Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T18:55:10.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germain Marc'hadour. L'Univers de Thomas More, Chronologie critique de More, Erasme, et leur époque (1477–1536). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1963. 588 pp. 60 NF.

Review products

Germain Marc'hadour. L'Univers de Thomas More, Chronologie critique de More, Erasme, et leur époque (1477–1536). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1963. 588 pp. 60 NF.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

R. S. Sylvester
R. S. Sylvester*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Renaissance News , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , Winter 1963 , pp. 319 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 At times one notes a certain inconsistency of method in this section. Thus on p. 323, the death of Antonio de Nebrija and Zwingli's allusion to himself as ‘evêique de Zürich’ (both in July 1522) surely belong to the ‘theatrum mundi’ and not to the More and Erasmus columns.

2 See Kingdon, J. A., Richard Grafton Citizen and Grocer of London (privately printed by Rixon and Arnold, Poultry, London, 1901), appendix, p. xxi.Google Scholar

3 See Vives, J. L., Opera, 2 vols. (Basel, 1555), 1, 252f.Google Scholar

4 Index of Dedications and Commendatory Verses in English Books Before 1641 (London, Bibliographical Society, 1962), p. xiii. Equally relevant is the judgment of Kristeller, Paul O. (Studies in the Renaissance, 9 [1962], 22)Google Scholar: ‘What we need at this stage of our studies is not additional opinions, but rather bibliographies, editions, monographs, and really comprehensive works of reference.’ [Editor's note: see the announcement of M. A. Shaaber's Check-List, p. 370, this issue.]