Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:57:11.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Wunder: objective probability, non-contingent theism, and the EAAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2018

PERRY HENDRICKS
PERRY HENDRICKS*
Affiliation:
Trinity Western University, Langley, British ColumbiaV2Y 1Y1, Canada
*
e-mail: ampchendricks@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a response to Tyler Wunder's ‘The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy’ (this journal). In his article, Wunder argues that if the proponent of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN) holds theism to be non-contingent and frames the argument in terms of objective probability, then the EAAN is either unsound or theism is necessarily false. I argue that a modest revision of the EAAN renders Wunder's objection irrelevant, and that this revision actually widens the scope of the argument.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 292 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beilby, James (ed.) (2002) Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Bosse, Richard (2017) ‘Wunder's probability objections’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11153-017-9634-1>.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1993) Warrant and Proper Function (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2011a) ‘Content and natural selection’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83, 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2011b) Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin & Tooley, Michael (2008) Knowledge of God (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, Tyler (2013) ‘Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper's evolutionary atheology: implications of theism's noncontingency’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, Tyler (2015) ‘The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy’, Religious Studies, 51, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar