Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:45:06.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tool mediation in Focus on Form activities: case studies in a grammar-exploring environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2007

PETTER KARLSTRÖM
Affiliation:
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology, Forum 100, SE-164 40 Kista, Sweden. petter@dsv.su.se
TERESA CERRATTO-PARGMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology, Forum 100, SE-164 40 Kista, Sweden. tessy@dsv.su.se
HENRIK LINDSTRÖM
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. henrik.lindstroem@gmail.com
OLA KNUTSSON
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. knutsson@csc.kth.se

Abstract

We present two case studies of two different pedagogical tasks in a Computer Assisted Language Learning environment called Grim. The main design principle in Grim is to support ‘Focus on Form’ in second language pedagogy. Grim contains several language technology-based features for exploring linguistic forms (static, rule-based and statistical), intended to be used while writing. Our question is, in what ways does Grim support Focus on Form in actual classroom use. We have explored this question within sociocultural theory, emphasizing tool mediation and how tools shape the learner’s activity. The first case concerns a text-reconstruction exercise in which students worked in a pair within the Grim environment. The second case was conducted with another group of students, who engaged in collaborative revision of texts, written in advance by one of the students, in student pairs. In both studies, students were instructed and encouraged to use the different features of Grim. Data was collected by recording dialogue during the sessions with Grim. Our results show how learners put the features of Grim into use in their writing tasks. In some instances, the program was used creatively, in combination with external tools such as the users’ own dictionaries, knowledge of other languages, or teachers. In other instances, we note that Grim was used for error correction, rather than as a language resource. The learners’ activities are thus transformed by their use of the program, from the tasks of revision and text-reconstruction into error correction. The application shapes the activity, in conjunction with the pedagogical tasks. We argue for studying the activities of students with CALL tools, in order to find out in detail how tasks and technology concur in use and what view on language and pedagogy they mediate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)