Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:51:13.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If anyone is in Christ – new creation!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2018

BEN PAGE
BEN PAGE*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Durham University, 51 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HJ, UK
*
e-mail: benjamin.t.page@durham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the metaphysical transformation that occurs when a believer becomes a new creation, something which hasn't yet been explored in the literature. I start by setting out what this ontological transformation involves, and then provide two models as to how it might go. The first is a type of substratism, based on a theory of mixing, while the second thinks about this transformation in terms of replacementism. Throughout the article I seek to resolve difficulties that both of these models bring, while also showing how other aspects of Christian thought can be explained by these models.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 525 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. M. (2013) ‘Genuine agency, somehow shared? The Holy Spirit and other gifts’, Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 1, 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. M. (2016) ‘The indwelling of the Holy Spirit: some alternative models’, in Weigel, P. J., & Prud'homme, J. G. (eds) The Philosophy of Human Nature in Christian Perspective (New York: Peter Lang), 83–99.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1988) ‘The indwelling of the Holy Spirit’, in Morris, T. M. (ed.) Philosophy and the Christian Faith (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 121–150.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1984) (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bauckham, R. (2015) The Bible in the Contemporary World (Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Bobik, J. (1998) Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bultmann, R. (1951). Theology of the New Testament, I, Grobel, K. (tr.) (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons).Google Scholar
Ehring, D. (2011) Tropes (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Eichrodt, W. (1970) Ezekiel: A Commentary (Philadelphia PA: The Westminster Press).Google Scholar
Erickson, M. J. (1998) Christian Theology, 2nd edn (Grand Rapids MI: Baker Academic).Google Scholar
Flint, T. P. (2016) ‘Orthodoxy and incarnation: a reply to Mullins’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 4, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, P. (2000) ‘The Incarnation: a philosophical case for kenosis’, Religious Studies, 36, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grudem, W. (1994) Systematic Theology (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press).Google Scholar
Hays, R. B. (2000) ‘The Letter to the Galatians’, in Keck, L. E. (ed.) The New Interpreter's Bible XI (Nashville TN: Abingdon), 181–348.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2018) ‘“His death belongs to them”: an Edwardsean participatory model of atonement’, Religious Studies, 54, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. V. (2002) New Creation in Paul's Letters and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, H. (2001) A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. (1989) On a Complex Theory of a Simple God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Koons, R. C. & Pickavance, T. (2017) The Atlas of Reality (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1980) Naming and Necessity (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. L. (2011) ‘Multiple incarnations and distributed persons’, in Marmodoro, A. & Hill, J. (eds) The Metaphysics of the Incarnation (New York: Oxford University Press), 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, D. & Wasserman, R. (2007) ‘A gradable approach to dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2014) Aristotle on Perceiving Objects (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2017) Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras's Metaphysics (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (forthcoming a) ‘Hylomorphic Unity’, in Bliss, R. & Miller, J. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (forthcoming b) ‘Plotinus on perception: the mental, the physical and the in-between’, in Glenney, B & Silva, J. F. (eds) Perception and the History of Philosophy (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Martin, L. (2017) ‘Williams, Aquinas, and uncreated grace’, New Blackfriars, 98, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2014) 2 Corinthians World Biblical Commentary, 2nd edn (Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan).Google Scholar
McCabe, H. (2010) The New Creation (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Nazianzen, G. (1995) ‘Letter to Cledonius the priest against Apollinarius (Ep. CI.)’, in Schaff, P. & Wace, H. (eds) Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, VII: Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen. 2nd series (Peabody MA: Hendrickson Publishers), 439–443.Google Scholar
Ott, L. (1974) Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (Rockford IL: TAN Books).Google Scholar
Paul, L. A. (2014) Transformative Experience (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P. L. (1983) ‘Divine conservation, continuous creation, and Human action’, in Fredosso, A. J. (ed.) The Existence and Nature of God (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 55–79.Google Scholar
Rahner, K. (1978) Foundations of Christian Faith (London: Darton Longman & Todd).Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (2009) ‘Mixing the Elements’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.) A Companion to Aristotle (Oxford: Blackwell), 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. (1970) ‘Persons and their parts’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 269–285.Google Scholar
Sider, T. (2001) Four Dimensionalism (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E. (2013) ‘Omnipresence, indwelling, and the second-personal’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1994) The Christian God (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. (forthcoming) ‘The social theory of the Trinity’, Religious Studies.Google Scholar
Toner, P. (2011) ‘Transubstantiation, essentialism, and substance’, Religious Studies, 4, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallicella, W. F. (2002) ‘The creation-conservation dilemma and presentist four-dimensionalism’, Religious Studies, 38, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, [N.] T. (2007) Surprised by Hope (London: SPCK).Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. (2011). ‘Mind, spirit, soul and body: all for one and one for all reflections on Paul's anthropology in his complex contexts’. Presented at the Society of Christian Philosophers Regional Meeting, Fordham University, <http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/mind-spirit-soul-and-body/>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wright,+N.+T.+(2011).+‘Mind,+spirit,+soul+and+body:+all+for+one+and+one+for+all+reflections+on+Paul's+anthropology+in+his+complex+contexts’.+Presented+at+the+Society+of+Christian+Philosophers+Regional+Meeting,+Fordham+University,+.>Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. (2013) Paul and the Faithfulness of God (London: SPCK).Google Scholar
Yeo, R. S. (2014) ‘Towards a model of indwelling’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 2, 210–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. (1999) ‘The compatibility of materialism and survival: the “falling elevator” model’, Faith and Philosophy, 16:194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. (2010) ‘Bodily resurrection: the falling elevator model revisited’, in Gasser, G. (ed.) Personal Identity and Resurrection (Farnham: Ashgate), 33–50.Google Scholar