Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T21:49:46.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gabriel Harvey's Ciceronianus and the Place of Peter Ramus' Dialecticae libri duo in the Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

John Charles Adams
John Charles Adams*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Useful Way of Establishing the historical significance of any perceptive text in the discourse arts is to explain the connection between the values embedded in its illustrative materials and the social and political interests it may have served and advanced among the persons who used it. Illustrative materials evidence and communicate lines of thought—substance as well as formal dimensions of technical interest to students of the history of the discourse arts.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1990 , pp. 551 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John Charles. “Ramus. Illustrations, and the Puritan Movement.” The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 17(1987): 195–210.Google Scholar
Adams, John Charles. “Alexander Richardson's Philosophy of Art and the Sources of the Puritan Social Ethic. “Journal of the History ofIdeas 50 (1989): 227-47.10.2307/2709733Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. De Officiis. Trans. Miller, Walter. New York, 1921.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. De Lege Agraria Oratio. Trans. Freese, John Henry. Cambridge, MA, and London, 1930.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. Pro T. Annio Milone Oratio. Trans. Watts, N. H.. New York and London, 1931. Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. De Natura Deorum. Trans. Gilbert, Allan H.. New York, 1935.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. In Catilinam. Trans. Lord, Louis E.. Cambridge, MA, and London, 1937.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. Eleventh Philippic. Trans. Mackenzie, Donald C.. New Haven, 1962.Google Scholar
Downame, George. Commentarii in P. Rami … . London, 1669.Google Scholar
Fenner, Dudley. The Artes of logick and Rhetorike. London, 1584.Google Scholar
Fraunce, Abraham. The Lawiers Logike. London, 1588.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa. From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth- Century Europe. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
Granger, Thomas. Syntagma Logician. London, 1620.Google Scholar
Harvey, Gabriel. The Letter Book of Gabriel Harvey, A.D. 1573-1580. Ed. Scott, Edward John Long. The Camden Society, N.S. 33. Westminster, 1884.Google Scholar
Harvey, Gabriel. Ciceronianus. Trans. Forbes, Clarence A.. University of Nebraska Studies, 41. Lincoln, 1945.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Behemoth. In English Works of Thomas Hobbes. Ed. Lamprecht, Sterling P.. New York, 1949.Google Scholar
Isocrates, . Antidosis. Trans. Norlin, George. New York and London, 1929.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomew. Praccognitorum Logicorum Tractatus Tres. Geneva, 1614.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Art is Logicae Plenoir lnstitutio ad Petri Rami Methodum Concinnata … . Trans. Allan H. Gilbert, Vol. 11 of The Works of John Milton. New York, 1935.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Prose Works of John Milton. New Haven, 1962. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Ramus, Peter. Ciceronianus. Paris, 1557.Google Scholar
Ramus, Peter. Dialecticae libri duo. In John Downame, Commentarii in P. Rami…. London, 1669.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alexander. The Logicians School-Master. London, 1657.Google Scholar
Stern, Virginia F. Gabriel Harvey: His Life, Marginalia, and Library. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Don M. “Introduction.” In Complete Prose Works of John Milton, Vol. 4: 1–283. New Haven, 1962.Google Scholar
Wotton, Anthony. Art of Logick. London, 1620. Google Scholar