Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:27:12.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social theory of the Trinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2018

RICHARD SWINBURNE
RICHARD SWINBURNE*
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford, OX1 4EW, UK
*
e-mail: richard.swinburne@oriel.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Subsequent to the fifth century until modern times all theologians agreed that God the Trinity is constituted by three persons (in Boethius's sense of ‘an individual substance of a rational nature’) who have a common divine essence, and are individuated only by their relations to each other. Having that essence entailed each being omnipotent and so perfectly good. In virtue of his perfect goodness the Father necessarily produces the Son (in order to have one equal whom to love and be loved by) and the Spirit (in order that the Son have one equal other than the Father to love and be loved by). There cannot be more than three divine persons because three persons are sufficient for the existence of unselfish love, and so any fourth divine person would be produced by an act which none of the three needed to produce, and so would not exist necessarily and so could not be divine. Necessarily if there is one divine person, there are three and only three divine persons.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Special Issue 3: Metaphysics of the Trinity: New Directions , September 2018 , pp. 419 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to classical and mediaeval texts and translations thereof are to traditional divisions and sub-divisions of those works – for example ‘Aquinas (1963–), Ia.11.3’ refers to article 3 of question 11 of Part I of Aquinas's Summa Theologiae.Google Scholar
Anselm, St (1998) Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works, Davies, B. & Evans, G. R. (trs & eds) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas (1963–1980) Summa Theologiae, Blackfrairs edition (London: Eyre and Spottiswood).Google Scholar
Aristotle (1983) On Interpretatione, Cooke, Harold P. (tr.), Loeb edition (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, St (1861) On Eight-Three Diverse Questions (Migne. Patrologia Latina vol 40.).Google Scholar
Augustine, St (1873) On The Trinity, Dods, M. (tr.) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Barth, Karl (1936) Church Dogmatics, Thomson, G. T. (tr.) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, St (1895) Letters, Jackson, B. (tr.) (Oxford: James Parker and Co.).Google Scholar
Boethius, (1968) Contra Eutychen and On The Consolation of Philosophy, Stewart, H. F. (tr.), Loeb edition (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2009) ‘Towards a tenable social trinitarianism’, in McCall, T. & Rea, M. C. (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 89–99.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard (2005) Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Denzinger, Henricus (1968), Enchiridion Symbolorum, 33rd edn (Rome: Herder).Google Scholar
Scotus, Duns (1950 –) Ordinatio in Omnia Opera, Balic, C. et al. (eds) (Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis).Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. (2010) Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, St (1954) ‘An Answer to Ablabius that we should not think of saying – there are three Gods’, Richardson, C. C. (tr.), in Hardy, E. R. (ed.) Christology of the Later Fathers (London: Westminster Press), 256–267.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (2013) Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
John of Damascus, St (1899) Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Salmond, S. D. F (tr.) (Oxford: James Parker and Co.).Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2004) ‘A Latin Trinity’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 304–333; reprinted in T. McCall & M. C. Rea (eds) Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 171–200.Google Scholar
Lossky, V. (2001) In the Image and Likeness of God (Crestwood NY: St Vladimir's Seminary Press).Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John (1974) A Study of Gregory Palamas, 2nd edn (Leighton Buzzard: The Faith Press.).Google Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen (1981) The Trinity and the Kingdom of God (London: SCM Press).Google Scholar
Paasch, J. T. (2012) Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Palmer, G. E. H. et al. (eds & trs) (1979–) The Philokalia (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Cornelius (1989) ‘Social Trinity and Tritheism’, in Feenstra, R. J. & Plantinga, C. (ed.) Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), 21–47.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl (1970) The Trinity (London: Burns & Oates).Google Scholar
Richard of St Victor (1958) De Trinitate (Paris: J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Stead, Christopher (1977) Divine Substance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1994) The Christian God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2008) Was Jesus God? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2013) Mind, Brain, and Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tanner, N. P. (ed.) (1990) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils (London: Sheed & Ward).Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1988) ‘And yet there are not three Gods but one God’, in Morris, Thomas V. (ed.) Philosophy and The Christian Faith (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press), 241–278.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith (2015) Christ and the Cosmos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ziziolilas, John (2002) Being as Communion (Crestwood NY: St Vladimir's Seminary Press).Google Scholar