Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T01:29:53.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A collaborative model of petitionary prayer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

GIANLUCA DI MUZIO
GIANLUCA DI MUZIO*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Philosophy, Political Science, and Religious Studies, Indiana University Northwest, 3400 Broadway, Gary, IN 46408, USA
*
e-mail: gdimuzio@iun.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Petitionary prayer appears pointless in light of divine attributes like omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence. Several philosophers have attempted to reinstate the significance of petitionary prayer by drawing attention to its indirect benefits. The article analyses the shortcomings in this strategy and defends a different solution to the difficulty. Conceiving of God as motivated by the desire to form a loving partnership with human beings allows one to formulate a collaborative account of petitionary prayer. On this model, God freely chooses to accede to some human requests in order to incorporate human desires and projects into His plan for the world.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 37 - 54
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basinger, David (1983) ‘Why petition an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good God?’, Religious Studies, 19, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basinger, David (1995) ‘Petitionary prayer: a response to Murray and Meyers’, Religious Studies, 31, 475–484.Google Scholar
Basinger, David (2004) ‘God does not necessarily respond to prayer’, in Peterson, Michael L. & VanArragon, Raymond J. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell), 255–264.Google Scholar
Davison, Scott A. (1999) ‘Divine providence and human freedom’, in Murray, Michael J. (ed.) Reasons for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids MI & Cambridge: Eerdmans), 217–237.Google Scholar
Davison, Scott A. (2009) ‘Petitionary prayer’, in Flint, Thomas P. & Rea, Michael C. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 286–305.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Joshua (1985) ‘On petitionary prayer’, Faith and Philosophy, 2, 21–29.Google Scholar
Masek, Lawrence (2001) ‘Petitionary prayer to an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 74, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Michael (2004) ‘God responds to prayer’, in Peterson, Michael L. & VanArragon, Raymond J. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell), 242–255.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. & Meyers, Kurt (1994) ‘Ask and it will be given to you’, Religious Studies, 30, 311–330.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (1979) ‘Petitionary prayer’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 81–91.Google Scholar