No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
At the beginning of his book, Principles of Christian Theology, John Macquarrie says that theology ‘implicitly claims to have its place in the total intellectual endeavour of mankind’. The question I want to discuss is this: in what terms, if any, can that claim be justified?
page 21 note 1 London (1966).
page 22 note 1 London, pp. 279–80.
page 22 note 2 De Carni Christi, v.
page 23 note 1 There is a useful collection of Aquinas' texts on analogy at the end of Palmer's, H.Analogy (London, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar see also Ferré, F., Logic, Language and God (London, 1962), chap. VI.Google Scholar
page 24 note 1 The Existence of God, pp. 52, 279.Google Scholar
page 27 note 1 Bonhoeffer, D., Letters and Papers from Prison.Google Scholar
page 29 note 1 See my A Philosophical Approach to Religion (London, 1974), pp. 14–16.
page 29 note 2 Cf further on this in my ‘What makes religous beliefs religious?’, Religious Studies XIII (1977).
page 30 note 1 ‘Empiricism, semantics and ontology’, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie (Bruxelles, 1950).
page 30 note 2 On Certainty, 315.
page 31 note 1 Op. cit. 103.
page 31 note 2 Op. cit. 310–17.
page 31 note 3 Op. cit. 23.
page 32 note 1 See The Concept of Mind (London, 1949) and Dilemmas, (Cambridge, 1960).
page 32 note 2 Principia Ethica (Cambridge, 1903), chapter 1.
page 32 note 3 See his ‘A defence of common sense’ (1925) in Moore, G. E., Philosophical Papers (London, 1959).Google Scholar
page 33 note 1 ‘Metaphysics and common sense’ in his collection of papers with the same title (London, 1969), p. 72.
page 33 note 2 The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959), p. 280.
page 33 note 3 Cf. On Certainty, 145.
page 33 note 4 See his I and Thou (Berlin, 1933; Edinburgh, 1970).
page 35 note 1 Op. cit. 559.
page 36 note 1 Op. cit. 102.
page 36 note 2 Op. cit. 97.
page 36 note 3 Op. cit. 410.