Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:04:25.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Nicolas Guichon
Nicolas Guichon
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon 2, Laboratoire ICAR, bâtiment FILTRE, 5, avenue Pierre Mendès-France 69500 Bron, France (email: nicolas.guichon@univ-lyon2.fr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article sets out to identify key competencies which language tutors need to develop in order to manage synchronous online teaching. In order to aptly monitor interactions with distant learners, it is proposed that three types of regulation pertaining to socio-affective, pedagogical and multimedia aspects are required. On the one hand, this research aims at specifying these competencies and, on the other hand, it seeks to identify the relevance of reflective analysis for professional development.

The context of this study is a teacher training programme for Masters Degree students in teaching French as a foreign language that provides trainees with the opportunity of teaching online to intermediate-level students of French from a North American university via a desktop videoconferencing platform. This programme first endeavours to put trainees in a professional situation by getting them to prepare and administer sessions in order to confront them with the specific challenges of synchronous online tutoring. Second, it seeks to help them to gain insight into their own activity by developing critical thinking towards their own practice.

The data elicited for this research derive from the tutor trainees’ interpretations of their own practice when confronted with the film of their own situated activity. The episodes chosen by the trainees to feed the self-confrontation process constitute significant units because by being told and commented upon, they elucidate how and to what extent competencies are built. Three discursive strategies have been identified and used to organise the content analysis of the data: description; expression of a difficulty; reflective review of the activity. The strategies used by trainees to verbalise their own activity can inform teacher educators about the constraints of the work situation and about the resources trainees need to deploy to face up to this unknown professional situation.

Results indicate that trainees concentrate particularly on pedagogical aspects that distance and faulty technology have rendered complex. The encountered difficulties are equally distributed between a repertoire of competencies pertaining to language teaching and competencies more directly linked with online teaching. Finally, this study has enabled us to assess the potential of self-confrontation for teacher practice and leads us to propose directions for improving this training device.

Keywords

Teacher educationdesktop videoconferencingcritical analysiscompetenciesself-confrontationsynchronous computer-mediated communication
Type
Original Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 166 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, K. A.Gall, M. D. (1987) Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Allal, L. (2007) Régulation des apprentissages: orientation conceptuelle pour la recherche et la pratique en éducation. In: Allal, L. and Mottier Lopez, L. (eds.), Régulation des apprentissages en situation scolaire et en formation. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdet, J.-F. (2006) Construction d’un espace virtuel et rôles du tuteur. In: Dejean-Thircuir, C. and Mangenot, F. (eds.), Les échanges en ligne dans apprentissage et la formation. CLE International, 32–43.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1991) Car la culture donne forme à l’esprit. Paris: Georg Eshel.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. (1997) Educating online: Creating the virtual classroom community. ERIC ED 412 934.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2003) English Language Learning and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M. (2005) L’accompagnement à l’autoformation en langue étrangère: Contribution à l’analyse des pratiques professionnelles. Université Nancy 2. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1995) A tutorial on situated learning. In: Self, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on computers and Education (Taiwan). Charlottesville, VA: AACE, 49–70.Google Scholar
Clark, R. C. (2005) Multimedia learning in E-courses. In: Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: CUP, 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clot, Y. (1999) La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Develotte, C., Guichon, N. Kern, R. (in press) Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon… Vous nous voyez bien? Etude d’un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone franco-américain à travers les discours de ses usagers. Alsic, 11(2): 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (2000) Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2006) Learning in context. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erben, T. (1999) Constructing learning in a virtual immersion bath: LOTE teacher education through audiographics. In: Debski, R. and Levy, M. (eds.), WORLDCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, 229–248.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007) Reflective language teaching. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Guichon, N. Drissi, S. (in press) Tutorat de langue par visioconférence: comment former aux régulations pédagogiques? Les cahiers de l’ACEDLE, 5(1): 185–217.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2006) Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1): 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R.Stickler, U. (2005) New skills for new classrooms: training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4): 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson-Smith, E. (2006) Communities of practice for pre- and in-service teacher education. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P.Levy, M. (eds.) (2006) Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, L. (2000) Getting connected: Online learning for the EFL professional. ERIC document number 447298.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C.Laffey, J. (2005) The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: CUP, 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. M.Youngs, B. L. (2006) Teacher preparation for online language instruction. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonnaert, P.Vander Borght, C. (2003) Créer des conditions d’apprentissage, un cadre de référence socioconstructiviste pour une formation didactique des enseignants. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
Lamy, M.-N.Hampel, R. (2007) Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linard, M.Prax, I. (1984) Images vidéo, images de soi… ou Narcisse au travail. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Lyceum 3.6 (1999–2002). The Open University, UK. System development: Samuel Marshall, Matthew Brown. Project management: Barbara Everatt.Google Scholar
Marchand, L.Loisier, J. (2005) Pratiques d’apprentissage en ligne. Montréal: Les éditions de la Chenelière.Google Scholar
Olson, M. R. (1995) Conceptualizing narrative authority: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 11: 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastré, P. (2005) Genèse et identité. In: Rabardel, P. and Pastré, P. (eds.), Modèles du sujet pour la conception. Dialectiques activités et développement. Toulouse: Octarès, 231–260.Google Scholar
Peraya, D. (2000) Le cyberespace : un dispositif de communication et de formation médiatisées. In: Alava S. (ed.), Cyberespaces et formations ouvertes. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université, 17–42.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1975) L’équilibration des structures cognitives: problème central du développement. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1986) Du texte à l’action. Paris: Le Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1994) Le praticien réflexif. À la recherche du savoir caché dans l’agir professionnel. Montréal: Les Editions Logiques.Google Scholar
Slaouti, D.Motteram, G. (2006) Reconstructing practice. Language teacher education and ICT. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, C. (1998) A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL quarterly, 32: 584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theureau, J. (1992) Le cours d’action: analyse sémio-logique. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tripp, D. (1993) Critical incidents in teaching: developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vermersch, P. (1994) L’entretien d’explicitation en formation initiale et continue. Paris: ESF.Google Scholar
Vetter, A. (2004) Les spécificités du tutorat à distance à l’Open University: enseigner les langues avec Lyceum. Alsic, 7: 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2002) A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL quarterly, 36(3): 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar