No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Van Harvey's The Historian and the Believer appeared nearly a century after W. K. Clifford's ‘The ethics of belief’. Harvey is critical of the epistemological supports of religious belief in a way strikingly similar to Clifford's criticisms. But Clifford's view did not go uncriticized in the intervening period. William James for instance used Clifford's essay as a foil for his argument in ‘The will to believe’. Now here is Clifford's argument again offered in twentieth century garb in Harvey's book. That a view so similar to Clifford's can arise again a century later, and after strong criticism, suggests that there is some important integrity to that view, and that that view strikes a responsive chord in the ear of many contemporary human beings. This paper intends therefore to examine Clifford's and Harvey's works in order to uncover what makes their shared view attractive.
page 551 note 1 Clifford, W. K., ‘The ethics of belief’, The Contemporary Review XXLX (Dec. 1876–05 1877), p. 295.Google Scholar
page 551 note 2 Clifford, , p. 294.Google Scholar
page 552 note 1 Ibid
page 552 note 2 Harvey, Van, The Historian and the Believer (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1969), p. 33.Google Scholar
page 552 note 3 On this point, see Harvey, , p. 39.Google Scholar
page 554 note 1 Clifford, , p. 296.Google Scholar
page 554 note 2 Clifford, , p. 300.Google Scholar
page 554 note 3 Clifford, , p. 306.Google Scholar
page 555 note 1 Harvey, , p. 103.Google Scholar
page 555 note 2 Harvey, , p. 81.Google Scholar
page 555 note 3 Harvey, , p. 103.Google Scholar
page 556 note 1 Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology, Volume Three (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1963), p. 141.Google Scholar
page 556 note 2 Harvey, , pp. 117–18.Google Scholar
page 557 note 1 Aristotle, . The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, Inc., 1941), p. 936.Google Scholar