Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:35:58.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Papal Antichrist: Martin Luther and the Underappreciated Influence of Lorenzo Valla*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Whitford David M.
Whitford David M.*
Affiliation:
United Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1520, Martin Luther’s view of the papacy shifted dramatically and permanently. While the events of 1519 played a role in his evolving view of the papacy as the Antichrist forecast by St. Paul in 2 Thessalonians, those events alone cannot account for the suddenness and the totality of Luther’s change of opinion. This essay argues that Lorenzo Valla’s Discourse on the Forgery of the Alleged Donation of Constantine played a significant and too-little-appreciated role in Luther’s new stance toward the papacy. This essay examines what it was about Valla’s Discourse that helped convince Luther that the pope was the Antichrist.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 26 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An early version of this paper was presented in the seminar on eschatology at the 2006 North American Forum for Luther Research. I am indebted to my seminar colleagues, Greg Miller, Russell Kleckley, and Austra Reinis. I would also like to thank the two anonymous RQ reviewers, Scott Hendrix, Carter Lindberg, and Larry Welborn for their helpful comments. For the Weimar Ausgabe edition of Luther’s works (Luther, 1883–), I use the following standard abbreviations: WA for the writings in general; WADB for the Luther Bible (Deutsche Bibel); and WABr for the letters (briefe). For the St. Louis Luther’s Works (Luther, 1955–86), I use LW.

References

Backus, Irena. Historical Method and Confessional Identity in the Era of the Reformation. Leiden, 2003.Google Scholar
Barnes, Robert. Bapsttrew Hadriani iiij. vnd Alexanders iii. gegen Keyser Friderichen Barbarossa geuebt: Aus der Historia zusamen gezogen nuetzlich zu lesen / Mit einer Vorrhede D. Mar. Luthers. Wittemberg, 1545.Google Scholar
Barnes, Robin. Prophecy and Gnosis: Apocalypticism in the Wake of the Lutheran Reformation. Stanford, 1988.Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 2nd ed., Chicago, 1979.Google Scholar
Bäumer, Remigius. Martin Luther und der Papst. Munich, 1971.Google Scholar
Beno, . “Benonis aliorumque cardinalium schismaticorum contra Gregorium VII et Urbanum II.” In Libellis de lite imperatorum et pontificum, ed. Ernst Dümmler, 2:366–422. Hanover, 1892.Google Scholar
Brecht, Martin. Martin Luther: Shaping and Defining the Reformation 1521–1532. Trans. James Schaaf. Minneapolis, 1990.Google Scholar
Bugenhagen, Johannes. ANNOtationes Ioan. Bvgenhagij Pomerani in X. epistolas Pauli. Argentorati, 1524.Google Scholar
Cantor, Norman. The Civilization of the Middle Ages: A Completely Revised and Expanded Edition of Medieval History. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John. Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle to the Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Series 1. Vol. 13. Ed. Philip Schaff. Edinburgh, 1885.Google Scholar
Deutsche Reichstagsakten: Jüngere Reihe. Ed. Historische Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 4 vols. Göttingen, 1962.Google Scholar
Emmerson, Richard K. Antichrist in the Middle Ages: A Study of Medieval Apocalypticism, Art, and Literature. Seattle, 1981.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. PARAphrases Eras. Rot. In omnes epistolas Pauli. Mogvntiae, 1522.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. NOVVM INstrumentum omne. In Erasmus von Rotterdam Novum Instru-mentum, Basil 1516, Faksimile-Neudruck, ed. Heinz Holeczek. Stuttgart, 1986.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Correspondence of Erasmus: Letters 1356 to 1534 (1523–1524). Toronto, 1992.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Axiomata Erasmi Roterodami pro causa Martini Lutheri. In The Collected Works of Erasmus, ed. J. K. Sowards, 71:97–105. Toronto, 1993.Google Scholar
Fleming, Gerard. “On the Origin of the Passional Christi et Antichristi and Lucas Cranach the Elder’s Contribution to Reformation Polemics in the Iconography of the Passional.” Gutenberg Jahrbuch (1973): 351–67.Google Scholar
Grane, Leif. Martinus Noster: Luther in the German Reform Movement, 1518–1520. Mainz, 1994.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm, eds. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig, 1834.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Scott. Luther and the Papacy: Stages in a Reformation Conflict. Philadelphia, 1981.Google Scholar
