Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:36:17.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art and Humanism in Early Renaissance Padua: Cennini, Vergerio and Petrarch on Imitation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Andrea Bolland*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Extract

A number of passages in Cennino Cennini's early fifteenth-century craft handbook, the Libro dell'Arte, have captured the attentionof art historians — most particularly its spectacular first chapter, which defines painting in terms indebted to late medieval poetics and which praises artistic imagination in terms ultimately derived (though significantly transformed) from Horace's Ars poetica. I would like to focus critical attention on another section of the Libro that is equally rich and complex in both its sources and its transformations — Cennini's treatment of imitation and style, articulated most pointedly in chapter 27, “How to Strive to Copy and Draw from as Few Mastersas Possible.” Cennini's discussion of copying masters will be examined in relation to humanist ideas on literary imitation, and this particular aspect of the relation between painting and poetry in theLibrowill be explored in light of the author's residency in Padua during the last years of the Trecento.

Type
Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Michael J.B. Allen and the reviewers of this article for their helpful suggestions. Additionally, I would like to thank Mary Pardo for her many insightful comments on the text.

References

Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting and On Sculpture. Ed. and trans. Grayson, Cecil. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Ames-Lewis, Francis. Drawing in Early Renaissance Italy. New Haven, 1981.Google Scholar
Ames-Lewis, Francis, and Wright, Joanne. Drawing in the Italian Renaissance Workshop. London, 1983.Google Scholar
Capellanus, Andreas. Andreas Capellanus on Love. Ed. and trans. Walsh, P.G.. London, 1982.Google Scholar
Aurigemma, Marcello. “Il ‘Sermo de vita Francisci Petrarchae’ di Pier Paolo Vergerio.” In Studi filologici letterari e storici in memoria di Guido Favati, ed. Varanini, Giorgio and Pinagli, Palmiro, 1:3353. Padua, 1977.Google Scholar
Bacci, M., and Stoppelli, P.. “Cennini, Cennino.” In Dizionario biografico degli italiani, 23:565-69. Rome, 1979.Google Scholar
Baggio, Serenella. “L'immagine di Laura.Giomale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 156 (1979): 321-34.Google Scholar
Battaglia, Salvatore. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin, 1961.Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. Giotto and the Orators. Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar
Bernardo, Aldo. Petrarch, Scipio and the “Africa”: The Birth of Humanism's Dream. Baltimore, 1962.Google Scholar
Silvestris, Bernardus. Commentum super sex libros Eneidos Virgilii. Ed. Jones, J.W. and Jones, E.F.. Lincoln, NE, 1977.Google Scholar
Bettini, Sergio. Giusto de Menabuoi e l'arte del Trecento. Padua, 1944.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. Petrarca e Padova. Padua, 1976.Google Scholar
Billanovich, Giuseppe. Petrarca Letterato I: Lo scrittoio del Petrarca. Rome, 1947.Google Scholar
“Buzzacarini, Ludovico.” In Dizionario biografico degli Italiani, 15: 643-46. Rome, 1972.Google Scholar
Castellano, Angela. “Storia di una parola letteraria: It. ‘vago.’Archivio glottologico italiano 48 (1963): 126-69.Google Scholar
Cennini, Cennino. Il libro dell'arte. Ed. Brunello, Francesco. 2d ed. Vicenza, 1982.Google Scholar
Chastel, André. “ Le dictum Horatii quidlibet audendi potestas et les artists .” In Fables, formes, figures, 1:363-76. Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Fourna. The “Painter's Manual.” Ed. and trans. Hetherington, Paul. London, 1974.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven, 1982.Google Scholar
