Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:39:30.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trigger values for (non-)residential structures and equipment investment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Marga Peeters
Marga Peeters*
Affiliation:
Economeric Research and Special Studies Department, De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Trigger values are derived for investment projects that are affected by uncertainty and construction periods. The importance of both aspects on the decision to invest is shown by simulation results and empirically corroborated by estimation results obtained with national (non-)residential structures and equipment data. The main conclusion is that time-to-build projects faced with uncertainty, like non-residential structures, are disproportionally more affected than projects that do not have either of these aspects.

Résumé

Résumé

Dans cet article, les valeurs limites de rentabilité, pour des projets d'investissement qui sont affectés et par les périodes de construction et par l'incertitude, sont dérivées. L'importance des ces deux aspects sur la décision d'investir est démontré par des résultats de simulation et est corroboré empiriquement par les résultats obtenus lors de l'estimation sur des données nationales (non-)résidentielles de structure et d'équipement. La conclusion principale est que des projets confrontés à un timing de construction et à de l'incertitude sont beaucoup plus affectés que des projets n'ayant pas ces sensibilités.

Keywords

E22G31C32E22G31C32
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , 1997 , pp. 171 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

This paper was written when I was a research fellow at the Université Catholique de Louvain. For financial support I gratefully acknowledge the Economics Department in Louvain-La-Neuve and a HCM-grant of the European Community at the University of Warwick. For comments on this paper I want to thank an anonymous referee, Pierre Mella-Barral, Paul Ghijsen and Ramón Ruiz Tamarit.

References

REFERENCES

Altug, S., [1989], Time-to-build and aggregate fluctuations: Some new evidence, International Economic Review, 30(4), pp. 889–920.Google Scholar
Altug, S., [1993], Time-to-build, delivery lags, and the equilibrium pricing of capital goods, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(3), pp. 301–319.Google Scholar
Bar-Ilan, A., Sulem, A. and Zanello, A. [1993], Time-to-build and capacity choice, Mimeo, presented at the European Economic Association, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Bernanke, B.S., [1983], Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and cyclical investment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
Bertola, G., and Caballero, R.J. [1994], Irreversibility and aggregate investment, Review of Economic Studies, 61(2), pp. 223–246.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.J., [1991], On the sign of investment-uncertainty relationship, The American Economic Review, 81(1), pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.J., and Pindyck, R.S. [1992], Uncertainty, investment, and industry evolution, NBER Working Paper, n° 4160Google Scholar
Dixit, A. [1989], Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty, Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), pp. 620–638.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., [1991], A simplified treatment of the theory of optimal regulation of brownian motion, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15(4), pp. 657–673.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., [1992], Investment and hysteresis, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(1), pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Pyndyck, R. [1994], Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Driver, C., and MoretóN, D. [1992], Investment, Expectations and Uncertainty, Oxford – Cambridge, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D., [1963], Capital theory and investment behaviour, American Economic Review, 53(2), pp. 247–259.Google Scholar
Karlin, S., and Taylor, H. [1975], A First Course in Stochastic Process, 2nd. edition, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kydland, F.E., and Prescott, E.C. [1982], Time to build and aggregate investment, Econometrica, 50(6), pp. 1345–70.Google Scholar
Majd, S. and Pindyck, R.S. [1987], Time-to-build, option value, and investment decisions, Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Mayer, T., [1960], Plant and equipment lead times, The Journal of Business, 33(1), pp. 127–132.Google Scholar
Meersman, H., and Cassimon, D. [1994], Investment in the EC-countries: Does reducing uncertainty matter?, SESO Discussion Paper 95/320, Antwerp University (UFSIA), Belgium.Google Scholar
Mella-Barral, P., [1995], Sequential reorganisation of corporate debt contracts, DAE Working Papers, Amalgamated Series, n° 9501, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Peeters, M. [1995], Time-To-Build: Interrelated Investment and Labour Demand with Applications to Six OECD Countries, Lecture notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems n° 420, Berlin, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.S., [1993], Investments of uncertain cost, Journal of Financial Economics, 34(1), pp. 53–76.Google Scholar