Hesiod, . Theogony. In The Homeric Hymns and Homerica with an English Translation, trans. Hugh G. Evelyn-White, 78–153. Cambridge, MA, 1914.Google Scholar
Hillerbrand, Hans. The Protestant Reformation. New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Hughes, Kevin L. Constructing Antichrist: Paul, Biblical Commentary, and the Development of Doctrine in the Early Middle Ages. Washington, DC, 2005.Google Scholar
Joachim of Fiore. Expositio in Apocalypsim. Venice, 1527. Reprint, Frankfurt, 1964.Google Scholar
Kittel, Gerhard. Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament. Stuttgart, 1953.Google Scholar
Lauff, Joseph von. Regina coeli: eine Geschichte aus dem Abfall der Niederlande. Berlin, 1905.Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. Heresy in the Middle Ages. New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Carter, Lindberg. “Prierias and his Significance for Luther’s Development.” Sixteenth Century Journal 3, no. 2 (1972). 45 – 64.Google Scholar
Carter, Lindberg. “Luther’s Views on Papal Authority.” Andover Newton Quarterly 17, no. 3 (1977). 213 – 26.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. “Preface.” In John Purvey, Commentarivs in apocalypsin, A2r–A3r. Wittemberg, 1528.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. The Works of Martin Luther. Ed. Henry Jacobs and Adolph Spaeth. 6 vols. Philadelphia, 1915–32.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. Luther’s Works. Ed. Jaroslav Pelikan and Helmut T. Lehmann. 55 vols. St. Louis, 1955–86.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, and Lucas Cranach the Elder. Passional Christi unnd Antichristi. Erfurt, 1521. Available online at http://www.pitts.emory.edu/woodcuts/1521LuthWW/PassionalChristi.pdf (accessed 6 November 2007).Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. Antichrist: Two Thousand Years of the Human Fascination with Evil. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A “Teufelsdreck: Eschatology and Scatology in the ‘Old’ Luther.” Sixteenth Century Journal 19, no. 3 (1988). 434 – 50.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. Luther: Man between God and the Devil. Trans. Eileen Walliser-Schwartzbart. New Haven, 1989.Google Scholar
Oecolampadius, Johannes. IN EPISTOlam Ioannis apostoli catholicam primam. Nuremberg, 1524.Google Scholar
Oelke, Harry. Die Konfessionsbildung des 16. Jahrhunderts im Spiegel illustrierter Flugblätter. Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
Pelikan, Jaroslav. “Some Uses of Apocalypse in the Magisterial Reformers.” In The Apocalypse in English Renaissance Thought and Literature, ed. C. A. Patrides and Joseph Wittreich, 74–92. Manchester, 1985.Google Scholar
Polybius, . The Histories, III. Trans. W. R. Paton. Cambridge, MA, 1923.Google Scholar
Preuss, Hans. Vorstellungen vom Antichrist: im späteren Mittelalter, bei Luther und in der konfessionellen Polemik. Leipzig, 1906.Google Scholar
Roldan-Figueroa, Rady. “Filius Perditionis: The Propagandistic Use of a Biblical Motif in Spanish Evangelical Biblical Translations of the Sixteenth Century.” Sixteenth Century Journal 37, no. 4 (2007). 1027 – 54.Google Scholar
Russell, William R. “Martin Luther’s Understanding of the Pope as the Antichrist.” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 85 (1994). 32 – 44.Google Scholar
Stadtwald, Kurt . “Pope Alexander III’s Humiliation of Emperor Frederick Barbarosa as an Episode in Sixteenth-Century German History.” Sixteenth Century Journal 23, no. 4 (1992). 755 – 62.Google Scholar
Stephanus, Robert. Nouum IESV Christi D. N. Testamentum. Lvtetiae, 1550.Google Scholar
Tacitus, . Histories Books IV–V, Annals Books I–III. Cambridge, MA, 1931.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . “Apology.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers: The Writings of the Fathers Down to 325 A. D., ed. Alexander Robertson and James Donaldson, 3: 17–60. New York, 1903.Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo. De Donatione Constantini. Basel, 1519.Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo. Discourse on the Forgery of the Alleged Donation of Constantine, In Latin and English. Trans. Christopher B. Coleman. New Haven, 1922.Google Scholar
Velenus, Ulrichus. In hoc libello gravissimis, certissimisque, et in sacra scriptura fundatis racionibus variis probatur: Apostolum Petrum Rhomam non venisse, neque illic passum, proinde satis frivole et temere Rhomanus Pontifex se Petri successorem iactat et nominat. Nuremberg, 1521.Google Scholar