Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:22:33.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The freedom of Christ and explanatory priority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2013

TIMOTHY PAWL
TIMOTHY PAWL*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55105, USA e-mail: timpawl@stthomas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Call the claim, common to many in the Christian intellectual tradition, that Christ, in virtue of his created human intellect, had certain, infallible, exhaustive foreknowledge the Foreknowledge Thesis. Now consider what I will call the Conditional: if the Foreknowledge Thesis is true, then Christ's created human will was not free. In so far as many, perhaps all, of the people who affirm the Foreknowledge Thesis also wish to affirm the freedom of Christ's human will, the truth of the Conditional would be most unwelcome to them. I consider an argument in support of the Conditional; I argue that it is not successful.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 157 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, St Thomas (1980) Commentary on the Gospel of John, Fabian Larcher (tr.) (Albany NY: Magi Books).Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas (1954) The Disputed Questions on Truth (in Three Volumes), Robert Schmidt (tr.) (Chicago: Henry Regnery Company).Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas (1981) The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (tr.) (Notre Dame IN: Ave Maria Press).Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph (1998) Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the ‘De Principis’ and the ‘De Mixtione Elementorum’ (South Bend IN: University of Notre Dame Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, E. J. (2011) ‘Omniprescience and tough choices’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 3, 471–488.Google Scholar
Collier, Kenneth W. (1973) ‘Contra the causal theory of knowing’, Philosophical Studies, 24, 350–352.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Henry (2002) The Sources of Catholic Dogma (Fitzwilliam NH: Loreto Publications).Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald (1934) God, his Existence and his Nature: A Thomistic Solution of Certain Agnostic Antinomies (St Louis MO: B. Herder Book Company).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1967) ‘A causal theory of knowing’, The Journal of Philosophy, 64, 357–372.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael (2000) ‘Personal unity and the problem of christ's knowledge’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 74, 175–186.Google Scholar
Hunt, David (1992) ‘Omniprescient agency’, Religious Studies, 28, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, David (1996) ‘The compatibility of omniscience and intentional action: a reply to Tomis Kapitan’, Religious Studies, 32, 49–60.Google Scholar
Kapitan, Tomis (1991) ‘Agency and omniscience’, Religious Studies, 27, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapitan, Tomis (1994) ‘The incompatibility of omniscience and intentional action: a reply to David P. Hunt’, Religious Studies, 30, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapitan, Tomis (1997) ‘Acting and the open future: a brief rejoinder to David Hunt’, Religious Studies, 33, 287–292.Google Scholar
Murray, John Clifford (1963) The Infused Knowledge of Christ in the Theology of the 12th and 13th Centuries (Windsor, Ontario).Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2007) ‘Prophecy without middle knowledge’, Faith and Philosophy, 24, 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2009) ‘Prophecy’, Prosblogion. http://prosblogion.ektopos.com/archives/2009/08/prophecy.html.Google Scholar
Rota, Michael (2010) ‘The eternity solution to the problem of human freedom and divine foreknowledge’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2, 165–186.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2005) Aquinas (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P. (1990) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils: 2 Volume Set (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press).Google Scholar
‘The Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord – Book of Concord.’ Accessed February 7, 2013. http://bookofconcord.org/sd-person.php#para74.Google Scholar