Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:28:03.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A contingent valuation analysis to determine profitability of establishing local organic wine markets in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2009

M. Brugarolas ,
L. Martinez-Carrasco ,
R. Bernabeu  and
A. Martinez-Poveda
M. Brugarolas*
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-envionmental Economy, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. de Beniel, km. 3,2 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.
L. Martinez-Carrasco
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-envionmental Economy, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. de Beniel, km. 3,2 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.
R. Bernabeu
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Castilla-La Mancha University, Campus Universitario s/n 02071 Albacete, Spain.
A. Martinez-Poveda
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-envionmental Economy, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. de Beniel, km. 3,2 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.
*
*Corresponding author: mbrugaro@umh.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this research an alternative is proposed for viticulture producers that would allow them to maintain their income and prevent the abandonment of their agricultural activity. The proposed alternative is the production of organic wine with subsequent commercialization in the local market. The suitability of the alternative is measured by the acceptance of the product in local markets. This acceptance was determined through contingent valuation, which relates probability of purchase to willingness to pay (WTP). Since regional differences could exist for product acceptance, the preliminary hypothesis was formulated that the importance of the viticulture sector in the regional economy makes consumers value farm work more highly and pay more for sustainable agricultural practices. Two regions of Spain were taken into consideration because of the different weight of their agricultural activity: Castile-La Mancha and the Community of Valencia. A survey of 800 wine consumers was made (400 from each region) to determine WTP. From the results it was shown on the one hand that organizing organic wine in local markets can be a profitable alternative for wine producers and, on the other hand, consumers from regions where wine production shares a larger proportion of the regional economy are willing to pay more for organic wine.

