No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
The religiously inclined have always rejected materialism. The thesis of this study is that there may have been good reasons for them to do so until comparatively recent times but that the same reasons no longer exist. Our knowledge of matter has not only increased, it has also been altered so completely that there is no more justification for disapproving of materialism on religious grounds.
page 211 note 1 Wolfson, Harry A., Philo., 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1956)Google Scholar, passim.
page 214 note 1 Yang, Chen Ning, Elementary Particles (Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar Table 4.
page 214 note 2 Bahcall, John N., ‘Observational Neutrino Astronomy’ in Science, 147, 115 (1965).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
page 214 note 3 Christopher Hall in the New Scientist (no. 409), 17 09 1964, p. 715.Google Scholar
page 215 note 1 von Hippel, Arthur R., ‘Molecular Designing of Materials’ in Science, 138, 93 (1965).Google Scholar
page 215 note 2 Ibid. p. 95.
page 216 note 1 Bohm, David, Quantum Theory (Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall, 1951), pp. 144 ff.Google Scholar
page 218 note 1 Rescher, Nicholas, Hypothetical Reasoning (Amsterdam. North-Holland Publishing Co., 1964), p. 47.Google Scholar
page 222 note 1 Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charles, Hartshorne and Paul, Weiss (ed.) (Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1931–1935), 6.493, 6.458, 6.613.Google Scholar
page 223 note 1 Feibleman, James K., The Pious Scientist (New York. Bookman Associates, 1958).Google Scholar