Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T13:51:44.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does analytic theology belong in the public university?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2023

Kevin Schilbrack Open the ORCID record for Kevin Schilbrack [Opens in a new window]
Kevin Schilbrack*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
*
Email: schilbrackke@appstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An overarching question in William Wood's Analytic Theology and the Academic Study of Religion concerns the conditions under which theology belongs in the public university. On this question, many or most academics today are methodological naturalists, and they would not accept explanations that appeal to supernatural entities. Wood devotes a chapter to arguing against that position. Nevertheless, Wood is not a ‘sectarian’ who argues that Christian theology should only answer to its own, tradition-specific norms, and so it is important to see how close his proposal and methodological naturalism (MN) actually are. In this response, I seek to clarify both MN and Wood's proposal regarding the proper norms for academic inquiry. Key to my argument is a distinction between a MN based on strict or scientific naturalism and a MN based on liberal or expansive naturalism. Analytic theologians and expansive naturalists can agree both that a theology that operates according to proper norms for academic inquiry belongs in the public university and that strict naturalism is not the norm that we want.

Type
Book Symposium
Information
Religious Studies , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cady, LE and Brown, D (eds) (2002) Religious Studies, Theology, and the University: Conflicting Maps, Changing Terrain. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
De Caro, M and Macarthur, D (eds) (2008) Naturalism in Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Caro, M and Macarthur, D (eds) (2010) Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
De Caro, M and Macarthur, D (eds) (2022) The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F (2014) God, Value, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F (2021) Nature, enchantment, and God. In Meijer, M and De Vriese, H (eds), The Philosophy of Reenchantment. London: Routledge, pp. 178–194.Google Scholar
Ellis, F (2022) Liberal naturalism and God. In De Caro, M and Macarthur, D (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. London: Routledge, pp. 218–226.Google Scholar
Kauffman, SA (2019) A World beyond Physics: The Emergence and Evolution of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, M (2015) Profane theology. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 27, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidenhag, J (2021) Minding Creation: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation. London: T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, TA (2015) Why Philosophy Matters for the Study of Religion – and Vice Versa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, PA Jr. (2017) Christian Theology and the Secular University. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, J (2022) Liberal naturalism, aesthetic reflection, and the sublime. In De Caro M and Macarthur D (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. London: Routledge, pp. 281–297.Google Scholar
Meijer, M and De Vriese, H (eds) (2021) The Philosophy of Reenchantment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paseau, A (2016) Naturalism in the philosophy of mathematics. In Zalta EN (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter edition). Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/naturalism-mathematics/.Google Scholar
Price, H (1997) Naturalism and the fate of the M-worlds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71, 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, M (2014) Worlds without End: The Many Lives of the Multiverse. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schilbrack, K (2018) A better methodological naturalism. In Blum, JN (ed.), The Question of Methodological Naturalism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 251–275.Google Scholar
Schilbrack, K (2022) Committing theology in the secular academy. In LeRon Shults, F and Neville, RC (eds), Religion in Multidisciplinary Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
Strawson, PF (1985) Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, W (2018) Effing the Ineffable: Existential Mumblings at the Limits of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, W (2021) Analytic Theology and the Academic Study of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar