Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:15:37.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theism and infallibilism: can the marriage be saved? Response to Blaauw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2007

ROBERT OAKES
ROBERT OAKES
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Saint Louis University, 3800 Lindell Blvd, PO Box 56907, St Louis, MO 63156-0907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay constitutes a brief response to Martin Blaauw's paper, ‘Divorcing theism from infallibilism’, Religious Studies, 43 (2007), 349–354, in which he raises a number of thought-provoking objections to an earlier paper of mine which appeared in this journal: ‘Theism and infallibilism: a marriage made in heaven?’, Religious Studies, 40 (2004), 193–201. In the following counter-response, I hope to show that the argument developed in my original essay manages to survive his objections. (All page references in the text are to Martin Blaauw's paper above.)

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 355 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)