Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:03:52.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructivism, moral realism, and the possibility of Kant's rational religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2017

SAMUEL DUNCAN
SAMUEL DUNCAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Tidewater Community College, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
*
e-mail: sld24688@email.vccs.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I challenge Kantian constructivism both as an interpretation of Kant's own philosophical commitments and on its own merits as a moral theory, and argue in favour of a moral realist interpretation of Kant. I do so by focusing on Kant's own religious views and the question of whether a Kantian moral theory can be religiously neutral. I show that constructivist readings have severe problems on both fronts, while realist readings of Kant do not. This provides strong evidence that realist forms of Kantian ethics are preferable both as readings of Kant and as approaches to moral theory.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 455 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, Karl (2003) ‘On two non-realist interpretations of Kant's ethics’, in his Interpreting Kant's Critiques (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 263–282.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2013) ‘Is Kant a moral constructivist or a moral realist?’, European Journal of Philosophy, 21, 170–196.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2014) ‘The role of vulnerability in Kantian ethics’, in MacKenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, & Dodds, Susan (eds) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 88–109.Google Scholar
Hare, John (1996) The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment, Pluhar, Werner (tr.) (Indianapolis IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy, Gregor, Mary J. (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology, Wood, Allen W. & di Giovanni, George (trs & eds) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2010) ‘Moral consciousness and the “fact of reason”’, in Reath, Andrews (ed.) Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 55–72.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996) The Sources of Normativity, with Cohen, G. A., Geuss, Raymond, Nagel, Thomas, and Williams, Bernard, O'Neill, Onora (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (1988–1989) ‘Constructivisms in ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 79, 1–17.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (1990a) ‘The great maxims of charity and justice’, in her Constructions of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 219–234.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (1990b) ‘The public use of reason’, in her Constructions of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3–27.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (1992) ‘Vindicating reason’, in Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 280–308.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (1996) ‘Kant on reason and religion’, available at http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/o/oneill97.pdf.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Herman, Barbara (ed.) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2009) ‘Dignity and the formula of humanity’, in Timmermann, Jens (ed.) Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 102–118.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2012) Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, and Kierkegaard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Street, Sharon (2010) ‘What is constructivism in metaethics?’, Philosophy Compass, 5, 363–384.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2006), ‘Value without regress: Kant's formula of humanity revisited’, European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 69–93.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999), Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar