Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:36:52.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schellenberg's evolutionary religion: how evolutionary and how religious?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

WILLIAM A. ROTTSCHAEFER Open the ORCID record for WILLIAM A. ROTTSCHAEFER [Opens in a new window]
WILLIAM A. ROTTSCHAEFER*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR 97219, USA
*
e-mail: rotts@lclark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Evolutionary Religion, J. L. Schellenberg synthesizes his previous impressive contributions to an understanding of religion by formulating an account of religion supported by a Darwinian evolutionary theory understood as a science of the deep future. Such a future enables the realization that our present understandings of religion are immature, that future understandings of divine reality may be radically altered and that religious practice may become the centre of human well-being. In this article, I argue that Schellenberg's evolutionary religion represents at best but half the evolutionary story, its epistemic side. Ontologically, it remains fundamentally non-evolutionary. Positively, I suggest naturalistic alternatives to Schellenberg's Ultimate. I conclude that Schellenberg's evolutionary religion is neither adequately evolutionary nor adequately religious.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 475 - 496
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourke, Andrew F. G. (2011) Principles of Social Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubulia, Joseph, Sosis, Richard, Harris, Erica, Genet, Russell, Genet, Cheryl, & Karen, Wyman (eds) (2009) The Evolution of Religion: Studies, Theories and Critiques (San Margarita CA: Collins Foundation Press).Google Scholar
Crosby, Donald A. (2012) A Religion of Nature (Albany NY: SUNY Press).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: Charles Murray).Google Scholar
Fritzman, J. M. (2014) Hegel (Malden MA: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ursula (1998) The Scared Depths of Nature (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles & Reese, William L. (1953) ‘Introduction’, in Hartshorne, Charles & Reese, William (eds) Philosophers Speak of God (Chicago: Chicago University Press), 1–25.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel et al. (2013) Special Issue: Critical Essays on J. L. Schellenberg's Philosophy of Religion, Religious Studies, 49, Special Issue 2.Google Scholar
James, William (1897) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.).Google Scholar
James, William (1911) Some Problems in Philosophy (New York: Longmans, Green, & Co.).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2014) Life after Faith: The Case for Secular Humanism (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Peters, Karl E. (2002) Dancing with the Sacred: Evolution Ecology and God (Harrisburg PA: Trinity Press International).Google Scholar
Redding, Paul (2015) ‘Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/hegel/>.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter & Boyd, Robert (2005) Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rottschaefer, William A. (1998) The Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rue, Loyal (2006) Religion is not about God: How Spiritual Traditions Nurture our Biological Nature and What to Expect When They Fail (New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (1993) Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005) Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2007) The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2009) The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2013) Evolutionary Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2016) ‘God for all times: from theism to ultimism’, in Buckareff, Andrei & Nagasawa, Yujin (eds) Alternative Conceptions of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Frederick (ed.) (2003) Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality (Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Stenmark, Mikael (2012) ‘Religious naturalism and its rivals’, Religious Studies, 49, 529–550.Google Scholar
Tollefson, Deborah (2015) Groups as Agents (Malden MA: Polity).Google Scholar