Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:53:09.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naturalism and the success of science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

PETER HARRISON Open the ORCID record for PETER HARRISON [Opens in a new window]
PETER HARRISON*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia
*
e-mail: iash.ea@uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methodological naturalism is usually regarded as compatible with a range of religious commitments on the part of scientific practitioners and it is typically assumed that methodological naturalism does not imply metaphysical naturalism. Against this, it has been argued that the cumulative success of the sciences, conducted in conformity with the principle of methodological naturalism, actually provides compelling evidence for the truth of metaphysical naturalism. In this article I assess the argument for naturalism from the history of science and suggest that it is deficient in a number of ways. There may be reasons for adopting naturalism, but the history of science is not the place to look for them.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 274 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertus, Magnus (1890) De generatione et corruption, in Borgnet, Augusti (ed.) B. Alberti Magni Opera omnia, IV (Paris: Ludovicum Vivès).Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter (1999) ‘Boyle on occasionalism: an unexamined source’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1886) In libros Aristotelis De caelo et mundo expositio, in Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, III (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. S. C. de Propaganda Fide, Romae).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1734) The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning (London).Google Scholar
Bartlett, Robert (2008) The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard (1838) The Works of Richard Bentley, DD., ed. Dyce, Alexander III: Theological Writings (London: Macpherson).Google Scholar
Bonk, Thomas (2008) Underdetermination: An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudry, Maarten, Blancke, Stefaan, & Braeckman, Johan (2010) ‘How not to attack intelligent design creationism’, Foundations of Science, 15, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1674) The Excellency of Theology compar'd with Natural Philosophy (London).Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1688) A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things (London).Google Scholar
Brightman, Edgar Sheffield (1937) ‘An empirical approach to God’, The Philosophical Review, 46, 157–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1993) ‘Mind–body causation and explanatory practice’, in Heil, John & Mele, Alfred (eds) Mental Causation (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 97–120.Google Scholar
Busch, Jacob (2008) ‘No new miracles, same old tricks’, Theoria, 72, 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2005) ‘No God; no laws’, in Sindoni, Elio & Moriggi, Stefano (eds) Dio, la Natura e la Legge. God and the Laws of Nature (Milan: Angelicum-Mondo X), 183–190.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2008) The Dappled World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy & Ward, Keith (eds) (2016) Rethinking Order: After the Order of Nature (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1738) The Works of Samuel Clarke, D.D., 2 vols (London).Google Scholar
Clarke, Steve (2009) ‘Naturalism, science and the supernatural’, Sophia, 48, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1859) On the Origin of Species (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
De Lubac, Henri (1946) Surnaturel: études historiques (Paris: Aubier).Google Scholar
De Vries, Paul (1986) ‘Naturalism in the natural sciences’, Christian Scholar's Review, 15, 388–396.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter (2006) The Intelligibility of Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René (1985) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols, Cottinghman, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (trs) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Draper, Paul (2007) ‘God, science, and naturalism’, in Wainwright, William (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 272–303.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1906–1913) Études sur Leonard de Vinci, 3 vols (Paris: A Hermann & Sons).Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1913) Le système du monde, I (Paris: A Hermann & Sons).Google Scholar
Fahrbach, Ludwig (2011) ‘How the growth of science ends theory change’, Synthese, 180, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Barbara (2000) ‘Philosophical naturalism and methodological naturalism: clarifying the connection’, Philo, 3, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J. (1991) ‘God's general concurrence with secondary causes: why conservation is not enough’, Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 553–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost-Arnold, Greg (2010) ‘The no-miracles argument for realism: inference to an unacceptable explanation’, Philosophy of Science, 77, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galileo, Galilei [1632] (1962) Dialogue concerning the two Chief World Systems, Drake, Stillman (tr.) (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Gasser, Georg & Stefan, Matthias (2007) ‘The heavy burden of proof for ontological naturalism’, in Gasser, Georg (ed.) How Successful is Naturalism? (Berlin: De Gruyter), 159–182.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward (1969) ‘Medieval and seventeenth-century conceptions of an infinite void space beyond the cosmos’, Isis, 60, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Edward (1974) A Source Book in Medieval Science (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Grant, Edward (1979) ‘The Condemnation of 1277, God's absolute power, and physical thought in the late Middle Ages’ Viator, 10, 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, Hans (2016) ‘What is methodological naturalism?’, in Clark, Kelly James (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism (Oxford: Blackwell), 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter (2013) ‘Laws of nature in seventeenth-century England: from Cambridge Platonism to Newtonianism’, in Watkins, Eric (ed.) The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives (New York: Oxford University Press), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (2004) ‘Metaphysics and the origins of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature’, Early Science and Medicine, 9, 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, John (1830) A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, & Green, & J. Taylor).Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary (1976) ‘Truth and the growth of scientific knowledge’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 261–280.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger et al. (eds) (2005) Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter (Münster: Aschendorff).Google Scholar
