Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:21:26.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Florio's Montaigne and the Tyranny of “Custome”: Appropriation, Ideology, and Early English Readership of the Essayes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

William M. Hamlin
William M. Hamlin*
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early English readers of Michel de Montaigne (1533–92) annotated their copies of John Florio's (1553[?]–1625) translation with remarkable frequency and vehemence, creating a context within which printed appropriations of the essayist may be fruitfully examined. No topic intrigued these readers more than custom. Drawing from transcriptions of over 4,000 marginal annotations and situating the Montaignean borrowings of William Shakespeare (1564–1616), Sir Francis Bacon (1561–1626), and other English writers within a culture of active reader response, this essay treats the Montaignean account of custom as a case study wherein differences between manuscript and print appropriation may be investigated. Montaigne's reception in seventeenth-century England cannot be understood without scrupulous attention to both traditions.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , Summer 2010 , pp. 491 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Renaissance Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to express my gratitude to the J. S. Guggenheim Foundation, which has generously supported my research on the English reception of Montaigne. I presented a preliminary version of this paper at the convention of the Modern Language Association of America on 30 December 2007. Trevor Bond, Rob Carson, Robert Ellrodt, Beatrice Henrioulle, Theresa Jordan, Andrew McCarthy, and Augusta Rohrbach have aided me tremendously in thinking about early readership of Florio's translation. Finally, I am much indebted to Warren Boutcher and to Anne Lake Prescott, each of whom offered invaluable, exacting, and wonderfully learned commentaries on this essay.

References

Andersen, Jennifer, and Sauer, Elizabeth, eds. Books and Readers inEarly Modern England. Philadelphia, 2002.Google Scholar
Anderson, Fulton. The Philosophy of FrancisBacon. Chicago, 1948.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Works of Francis Bacon. Ed. , Spedding, James et al. 14 vols. Stuttgart, 1963.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. Francis Bacon: A CriticalEdition of the Major Works. Ed. , Vickers, Brian. Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
Barclay, John. Argenis. Trans. , Long, Kingesmill. London, 1625.Google Scholar
Boase, Alan M. The Fortunes of Montaigne:A History of the Essays in France, 1580–1669. London, 1935.Google Scholar
Boemus, Joannes. The Manners, Lawes and Customesof all Nations. Trans. , Aston, E. London, 1611.Google Scholar
Bourland, Caroline. “Gabriel Harvey and theModern Languages.” HuntingtonLibrary Quarterly 4(1940–41): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutcher, Warren. “Humanism and Literaturein Late Tudor England: Translation, the Continental Book and the Caseof Montaigne's Essais.” In Reassessing Tudor Humanism, ed. , Woolfson, Jonathan, 243–68. London, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutcher, Warren. “Marginal Commentaries:The Cultural Transmission of Montaigne's Essais inShakespeare's England.” In Shakespeare et Montaigne (2003), 13–27.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Warren. “Montaigne's Legacy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Montaigne (2005), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Ed. , Thomas Faulkner, C., Nicolas Kiessling, K. and Blair, Rhonda L. 3 vols. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
The Cambridge Companionto Montaigne. Ed. Ullrich Langer. Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar
Carey, Daniel. Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson:Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond. Cambridge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaubon, Meric. A Treatise of Use and Custome. London, 1638.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Guglielmo, and Chartier, Roger, eds. A History of Readingin the West. Boston, 1999.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre. Of Wisdome. Trans. , Lennard, Samson. London, 1608.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, Sir William. Essayes. Ed. , Cameron Allen, Don. Baltimore, 1946.Google Scholar
Cotgrave, Randle. A Dictionarie of the Frenchand English Tongues. London, 1611.Google Scholar
Cumber, John. The Two Merry Milkmaids. London, 1620.Google Scholar
Daniel, Samuel. The Queenes Arcadia. A pastoralltrage-comedie. London, 1606.Google Scholar
Davies, Sir John. Poems. Ed. , Krueger, Robert. Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
Dent, R. W. John Webster's Borrowing. Berkeley, 1960.Google Scholar
Dent, R. W. Shakespeare's Proverbial Language. Berkeley, 1981.Google Scholar
Dent, R. W. Proverbial Language in EnglishDrama Exclusive of Shakespeare, 1495–1616. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Digby, Sir Kenelm. Loose Fantasies. Ed. , Gabrieli, Vittorio. Rome, 1968.Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion,Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Durham, NC, 1993.Google Scholar
Donne, John. The Complete English Poems. Ed. , Smith, A. J. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Ellrodt, Robert. “Self-Consciousness inMontaigne and Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Survey 28 (1975): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellrodt, Robert. “Constance des valeurshumanistes chez Montaigne et chez Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare et Montaigne (2003), 95–116.Google Scholar
Ellrodt, Robert. “Self-Consistency inMontaigne and Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare and the Mediterranean, ed. , Clayton, Tom et al., 135–55. Newark, DE, 2004.Google Scholar
Engle, Lars. “Sovereign Cruelty inMontaigne and King Lear.” Shakespearean International Yearbook 6 (2006): 119–39.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Proverbes or Adagies. Trans. , Taverner, Richard. London, 1539.Google Scholar
Estienne, Henri. Les premices, ou Le I livredes Proverbes epigrammatizez. Geneva, 1594.Google Scholar
Feltham, Owen. Resolves: Divine, Morall,Politicall. London, 1620.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare, Machiavelli,and Montaigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet. Oxford, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christopher. “Theatrum Libri: Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy and the Failure of Encyclopedic Form.” In Books and Readers in Early Modern England, ed. , Andersen, Jennifer and Sauer, Elizabeth, 80–96. Philadelphia, 2002.Google Scholar
Hackel, Heidi Brayman. Reading Material in EarlyModern England. Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar
Hamlin, William M. Tragedy and Scepticism inShakespeare's England. NewYork, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, William M. “Montagnes MoralMaxims: Seventeenth-Century English Aphorisms Derived fromthe Essays of Montaigne.” Montaigne Studies 21 (2009): 209–24.Google Scholar
Herbert, George. George Herbert. Ed. , Martz, Louis. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Hoffman, George. “Anatomy of the Mass:Montaigne's ‘Cannibals.’” Publications of the Modern Language Association 117.2 (2002): 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, George. “Montaigne, Lear, andthe Question of Afterlife.” In Shakespeare et Montaigne (2003), 157–73.Google Scholar
Hovey, Kenneth. “‘Mountaigny Saith Prettily’: Bacon's French and the Essay.” Publications of the Modern Language Association 106.1 (1991): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huguet, Edmond. Dictionnaire de la LangueFrançaise du Seizième Siècle. 7 vols. Paris, 1925–67.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. J. Marginalia: Readers Writingin Books. New Haven, 2001.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Three Comedies. Ed. , Jamieson, Michael. Harmondsworth, UK, 1966.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Arthur C. “Virtue, Vice, and Compassionin Montaigne and The Tempest.” Studies in English Literature 37.2 (1997): 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Boétie, Étienne de. Le discours de la servitudevolontaire. Ed. , Léonard, Pierre. Paris, 2002.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. “Montaigne's Customs.” Montaigne Studies 4 (1992): 81–96.Google Scholar
Lee, John. “The English RenaissanceEssay: Churchyard, Cornwallis, Florio's Montaigne and Bacon.” In A Companion to English Renaissance Literatureand Culture, ed. , Hattaway, M. 600–08. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar
Maguin, Jean-Marie. “The Tempest and Cultural Exchange.” Shakespeare Survey 48 (1995): 147–54.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence. Convention, 1500–1750. Cambridge, MA, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, John. The Dutch Courtesan. Ed. , Wine, M. L. Lincoln, NE, 1965.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas. The Collected Works. Ed. , Taylor, Gary et al. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Ed. , Shields, Currin V. Indianapolis, 1956.Google Scholar
Millet, Olivier. La première réceptiondes Essais de Montaigne (1580–1640). Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. , Hughes, M. Y. Indianapolis, 1957.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Discorsi morali, politiciet militari. Trans. , Naselli, G. Ferrara, 1590.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Les Essais. Ed. , Villey, Pierre. Paris, 1930–31.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1603. The Essayes, or Morall,Politike and Millitarie Discourses of Lord Michaell de Montaigne. Trans. , Florio, John. Menston, UK, 1969.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Les Essais. Ed. , Villey, Pierre. , Saulnier, Rev V.-L. 3 vols. Paris, 1992a.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Journal de voyage. Ed., Rigolot, François. Paris, 1992b.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. Les Essais. Ed. , Balsamo, Jean, Magnien, Michel, and Magnien-Simonin, Catherine. Paris, 2007.Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. The Sources of Shakespeare'sPlays. London, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Robin, et al., eds. Owners, Annotatorsand the Signs of Reading. London, 2005.Google Scholar
Nicot, Jean. Thresor de la Langue Francoise,tant Ancienne que Moderne. Paris, 1621.Google Scholar
Parker, Fred. “Shakespeare's Argumentwith Montaigne.” CriticalQuarterly 28.1 (1999): 1–18.Google Scholar
Paster, Gail Kern. “Montaigne, Dido, and The Tempest: ‘How came that widow in?’” Shakespeare Quarterly 35.1 (1984): 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, Eleanor. “Shakespeare, Montaigne,and the Rarer Action.” Shakespeare Studies 1 (1965): 261–64.Google Scholar
Quint, David. Montaigne and the Qualityof Mercy: Ethical and Political Themes in the Essais. Princeton, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. “Montaigne and the Subjectof Polity.” In LiteraryTheory / Renaissance Texts, ed. , Parker, Patricia and Quint, David, 115–49. Baltimore, 1986.Google Scholar
Sainte-Palaye, Jean-Baptiste de La Curne de. Dictionnaire Historique del'Ancien Langage François. 10 vols. Paris, 1875–82.Google Scholar
Salingar, Leo. Dramatic Form in Shakespeareand the Jacobeans. Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Sayce, Richard A. The Essays of Montaigne: ACritical Exploration. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Three-Text Hamlet: ParallelTexts of the First and Second Quartos and First Folio. Ed. , Kliman, Bernice W.and Bertram, Paul. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. , Greenblatt, Stephen et al. New York, 2008.Google Scholar
Shakespeare et Montaigne:vers un nouvel humanisme. Ed. Pierre Kapitaniak and Jean-MarieMaguin. Paris, 2003.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin, and Zwicker, Steven N. Reading, Society and Politicsin Early Modern England. Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, William. Used Books: Marking Readersin Renaissance England. Philadelphia, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Makingof the Modern Identity. Cambridge,MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Tilley, Morris Palmer. Dictionary of the Proverbsin England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Ann Arbor, 1950.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. On Human Diversity: Nationalism,Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought. Trans. , Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar
Tournon, André. Montaigne: La glose et l'essai. Lyon, 1983.Google Scholar
Tournon, André. “Justice and the Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Montaigne (2005), 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournon, André. “Coutume.” In the Dictionnaire de Michel de Montaigne, ed. , Desan, Philippe, 266–69. Paris, 2007.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. Montaigne et FrançoisBacon. Paris, 1913.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. “Montaigne et les poètesdramatiques anglais du temps de Shakespeare.” Revue d'histoire littéraire de laFrance 24 (1917): 357–93.Google Scholar
Walwyn, William. The Writings of William Walwyn. Ed. , McMichael, Jack R.and Taft, Barbara. Athens, GA, 1989.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. John Florio: The Life of anItalian in Shakespeare's England. Cambridge, 1934.Google Scholar
Younge, Richard. The Drunkard's Character. London, 1638.Google Scholar