Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:53:36.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second language acquisition and the computer: variation in second language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Christopher Zähner
Christopher Zähner
Affiliation:
UMIST, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I will argue that learner variation in second language acquisition poses a potentially serious problem for the successful design and application of CALL and ICALL software'. Whereas a teacher is able to use direct and immediate feedback from students to adapt to different learning styles, rates of progress and acquisition paths, the possibilities of computer software are much more limited.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1995 , pp. 34 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Nicholas, H. 'Learner variation and the teachability hypothesis' in Hyltenstamm, K. and Pienemann, M. (eds) Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1985, pp 177–195.Google Scholar
2Bowerman, C. 'Tutoring in an ITS for German writing: the student-tutorial module synergy' in Proceedings of the ICALL Workshop, UMIST, September 1991, CTICML, University of Hull, PP 1–11.Google Scholar
3Imlah, W. and duBoulay, B. Boulay, B. 'Robust Natural Language Parsing in Computer-Assisted Language Instruction' System, 137–147,1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Menzel, W.Modellbasierte Fehlerdiagnose in Sprachlehrsystemen, Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1992.Google Scholar
5Ellis, R.Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Learing in the Classroom, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
6Bowerman, C. 'Writing and the computer: an intelligent tutoring system solution' in Kibby, M. and Hartley, R. (eds.) Computer Assisted Learning, Oxford: Pergamon, 1992, pp 77–83.Google Scholar
7Skinner, B. F.Verbal Behaviour, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Lado, R.Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
9Chomsky, N. 'Review of B.F. Skinner Verbal Behaviour' Language, 35, 1959, pp 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wolff, J. G. 'Language acquisition, data compresson, and generalization' Language and Communication, 2, 1982, pp 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Anderson, J. R. 'Induction of augmented transition networks' Cognitive Science, 1, 125–157, 1977.Google Scholar
12Langley, P. 'A production system model of first language acquisition', in Proceedings Eighth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Tokyo, Japan, 1980, pp 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Langley, P. 'Language acquisition through error recovery' Cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 1982, pp 211–255.Google Scholar
14Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. 'Competition, Variation. And Language Learning', in MacWhinney, B. (ed). Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987 pp. 157–193.Google Scholar
15MacWhinney, B. 'The Competition Model' in MacWhinney, B. (ed). Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1987, pp 249–308.Google Scholar
16Chomsky, N. 'On Cognitive Structures and their Development' in Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.). Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
17Chomsky, N.Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.Google Scholar
18Pienemann, M. 'Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages' Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 1984, pp 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Newmark, L. and Reibel, D. 'Necessity and sufficiency in language learning' International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 1968, pp 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Krashen, S. and Terrel, T.The Natural Method: Language Acquisition in the Classroom, Oxford: Pergamon, 1984.Google Scholar
21Matthews, R. and Demopoulos, W. (eds) Learnability and Linguistic Theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Frazier, L. and de, Villiers J. (eds) Language Processing and Language Acquisition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Cook, V.Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, London: MacMillan. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Meisel, J., Clashen, H. and Pienemann, M. 'On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition' Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 3. 1981, pp 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Pienemann, op cit. 1984.Google Scholar
26Pienemann, M. 'Learnability and syllabus construction' in Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M. (eds). Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1985.Google Scholar
27Ellis, op cit.Google Scholar
28Macken, M.A. 'Representation, Rules and Overgeneralization in Phonology' in MacWhinney, B. (ed). Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987. pp 367–397.Google Scholar
29Pinker, S. 'The Bootstrapping Problem inLanguage Acquisition' in MacWhinney, B. (ed) Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987, pp 339–441.Google Scholar
30Givon, T.Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume 1, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Givon, T.Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1990.Google Scholar
32Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
33Lakoff, and Johnson, op cit.Google Scholar
34Deane, P. D.Grammar in Mind and Brain. Explorations in Cognitive Syntax, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Lakoff, G.Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Deane, op cit.Google Scholar
37Deane, op cit.Google Scholar
38Langacker, R.Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
39Keil, F. C. 'Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development' Psychological Review, 88, 1981, pp 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Deane, op cit. p 230.Google Scholar
41Langacker, R.Foundations of cognitive grammar, 1, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
42Deane, op cit.Google Scholar
43Anderson, J. R.The Architecture of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
44Deane, op cit.Google Scholar