Keywords

organic winewillingness to paycontingent valuationregional differenceslocal markets
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 25 , Special Issue 1: “Food for Life”: Looking Beyond the Horizon , March 2010 , pp. 35 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1European Commission. 2007. Rural Development Policy 2007–2013. Available at Web site http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/employment/index_en.htm (verified 18 December 2008).Google Scholar
2Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 2007. Desarrollo Rural. Available at Web site http://www.mapa.es/es/desarrollo/desarrollo.htm (verified 4 December 2008).Google Scholar
3Mazón, T. and Aledo, A. 1996. El turismo inmobiliario. Ed. Diputación Provincial de Alicante, Alicante.Google Scholar
4Aledo, A. 1999. Desertificación y urbanización: el fracaso de la utopía. Boletín CF+S, 9. Available at Web site http://habitat.aq.upm.es/boletin/n9/aaale.html (verified 15 Febrary 2006).Google Scholar
5Calatrava, J. and Sayadi, S. 2004. Permanencia de la actividad agraria y políticas de desarrollo rural: un análisis a partir de un seguimiento (1981–2001) a explotaciones agrarias en zonas de montaña del sureste español. Revista de Estudios Agrosociales 204:207–218.Google Scholar
6Willer, H. and Yussefi, M. 2007. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends. IFOAM-International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
7Guptill, A. and Wilkins, J.L. 2002. Buying into the food system: trends in food retailing in the US and implications for local foods. Agricultural and Human Values 19:39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Stagl, S. 2002. Local organic food markets: potentials and limitations for contributing to sustainable development. Empirica 29:145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Weatherell, C., Tregear, A., and Allinson, J. 2003. In search of the concerned consumer: UK public perception of food, farming and buying local. Journal of Rural Studies 19:233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Saltmarsh, N. 2004. Mapping the Food Supply Chain in the Broads and Rivers Area. East Anglia Food Link, Watton.Google Scholar
11Chambers, S., Lobb, A., Butler, L., Harvey, K., and Bruce Traill, W. 2007. Local, national and imported foods: a qualitative study. Appetite 49(1):208–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Paddison, A. and Calderwood, E. 2007. Rural retailing: a sector in decline? International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 35(2):136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Murdoch, J. and Miele, M. 2004. Culinary networks and cultural connections: a conventions perspective. In Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (eds). Cultural Economy Reader. Blackwell, London. p. 231–248.Google Scholar
14Pretty, J.N., Ball, A.S., Lang, T., and Morison, J.I.L. 2005. Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket. Food Policy 30:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Pollan, M. 2006. The Omnivore's Dilemma. A Natural History of Four Meals. The Penguin Press, New York.Google Scholar
16Schneider, M.L. and Francis, C.A. 2005. Marketing locally produced foods: consumer and farmer opinions in Washington County, Nebraska. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(4):252–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Stephenson, G. and Lev, L. 2004. Common support for local agriculture in two contrasting Oregon communities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(4):210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 2008. Anuario de Estadística Agroalimentaria 2007. Available at Web site http://www.mapa.es (verified 18 December 2008).Google Scholar
19Nacional Statistics Institute. 2007. INEbase: Statistical Operations. Available at Web site http://www.ine.es (verified 18 December 2007).Google Scholar
20Castile-La Mancha Statistics Institute. 2008. Anuario Estadístico 2006 Available at Web site http://difusion.ies.jccm.es/wds/ReportFolders/ReportFolders.aspx?IF_ActivePath=P,45&IF_Language=esn (verified 7 March 2008).Google Scholar
21Valencia Statistics Institute. 2008. Información Estadística 2006 de la Comunidad Valenciana 2007. Available at Web site http://www.ive.es/ (verified 7 March 7 2008).Google Scholar
22Gil, J.M., Gracia, A., and Sánchez, M. 2000. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3:207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23McEachern, M.G. and McClean, P. 2002. Organic purchasing motivations and attitudes: are they ethical? International Journal of Consumer Studies 27(2):85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. 2008. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics 64(3):542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Wolf, M., Johnson, B., Cochran, K., and Hamilton, L. 2002. Consumer attitudes toward organically grown lettuce. Journal of Food Distribution Research 33(1):155–160.Google Scholar
26Conner, D. 2004. Beyond organic: information provision for sustainable agriculture in a changing market. Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(1):34–39.Google Scholar
27Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., and Martin, R.C. 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(4):193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Hamm, U., Gronefeld, F., and Halpin, D. 2002. Analysis of the European Market for Organic Food 2002 Organic Marketing Initiatives and Rural Development, 1. University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK.Google Scholar
29Joensen, M. 2003. Organic Foods in Spain 2003. Available at Web site http://www.organic-europe.net/country_reports/spain/joensen-2003-organic-food-spain.pdf (verified 10 November 2003).Google Scholar
30Sáez, P.M. 2002. La agricultura ecológica y la producción integrada en La Rioja. Libro Blanco de la Agricultura y el Desarrollo Rural. Ed. Mapa.Google Scholar
31Venkatachalam, L. 2004. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Cranfield, J.A.L. and Magnusson, E. 2003. Canadian consumer's willingness-to-pay for pesticide free food products: an ordered probit analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 6(4):13–30.Google Scholar
33McCluskey, J.J., Grimsrud, K.M., Ouchi, H., and Wahl, T.I. 2005. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Japan: consumers' food safety perceptions and willingness to pay for tested beef. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 49(2):197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Posri, W., Shankar, B., and Chadbunchachai, S. 2006. Consumer attitudes towards and willingness to pay for pesticide residue limit compliant ‘safe’ vegetables in northeast Thailand. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 19(1):81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Ruiz, A.V. and Iglesias, V. 1998. La conducta de compra en establecimientos detallistas: dos aplicaciones de los modelos logit. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 7(1):123–134.Google Scholar
36Verbeke, W., Ward, R., and Viaene, J. 2000. Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium: exploring BSE and television communication impact. Agribusiness 16(2):215–234.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Loureiro, M.L. and Lotade, J. 2005. Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics 53(1):129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Misra, S., Huang, Ch., and Ott, S. 1991. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh produce. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(2):218–227.Google Scholar
39Weaver, R.D., Evans, D.J., and Luloff, A. 1992. Pesticide use in tomato production: consumer concerns and willingness to pay. Agribusiness 8(2):131–142.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Buzby, J., Skees, J., and Ready, R. 1995. Using contingent valuation to value food safety: a case study of grapefruit and pesticide residues. In Caswell, J.A. (ed.). Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. p. 219–256.Google Scholar
41Haghiri, M. and McNamara, M.L. 2007. Predicting consumers' acceptability of pesticide-free fresh produce in Canada's maritime provinces: a probit analysis. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 19(4):45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Buzby, J., Fox, J., and Cruchfield, S. 1998. Measuring consumer benefits of food safety reductions. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Yue, C., Jensen, H.H., Mueller, D.S., Nonnecke, G.R., Bonnet, D., and Gleason, M.L. 2007. Estimating consumers' valuation of organic and cosmetically damaged apples. Hortscience 42(6):1366–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Gracia, A., Gil, J.M., and Sánchez, M. 1998. Potencial de Mercado de los Productos Ecológicos en Aragón. Ed. Diputación General de Aragón. 130 pp.Google Scholar
45Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., and Mittelhammer, R.C. 2001. Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2):404–416.Google Scholar
46Sánchez, M., Grande, I., Gil, J.M., and Gracia, A. 2001. Diferencias entre los segmentos del mercado en la disposición apagar por un alimento ecológico: valoración contingente y análisis conjunto. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 190:141–163.Google Scholar
47Loureiro, M.L. 2003. Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels. Food Policy 28(5–6):547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Riera, P. 1994. Manual de Valoración Contingente. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Madrid. 112 pp.Google Scholar
49Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare evaluation in contingent evaluation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66:332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Kaiser, H.F. 1958. El criterio del varimax para la rotación analítica en análisis factorial. Psychometrika XXIII:187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Mather, D., Knight, J., and Holdsworth, D. 2005. Pricing differentials for organic, ordinary and genetically modified food. Journal of Product and Brand Management 14(6):387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Loureiro, M.L., Gracia, A., and Nayga, R.M. 2006. Do consumers value nutritional labels? European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(2):249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., and Mittelhammer, R.C. 2002. Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labelled apples? Journal of Consumers Affairs 36(2):203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Guris, S., Metin, N., and Caglayan, E. 2007. The brand choice model of wine consumers: a multinomial logit model. Quality and Quantity 41(3):447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Azqueta, D. 1994. Valoración Económica de la Calidad Ambiental. McGraw-Hill, Madrid. 88 pp.Google Scholar
56Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
57Balistreri, E., McClelland, G., Poe, G., and Schulze, W. 2001. Can hypothetical questions reveal true values? A laboratory comparison of dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent values with auction values. Environmental and Resource Economics 18(3):275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar