Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:58:48.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possibilities and challenges of learning German in a multimodal environment: A case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2016

Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams
Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams*
Affiliation:
University of California Santa Cruz (email: zabrams1@ucsc.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite a growing body of research on task-based language learning (TBLT) (Samuda & Bygate, 2008; Ellis, 2003), there is still little information available regarding the pedagogical design behind tasks and how they are implemented (Samuda & Bygate, 2008). Scholars in computer-mediated second language (L2) learning have called for research to fill in this gap by reflecting critically on task design and the subsequent implementation process (Fuchs, Hauck & Müller-Hartmann, 2012; Hampel, 2010; Hampel & Hauck, 2006; Hampel & Plaines, 2013; Hauck, 2010), instead of considering a task an “unproblematic fait accompli” (O’Dowd & Ware, 2009: 174). In response to this charge, the present case study provides a critical analysis of tasks carried out in a first-year German language course built around the weekly TV-series, Rosenheim-Cops (ZDF). These tasks drew from research on multimodality (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001; Norris & Maier, 2014) providing a framework for understanding how multiple semiotic systems work together to create meaning. The insights provided by this study have relevance for research on multimodal task design (Hampel & Hauck, 2006) through examining the possibilities and limitations of beginner second language (L2) learners’ effective use of authentic resources. The results suggest that the tasks encouraged semiotic awareness, helped activate referential knowledge useful for accessing multimodal resources, and elicited a positive response to authentic L2 use in context. The challenges of implementing these tasks included variation in learners’ engagement with authentic multimedia resources, either due to L2 skills levels or the level of interest in the particular resource used.

Keywords

task-based language learningmultimodalitymultimodal pedagogyfilm
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 28 , Special Issue 3: Multimodal Environments in CALL , September 2016 , pp. 343 - 363
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, R. (2007) New trends in using technology in the language curriculum. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27: 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. (2011) Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. The CALICO Journal, 28(2): 392–419.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Hauck, M. and Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012) Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 82–102.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M. (2014) The need for needs analysis in technology-mediated TBLT. In: González-Lloret, M. and Ortega, L. (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 23–50.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M. and Ortega, L. (eds.), (2014) Introduction. Technology-mediated TBLT. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. (2010) Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In: Thomas, M. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Task-based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology. New York: Continuum, 131–153.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. and Hauck, M. (2006) Computer-mediated language learning: Making meaning in multimodal virtual learning spaces. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(2): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. and Pleines, C. (2013) Fostering student interaction and engagement in a virtual learning environment: An investigation into activity design and implementation. The CALICO Journal, 30(3): 342–370.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. (2010) The enactment of task design in telecollaboration in 2.0. In: Thomas, M. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. New York: Continuum, 197–217.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2014) Multimodal approaches. In: Norris, S. and Maier, C. D. (eds.), Interaction, Images and Texts. Boston, MA: de Gruyter, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kurek, M. and Hauck, M. (2014) Closing the digital divide: A framework for multiliteracy training. In: Guikema, J. P. and Lawrence, W. (eds), Digital Literacies in Foreign and Second Language Education. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004) Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, S. and Maier, C. D. (eds.), (2014) Introduction, Interaction, images and texts. Boston, MA: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. and Ware, P. (2009) Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2): 173–188.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2011) Modified, multiplied, and (re-)mixed: Social media and digital literacies. In: Thomas, M. (ed.), Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 9–35.Google Scholar
Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008) Tasks in second language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauro, S. (2011) SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 28(2): 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2011) Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (2004) Representation, rights, and resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom. In: Norton, B. and Toohey, K. (eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar