Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:55:15.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic beliefs and Christian faith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2014

GREGORY W. DAWES
GREGORY W. DAWES*
Affiliation:
University of Otago, Dunedin, 9010New Zealand e-mail: gregory.dawes@otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In rejecting Plantinga's ‘reformed epistemology’, Jeremy Koons has argued that no beliefs are epistemically basic, since even perceptual beliefs arise from observations that are theory-dependent. But even if all observations are theory-dependent, not all theories are alike. Beliefs that are dependent on uncontroversial bodies of theory may be ‘basic’ in the sense that they play a foundational role in the acquisition of knowledge. There is, however, another problem with reformed epistemology. It is that even if Christian beliefs were basic in this sense, they could face evidential challenge, for the epistemic status of a ‘basic’ belief depends, in part, on its probabilistic or explanatory relations to our other beliefs. It follows that Christian faith remains vulnerable to evidential arguments, such as Paul Draper's argument from evil.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 61 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jonathan E. (1990) ‘Conservation and tacit confirmation’, Mind, 99, 559–570.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. (1991) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Alston, William P. (2005) Beyond ‘Justification’: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2003) Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Bishop, John & Aijaz, Imran (2004) ‘How to answer the de jure question about Christian belief’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 56, 109–129.Google Scholar
Dawes, Gregory W. & Jong, Jonathan (2012) ‘Defeating the Christian's claim to warrant’, Philo, 15, 127–144.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard (1986) The Blind Watchmaker (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Draper, Paul (1989) ‘Pain and pleasure: an evidential problem for theists’, Noûs, 23, 331–350.Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard & Conee, Earl (1985) ‘Evidentialism’, Philosophical Studies, 48, 15–34.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1984) ‘Observation reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science, 51, 23–43.Google Scholar
Goetz, Stewart C. (1983) ‘Belief in God is not properly basic’, Religious Studies, 19, 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, Susan (1993) Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Henderson, David & Horgan, Terence E. (2001) ‘Practicing safe epistemology’, Philosophical Studies, 102, 227–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Robin (1993) Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Magic, Religion and Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael (2001) Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Koons, Jeremy Randel (2011) ‘Plantinga on properly basic belief in God: lessons from the epistemology of perception’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 839–850.Google Scholar
Landesman, Charles (1993) The Eye and the Mind: Reflections on Perception and the Problem of Knowledge (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Pigden, Charles R. (2013) ‘Subversive explanations’, in Dawes, Gregory W. & Maclaurin, James (eds) A New Science of Religion (New York: Routledge), 145–161.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1993a) Warrant and Proper Function (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1993b) Warrant: The Current Debate (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2000) Warranted Christian Belief (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Robbins, J. Wesley (1983) ‘Is belief in God properly basic?’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 14, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tramel, Peter (2008) ‘Haack's foundherentism is a foundationalism’, Synthese, 160, 215–228.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin (2004). ‘Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free)?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78, 167–212.Google Scholar