huang, H.-c. (2008 a) Teachers’ perceptions of the web-based reading strategy training program. Paper presented at The 2008 Asia TEFL International Conference, Sanur Paradise Plaza Hotel, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Huang, H.-c. (2008 b) Designing computer-assisted reading programs: Exploring EFL learners' online reading strategies. Paper presented at The 15th World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA 2008), CCE Congress Centre (CCE West), Essen, Germany.Google Scholar
Huang, H.-c, Chern, C. L.Lin, C. C. (2009) EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (1989) Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal, 73: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (2005) Insights into second language reading: A cross linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, L. C. (2009) E-reading and e-responding: New tools for the next generation of readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(3): 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leu, D. J. Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J.Cammack, D. (2004) Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In: Ruddell, R. and Unrau, N. (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. International Reading Association: Newark, 1570–1613.Google Scholar
Liaw, M. (2006) E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3): 49–64.Google Scholar
Lin, H.Chen, T. (2007) Reading authentic EFL Text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3): 83–106.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J.Chang, Y. J. (2010) Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54: 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C.Sadykova, G. (2011) Introducing EFL faculty to online instructional conversations. ReCALL, 23(3): 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohsen, M. A.Balakumar, M. (2011) A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. ReCALL, 23(2): 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtari, K.Reichard, C. (2002) Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2): 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C.Sheorey, R. (2008) Metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies among adolescent readers. In: Mokhtari, K. and Sheorey, R. (eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners: See how they read. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, 99–112.Google Scholar
Mokhtari, K.Sheorey, R. (2002) Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3): 2–10.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (1997) How users read on the web. http://www.usit.com/alertbox/9710a.htmlGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M.Chamot, A. U. (1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.Kim, D. (2011) Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education, 57: 2156–2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M.Afflerbach, P. (1995) Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sheorey, R.Mokhtari, K. (2001) Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29: 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singhal, M. (2004) Teaching reading to adult second language learners. Mattoon, Illinois: United Graphics Inc.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. (2003) Extensive reading online: An overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19: 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., Grant, D., Del Read, G.Rousseau, M. (2004) Promoting academic literacy with technology: Successful laptop programs in K-12 schools. System, 32(4): 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. (2010) Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55(3): 1193–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar