No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
In The Retreat to Commitment (London, 1964), Professor W. W. Bartley III argues for a certain theory of rationality and contends that by this criterion it is not possible for a christian theist to be rational. His theory of rationality has already aroused considerable criticism, but his application of it to religious belief in particular, has not hitherto been widely considered.
page 339 note 1 Op. cit. p. 146.
page 341 note 1 E.g. Watkins, J. W. N., ‘Comprehensively Critical Rationalism’, Philosophy XLIV, 1969.Google Scholar
page 341 note 2 E.g. Agassi, J., Jarvie, I. C., Settle, Tom, ‘The Grounds of Reason’, Philosophy XLVI, 1971.Google Scholar
page 342 note 1 Op. cit. p. 149.
page 342 note 2 Op. cit. p. 170.
page 342 note 3 Op. cit. p. 171.
page 342 note 4 Op. cit. p. 172.
page 343 note 1 Op. cit. p. 149.
page 345 note 1 Op. cit. p. 150.
page 345 note 2 ibid.
page 346 note 1 How to do Things with Words (Oxford, 1962), pp. 156–8Google Scholar
page 348 note 1 Op. cit. p. 71.
page 348 note 2 Op. cit. pp. 58–9.
page 349 note 1 Op. cit. pp. 61–2.
page 349 note 2 Cf. Nielsen, K., ‘Wittgensteinian Fideism’, Philosophy XLII, 1967Google Scholar; my ‘On Two Points against Wittgensteinian Fideism’, Philosophy XLIII, 1968Google Scholar; and Nielsen's, , ‘Wittgensteinian Fideism: A Reply to Hudson’, Philosophy XLIV, 1969.Google Scholar