No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
People not only disagree about religious belief, but they disagree about what it is to disagree about religious belief; and consequently about what it would be for one religion to be uniquely true. What I shall try to do first is to characterise the nature of religious disagreement; and next to suggest in what the uniqueness of Christianity might consist.
page 429 note 1 Psychology and Religion, vol. II of the Collected Works, p. 104.
page 430 note 1 Perhaps there is some question whether he would; cf. E.G. Parrinder, Avatar and Incarnation. I owe this reference, and much valuable discussion relating to the whole of this paper, to Professor T.O. Ling.
page 431 note 1 ‘The History of Religions as a Preparation for the Cooperation of Religions’, in The History of Religions; ed. Eliade, M. and Kitagawa, J..Google Scholar
page 431 note 2 Religion in the Making, p. 66.
page 431 note 3 The Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 508.
page 433 note 1 I understand that most authorities would deny that the Virgin Birth of the Buddha is being suggested here; it is rather his immaculate conception.
page 433 note 2 Joel Carmichael, reviewing Allegro's, J. M.The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross, (Observer, 17·5·1970).Google Scholar
page 434 note 1 R. C. Zaehner, Religious Truth.
page 435 note 1 Zaehner, op. cit.