Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:15:48.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Mystical Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Christine Overall
Christine Overall
Affiliation:
Professor of Philosophy, Marianopolis College, Montreal, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the philosophy of mysticism, an important and foundational problem concerns the nature of mystical experience. The problem is both significant and basic because an understanding of the nature of mystical experience is a necessary precondition for the evaluation of its epistemological, ontological, and ethical significance, and will in fact influence that evaluation. In other words, our ideas about the nature of mystical experience are premises for our conclusions about the role of mystical experience in human knowledge, about the ‘object (s)’, if any, of mystical experience, and about the value and moral implications of mystical experience.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 47 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

page 47 note 1 In Mysticism and Philosophy (London: Macmillan, 1961)Google Scholar; The Teachings of the Mystics (New York: New American Library, 1960)Google Scholar; and ‘The Philosophy of Mysticism’, in Stace's Man Against Darkness (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

page 47 note 2 For example, by Katz, Steven T., ‘Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism’, in Katz, Steven T., ed., Mysticism and Philosopical Analysis (London: Sheldon Press, 1978).Google Scholar

page 48 note 1 ‘Sensation’, Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing, ed. Swartz, Robert J. (Garden City, New York: Doubleday [Anchor Books], 1965), pp. 201–2, Ryle's emphasis.Google Scholar

page 48 note 2 ‘Unconscious Inference and Judgment in Perception’, unpublished paper delivered at ‘Images, Perception, and Knowledge’ Conference (London, Ontario;May, 1974), p. 14.Google Scholar

page 48 note 3 Ibid. p. 9. See also Galen K. Pletcher, ‘Agreement Among Mystics’, Sophia 1I (1972), p. 13.

page 49 note 1 Broad, C. D., Religion, Philosophy and Psychical Research (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1953), p. 194.Google Scholar

page 49 note 2 Ibid. p. 196.

page 49 note 3 Beyond Mysticism (Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1978), p. 37.Google Scholar

page 49 note 4 ‘The Mystical Experience: With an Emphasis on Wittgenstein and Zen’, Religious Studies 12 (1976), p. 484.Google Scholar

page 50 note 1 The Self in Transformation (New York: Basic Books, 1963), pp. 294–341.Google Scholar

page 50 note 2 Leach, Penelope, Babyhood (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1975), p. 134.Google Scholar

page 51 note 1 Horne, , p. 25.Google Scholar See also Moore, Peter, ‘Mystical Experience, Mystical Doctrine, Mystical Technique’, Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, p. 114Google Scholar; and Penelhum, Terence, ‘Unity and Diversity in the Interpretation of Mysticism’, Mystics and Scholars: The Calgary Conference on Mysticism 1976, ed. Harold Coward and Terence Penelhum (Waterloo, Ontario:Wilfrid Laurier University Press,1977), p. 71.Google Scholar

page 51 note 2 Herrigel, Eugen, Zen in the Art of Archery, trans. Hull, R. F. C., introduction by D.T. Suzuki (New York: Random House [Viking Books], 1971), p. 10.Google Scholar

page 51 note 3 Overall, A. K., Philips Electronics Ltd., personal communication.Google Scholar

page 51 note 4 See Kapleau, Philip, The Three Pillars of Zen: Teaching, Practice, and Enlightenment, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1965).Google Scholar

page 52 note 1 ‘Mystical Experience, Mystical Doctrine, Mystical Technique’, p. 120.Google Scholar See also Moore's, ‘Recent Studies of Mysticism: A Critical Survey’, Religion 3 (1973), pp. 153–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 52 note 2 Fingarette, , p. 327, Fingarette's emphasis.Google Scholar

page 52 note 3 Broad, , p. 190.Google Scholar

page 52 note 4 ‘Naturalism and Religion’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 23 (1949–1950), p. 24.Google Scholar See also Stace's, Religion and the Modern Mind (London: Macmillan, 1953), p. 239 and pp. 256–7.Google Scholar

page 53 note 1 ‘Intuition and the Inexpressible’, Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, p. 212.Google Scholar

page 53 note 2 Owen, H. P., ‘Christian Mysticism: A Study in Walter Hilton's The Ladder of Perfection’, Religious Studies 7 (1971), p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar