Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:54:36.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment fixer les cours de change? Annonces et correspondances maastrichtiennes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Jean-Sébastien Pentecôte  and
Marc-Alexandre Sénégas
Jean-Sébastien Pentecôte
Affiliation:
CERESUR, Université de la Réunion
Marc-Alexandre Sénégas
Affiliation:
GRAPE, Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV
Get access

Résumé

Cette étude revient sur la distinction établie entre deux règles de fixation irrévocable des cours de change: une règle temporelle suivant laquelle le gel de la parité est programmé à une date arbitraire; une règle d'état sous laquelle cette décision résulte de l'atteinte d'un seuil par les déterminants fondamentaux. En les replaçant dans un cadre d'analyse commun, ces stratégies apparaisent en fait rigoureusement équivalentes en l'absence d'incertitude sur le déroulement de la transition. Une correspondance en termes probabilistes est établie dans un contexte stochastique plus général. Ce cadre d'analyse unifié s'avère un préalable utile pour entreprendre une relecture de la stratégie maastrichtienne en matière cambiaire et mettre à jour certaines propriétés du scénario finalement adopté par les autorités européennes.

Summary

Summary

This analysis questions the distinction between two exchange rate fixing rules: a “time-dependent” rule under which the exchange rate is fixed at an arbitrarily given date; a “state-dependent” rule under which the irrevocable switch to a peg occurs when the fundamentals reach a given threshold value. By replacing them in a common analytical framework, we underline the strict equivalence between the two rules if the fundamentals follow a purely deterministic process during the transition. In a broader stochastic context, a correspondence in probabilistic terms prevails between these strategies. This unified approach allows a new assessment of the Maastricht way to EMU as regards exchange rates. In particular, we emphasize some properties of the scenario which was finally adopted by the European monetary authorities.

Keywords

UEMrègles temporelles et d'étatpassage aux changes fixesE4E5F3EMUstate- and time-dependent rulesswitch to fixed exchange ratesE4E5F3
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , 2003 , pp. 39 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

CERESUR, Université de la Réunion, 15, Avenue René Cassin, B.R 7151, 97715 Saint-Denis Messag, Cedex 9, La Réunion, FRANCE E-mail: pentecot@univ-reunion.fr

**

GRAPE, Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV, Avenue Léon Duguit, 33608 Pessac Cedex, FRANCE E-mail: senegas@montesquieu.u-bordeaux.fr

References

Bibliographie

Bean, C. (1992), Economie and monetary union in Europe, Journal of Economie Perspectives, 6, n°4, automne, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Begg, D., Giavazzi, F., von Hagen, J. et Wyplosz, C. (1997), EMU : getting the end-game right, Londres, Center for Economic Policy Research, février.Google Scholar
Bertola, G. (1994), Continuous-time models of exchange rates and intervention, chapitre 9 in van der Ploeg, F. (ed), The handbook of international macroeconomics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Basil Blackwell, pp. 251–298.Google Scholar
Calomiris, Ch. (1994), Greenback resumption and silver risk : the economics and politics of monetary regime change in the United States, 1862–1900, chapitre 4 in Bordo, M. et Cappie, F. (eds), Monetary regimes in transition, Cambridge (RU), Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–132.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. (1996), How to fix conversion rates at the start of EMU?, CEPR Discussion Paper, n°1530, novembre.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. (1998), L'indétermination des cours de conversion de l'euro, Revue d'Economie Politique, 108, n°2, mars-avril, pp. 136–156.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. et Spaventa, L., (1997), Setting conversion rates for the third stage of EMU, CEPR Discussion Paper, n°1638, avril.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P., Dewachter, H. et Veestraeten, D. (1998), Stochastic process switching and stage III of EMU, CEPR Discussion Paper, n°1783, janvier.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P., Dewachter, H. et Veestraeten, D. (1999), Explaining recent European exchange rate stability, International Finance, 2, n°l, janvier, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Djajić, S. (1989), Dynamics of the exchange rate in anticipation of pegging, Journal of International Money and Finance, 8, n°4, décembre, pp. 559–571.Google Scholar
Flood, R. et Garber, P. (1983), A model of stochastic process switching, Econometrica, 51, n°3, mai, pp. 537–551.Google Scholar
Froot, K. et Obstfeld, M. (1991a), Stochastic process switching : some simple solutions, Econometrica, 59, n°l, janvier, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
Froot, K. et Obstfeld, M. (1991b), Exchange rate dynamics under stochastic regime shifts : A unified approach, Journal of International Economics, 31, n°3/4, novembre, pp. 203–229.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M., Miller, M. et Sutherland, A. (1992), Entering a preannounced currency band, chapitre 6 in Krugman, P. et Miller, M. (eds), Exchange rate targets and currency bands, Cambridge (RU), Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–81.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. (1991), The currency reform as the last stage of economic and monetary union : some policy questions, NBER Working Paper, n°3917, novembre.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T., Rosen, H. et Willard, K. (1995), Turning points in the Civil War : views from the Greenback market, NBER Working Paper, n°5381, décembre.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. (1985), Brownian motion and stochastic flow systems, J. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991), Target zones and exchange rate dynamics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, n°3, août, pp. 669–682.Google Scholar
Miller, M. et Sutherland, A. (1992), Britain's return to gold and entry into the EMS : Expectations, joining conditions and credibility, chapitre 7 in Krugman, P. et Miller, M. (eds), Exchange rate targets and currency bands, Cambridge (RU), Cambridge University Press, pp. 82–106.Google Scholar
Miller, M. et Sutherland, A. (1994), Speculative anticipations of sterling's return to gold : was Keynes wrong?, Economic Journal, 104, n°425, juillet, pp. 804–812.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. (1997), A strategy for launching the Euro, CEPR Discussion Paper, n°1732, octobre.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. et Stockman, A. (1985), Exchange rate dynamics, chapitre 18 in Jones, R. et Kenen, P. (eds), Handbook of international economics, 2, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, pp. 917–977.Google Scholar
Roncalli, Th. (1995), Initiation à la programmation sous GAUSS, 1 et 2, coll. Gauss Series, Paris, Global Design.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1991), Solution to a problem of stochastic process switching, Econometrica, 59, n°l, janvier, pp. 237–239.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1992), Britain's return to gold and entry into the EMS : Expectations, joining conditions and credibility : Discussion, in Krugman, P. et Miller, M. (eds), Exchange rate targets and currency bands, Cambridge (RU), Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–113.Google Scholar
Smith, G. et Smith, R. (1990), Stochastic process switching and the return to gold, Economic Journal, 100, n°399, mars, pp. 164–175.Google Scholar
Smith, G. et Smith, R. (1997), Greenback-gold returns and expectations of resumption, 1862–1879, Journal of Economic History, 57, n°3, septembre, pp. 697–717.Google Scholar
Sutherland, A. (1995), State- and time-contingent switches of exchange rate regime, Journal of International Economics, 38, n°3/4, mai, pp. 361–374.Google Scholar
Wasan, M. (1969), First passage time distribution of a Brownian motion with positive drift (inverse gaussian distribution), Queen's Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, n°19, Queen's University.Google Scholar