Harvey, E. Ruth. The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Kemp, Martin. “From ‘Mimesis’ to ‘Fantasia’: The Quattrocento Vocabulary of Creative Inspiration.Viator 8 (1977): 347-98.Google Scholar
Kohl, Benjamin. “Political Attitudes of North Italian Humanists in the Late Trecento.Studies in Medieval Culture 4 (1974): 418-27.Google Scholar
Medin, Antonio. “Il culto del Petrarca nel Veneto fino alla dittatura del Bembo.” Nuovo Archivio Veneto n.s. 8 (1904): 421-65.Google Scholar
Mellini, Gian Lorenzo. “Considerazioni su probabili rapporti tra Altichiero e Petrarca.” In Da Giotto al Mantegna, ed. Grosssato, L., 5154. Milan, 1974.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor E. Petrarch's Testament. Ithaca, 1957.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles G. Boccaccio on Poetry. New York, 1956.Google Scholar
Padua sidus preclarum: I Dondi dall'Orologio e la Padova dei Carraresi. Padua, 1989.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia A.Gasparino Barzizza's Commentaries on Seneca's Letters.” Traditio 33 (1977): 297358.10.1017/S0362152900009132Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art. New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Pardo, Mary. “The Subject of Savoldo's Magdalene.’Art Bulletin 71 (1989): 6791.10.1080/00043079.1989.10788479Google Scholar
Pardo, Mary. “Memory, Imagination, Figuration: Leonardo da Vinci and the Painter's Mind.” In Images of Memory: On Remembering and Representation, ed. Küchler, Susanne and Melion, Walter, 4773, 212-24. Washington, 1991.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis. Le familiari. Vol. 4. Ed. Bosco, Umberto. Florence, 1942.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francis. Letters on Familiar Matters: Rerum familiarium libri XVII-XXV. Trans. Bernardo, Aldo S.. Baltimore, 1985.Google Scholar
Pigman, G.W. III. “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance.Renaissance Quarterly 33 (1980): 132.10.2307/2861533Google Scholar
Plant, Margaret. “Patronage in the Circle of the Carrara Family: Padua, 1337-1405.” In Patronage, Art and Society in Renaissance Italy, ed. Kent, F.W. and Simons, Patricia, 177-99. Canberra and Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium. Ed. and trans. Caplan, H.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA, 1981.Google Scholar
Robey, David. “P.P. Vergerio the Elder: Republicanism and Civic Values in the Work of an Early Humanist.Past and Present 58 (1973): 337.Google Scholar
Sacchetti, Franco. Il Trecentonovelle. Ed. Lanza, Antonio. Florence, 1984.Google Scholar
Schlosser-Magnino, Julius. La letteratura artistica. Trans. Rossi, F.. Florence, 1964.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Epistulae morales. 3 vols. Ed. and trans. Gummere, Richard M.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA, 1989-91.Google Scholar
Skaug, Erling. “Cenniniana: Notes on Cennino Cennini and his Treatise.Arte Cristiana 81 (1993): 1522.Google Scholar
Spiazzi, Anna Maria, ed. Giusto de’ Menabuoi nel battistero di Padova. Trieste, 1989.Google Scholar
Summers, David. Michelangelo and the Language of Art. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
Summers, David. The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics. Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
Summers, David. “ Aria Il: The Union of Image and Artist as an Aesthetic Ideal in Renaissance Art.” Artibus et historiae 10(1989): 1531.10.2307/1483351Google Scholar
Vasari, Giorgio. Le vite de’ più eccellenti pittori, scultore ed architettori. Ed. Milanesi, Gaetano. 8 vols. Florence, 1906.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare. “Intelletto.” In Enciclopedia Dantesca, ed. Bosco, Umberto, 4: 464-68. Rome, 1971.Google Scholar
Vergerio, P.P. Epistolario di P.P. Vergerio. Ed. Smith, Leonardo. Rome, 1934.Google Scholar
Wilkins, E.H. Petrarch's Later Years. Cambridge, MA, 1959.Google Scholar
William of Conches. Dialogus de substantiis physicis [1567]. Rpt., Frankfurt/Main, 1967.Google Scholar