Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:47:57.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Levine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1998

NICHOLAS WOLTERSTORFF
NICHOLAS WOLTERSTORFF
Affiliation:
The Divinity School, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that, though Levine frequently states that Divine Discourse is full of fundamental errors, he does little by way of proving his point. In particular, I defend the claim in Divine Discourse that divine speech is not a species of revelation. I rebut Levine's account of the significance of Biblical scholarship, defend my interpretation of Ricoeur and my remarks on entitlement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 17 - 23
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)