Keeley, Brian L. (2016) ‘Natural mind’, in Clark, Kelly James (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism (Oxford: Blackwell), 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993) The Advancement of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1971) ‘Notes on Lakatos’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1971) ‘History of science and its rational reconstruction’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 91–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1981) ‘A confutation of convergent realism’, Philosophy of Science 48, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1990) ‘Demystifying underdetermination’, in Savage, C. Wade (ed.) Scientific Theories (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 267–297.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Gregory (2009) ‘Planetary science: the solar system's extended shelf life’, Nature, 459, 781–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, David C. (ed.) (1978) Science in the Middle Ages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Livingstone, David N. (2003) ‘Re-placing Darwinism and Christianity’, in Lindberg, David C. & Numbers, Ronald L. (eds) When Science and Christianity Meet (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 183–202.Google Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. (2003) ‘Explaining the success of a scientific theory’, Philosophy of Science, 70, 891–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. (2006) ‘Scientific realism and the strategema de divide et impera’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. (2013) ‘A historically informed modus ponens against scientific realism: articulation, critique, and restoration’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27, 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, Ian (2006) ‘The “sceptical crisis” reconsidered: Galen, rational medicine and the libertas philosophandi’, Early Science and Medicine, 11, 247–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milton, J. R. (1998) ‘Laws of nature’, in Garber, Daniel & Ayers, Michael (eds) The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 2 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), I, 680–701.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Moti (2013) ‘The pessimistic induction: a bad argument gone too far’, Synthese, 190, 3209–3226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John (1991) ‘Pierre Duhem and the History of Late Medieval Science and Philosophy in the Latin West’, in Maier, Alfonso and Imbach, Ruedi (eds) Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra otto e novecento (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1706) Optice: Sive de Reflexionibus, Refractionibus, Inflexionibus & Coloribus (London).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1978) Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, 2nd edn, Cohen, I. Bernard (ed.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac [1713] (1999) The Principia, Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne (eds & trs) (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. (2007) ‘Science without God: natural laws and Christian beliefs’, in Numbers, Ronald L., Science and Christianity in Pulpit and Pew (New York: Oxford University Press), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David (2002) Thinking about Consciousness (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Seungbae (2011) ‘A confutation of the pessimistic induction’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, Lombard (1854) Sententiarum Quatuor Libri, in Migne, Jacques-Paul (ed.) Patrologia Latina, CXCI (Paris).Google Scholar
Poincaré, Henri (1905) Science and Hypothesis (London: Walter Scott).Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1999) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1975) Mathematics, Matter and Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rea, Michael (2002) World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, Michael (2016), ‘Naturalism and material objects’, in Craig, William J. & Moreland, J. P. (eds) Naturalism: A Critical Analysis (London: Routledge), 110–132.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander (2014) ‘Disenchanted naturalism’, in Bashour, Bana & Muller, Hans D. (eds) Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and its Implications (London: Routledge), 17–36.Google Scholar
Rossetter, Thomas (2018) ‘Realism on the rocks: novel success and James Hutton's theory of the earth’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, in press, <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.10.005>..' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.10.005>CrossRef.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rossetter,+Thomas+(2018)+‘Realism+on+the+rocks:+novel+success+and+James+Hutton's+theory+of+the+earth’,+Studies+in+History+and+Philosophy+of+Science,+in+press,+.>Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (ed.) (1987) Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Stanley, Matthew (2015) Huxley's Church and Maxwell's Demon: From Theistic Science and Naturalistic Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle (2002) ‘An antirealist explanation for the success of science’, Philosophy of Science, 67, 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle (2003) ‘No refuge for realism’, Philosophy of Science, 70, 913–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle (2006) Exceeding our Grasp (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. (1996) Deconstructing the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry (1996) ‘The charm of naturalism’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 70, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremaine, Scott (2011) ‘Is the solar system stable?’, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, <https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2011/tremaine-solar-system> [accessed 29 April 2017].+[accessed+29+April+2017].>Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas (2002) The Empirical Stance (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Vickers, Peter (2012) ‘Historical magic in old quantum theory?’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Peter (2013) ‘A confrontation of convergent realism’, Philosophy of Science, 80, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, William (1836) Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology (London: W. Pickering).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiston, William (1696) A New Theory of the Earth (London).Google Scholar
Wilson, David B. (2003) ‘Arbiters of Victorian science’, in Knox, Kevin C. & Noakes, Richard (eds) From Newton to Hawking: A History of Cambridge University's Lucasian Professors of Mathematics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 295–342.Google Scholar
Wray, K. Brad (2007) ‘A selectionist explanation of the success and failures of science’, Erkenntnis, 67, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, K. Brad (2010) ‘Selection and predictive success’, Erkenntnis, 72, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar