Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:31:51.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RECALL1: individual language tutoring through intelligent error diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Anja Krüger  and
Simon Hamilton
Anja Krüger
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück
Simon Hamilton
Affiliation:
Exlingua International
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

RECALL aims at providing intelligent error feedback to learners' input in a role-play scenario. This is achieved by integrating three intelligent modules into into system: a Diagnosis Module which analyses the learners' input, a Learner Module which reocrds errors made by the learner, and a Tutoring Module which provides exercises and offers feedback. In this paper the functionality of the RECALL system is described and the approach to error classification as well as the actual implementation of this approach is discussed. A pedagogical perspective on the navigational and teaching capabilities of RECALL are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 1997 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, P., John, R. S., Kronenberg, F., Krüger, A., Krumnack, U., Menzel, A., Reuer, V. & Unsöld, R. F. (1995) PROMISE Projektbericht, University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Catt, M. & Hirst, G. (1990) ‘An Intelligent CALL system for grammatical error analysis’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 3, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1981) Error Analysis and Interlanguage, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
D34 - User Studies Summary Report. RECALL. Report 1997.Google Scholar
Drubig, G. (1973) ‘Zur Analyse syntaktischer Fehlleistungen’. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur Fehleranalyse, Fehlerbewertung und Fehlertherapie, Berlin: Cornelsen-Velhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar
Fortune, A. (1992) ‘Self-study grammar practice: learners’views’, ELT Journal 46 (2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, (1981) Second Language Learning and Second Lanuage Acquisition, Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krüger, A., Dittman, H. & Murphy, M. (1997) ‘Grammar Based Error Diagnosis in CALL’. To appear in Informatics Research Reports, University of Ulster, Autumn.Google Scholar
Krüger, A. & Ronthaler, M. (1997) Intelligente Systemreaktionen in CALL Software. Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics, IBM Germany, Scientific Centre, Heidelberg: IBM Deutschland.Google Scholar
Krüger-Thielmann, K. (1992) Wissensbasierte Sprachlernsysteme: Neue Möglickeiten für den computerunterstützten Sprachunterricht, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Legenhausen, L. (1975) Fehleranalyse und Fehlerbewertung, Berlin: Cornelsen-Velhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar
Menzel, W. (1992) Modellbasierte Fehlerdiagnose in Sprachlehrsystemen. Sprache und Information Bd. 24, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mellish, C. (1989) ‘Some Chart-Based Techniques for Parsing Ill-Formed Input’. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 102–109. Association for Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. & McTear, M. F. (1997) ‘Learner Modelling for Intelligent CALL’. 6th International Conference on User Modeling, Sardinia, June.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (1973) ‘Grundsätzliches zur Fehleranalyse und Fehlerbewertung’. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur Fehlerbewertung und Fehlertherapie, Berlin: CornelsenVelhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar
Raabe, H. (1980) ‘Der Fehler beim Fremdsprachenerwerb und Fremdsprachengebrauch’. In Cherubim, D. (ed.): Beiträge zum Problem der sprachlichen Abweichung, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1971) ‘Error Analysis and Second Language Strategies’, Language Sciences 17, 12–22.Google Scholar
Schoelles, M. & Hamburger, H. (1996) ‘Cognitive tools for language pedagogy’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 9 (2), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwind, C. (1994) ‘Error analysis and wxplanation in knowledge based language tutoring’. In Appelo, L. and de Jong, F. M. G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Twente Workshop on Language Technology (TWLT 7), University of Twente, 77–91.Google Scholar
Schuscter, E. (1986) ‘The role of native grammars in correcting errors in second language learning’, Computational Intelligence 2, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar