Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:28:42.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of agrobiodiversity: an analysis of consumers preference for tomatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

Chiara M. Posadinu Open the ORCID record for Chiara M. Posadinu [Opens in a new window] ,
Monica Rodriguez ,
Fabio Madau  and
Giovanna Attene
Chiara M. Posadinu*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100, Sassari, Italy
Monica Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100, Sassari, Italy Centro Interdipartimentale per la Conservazione e Valorizzazione della Biodiversità Vegetale, University of Sassari, SS 127bis, km 28.500 Surigheddu, 07041, Alghero, Italy
Fabio Madau
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100, Sassari, Italy
Giovanna Attene
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100, Sassari, Italy Centro Interdipartimentale per la Conservazione e Valorizzazione della Biodiversità Vegetale, University of Sassari, SS 127bis, km 28.500 Surigheddu, 07041, Alghero, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Chiara Maria Posadinu, E-mail: cmposadinu@uniss.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The valorization of plant genetic resources and their direct use in local markets can make a significant contribution to the preservation of agrobiodiversity, while also contributing to the sustainability of rural communities. Indeed, plant genetic resources are a precious source of genes, and they represent an important crop heritage for the quality and sensory characteristics that are required by both farmers and consumers. However, an efficient strategy of agrobiodiversity conservation is strictly connected to product marketability and to consumer preferences. In the present study, choice experiments that involved 920 consumers were carried out to determine their willingness to pay for ancient local tomato varieties (landraces) rather than commercial varieties based on their preferences, and to determine how much they valued these products. The results obtained indicate that consumers are willing to pay premium prices for ancient local tomato varieties (an additional €0.90 kg−1), thus demonstrating their increasing attention to sustainable food and the willingness to contribute to agrobiodiversity conservation and enhancement. These results provide the basis for planning strategies and programs to support the cultivation of these landraces and the development of regional and national markets to acknowledge their characteristics, which will considerably increase the effectiveness and efficiency of conservation strategies.

Keywords

Ancient local varietieschoice experimentconsumer choicegenetic resourceslandraces conservationtomato landraces
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 237 - 247
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamowicz, W, Louviere, J and Swait, J (1998) Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. Final report to the Resource Valuation Branch, Damage Assessment Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
Annunziata, A and Vecchio, R (2016) Organic farming and sustainability in food choices: an analysis of consumer preference in southern Italy. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attene, G and Rodriguez, M (2008) Risorse genetiche di specie ortive della Sardegna. Euro Editrice, 7–16.Google Scholar
Attene, G, Rodriguez, M, Scintu, A and Rau, D (2015) Risorse genetiche di pomodoro della Sardegna. Nuova Stampa Color.Google Scholar
Bairagi, S, Custodio, MC, Durand-Morat, A and Demont, M (2021) Preserving cultural heritage through the valorization of Cordillera heirloom rice in the Philippines. Agriculture and Human Values 38, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldina, S, Picarella, ME, Troise, AD, Pucci, A, Roggieri, V, Ferracane, R, Barone, A, Fogliano, V and Mazzucccato, A (2016) Metabolite profiling of Italian tomato landraces with different fruit types. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balogh, P, Békési, D, Gorton, M, Popp, J and Lengyel, P (2016) Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products. Food Policy 61, 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Akiva, M and Lerman, S (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Botelho, A, Dinis, I, Lourenço-Gomes, L, Moreira, J, Costa Pinto, L and Simões, O (2018) The role of consumers in agrobiodiversity conservation: the case of traditional varieties of apples in Portugal. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42, 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugarolas, M, Martínez-Poveda, A and Ruiz, JJ (2009) A competitive strategy for vegetable products: traditional varieties of tomato in the local market. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, SB (2000) The issues of in-situ conservation of crop genetic resources. In Brush, SB (ed.), Genes in the Field: On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, 1st Edn. Boca Raton: IPGRI, Lewis Publishers, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Causse, M, Buret, M, Robini, K and Verschave, P (2003) Inheritance of nutritional and sensory quality traits in fresh market tomato and relation to consumer preferences. Journal of Food Science 68, 2342–2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causse, M, Friguet, C, Coiret, C, Lépicier, M, Navez, B, Lee, M, Holthuysen, N, Sinesio, F, Moneta, E and Grandillo, S (2010) Consumer preferences for fresh tomato at the European scale: a common segmentation on taste and firmness. Journal of Food Science 75, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceccarelli, S, Grando, S, Tutwiler, R, Baha, J, Martini, M, Salahieh, H, Goodchild, A and Michael, M (2000) A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. I Selection phase. Euphytica 111, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) Convention on biological diversity: text and annexes Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. Available at https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/.Google Scholar
Corrado, G, Piffanelli, P, Caramante, M, Coppola, M and Rao, R (2013) SNP genotyping reveals genetic diversity between cultivated landraces and contemporary varieties of tomato. BMC Genomics 14, 835–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de-Magistris, T and Gracia, A (2016) Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for sustainable food products: the case of organically and locally grown almonds in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production 118, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union (2013) Agricultural genetic resources – from conservation to sustainable use Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee (COM 2013, 838 final) Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
FAO (1996) International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Commission, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO (2010) Second report on the state of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Statistical Database Available at http://www.fao.org/home/en [Accessed 17 February 2020].Google Scholar
Ficiciyan, A, Loos, J, Sievers-Glotzbach, S and Tscharntke, T (2018) More than yield: ecosystem services of traditional versus modern crop varieties revisited. Sustainability 10, 2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, EA, Cherfas, J and Hodgkin, T (2011) Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security. Sustainability 3, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullana-Pericàs, M, Conesa, MÀ, Douthe, C, El Aou-ouad, H, Ribas-Carbó, M and Galmés, J (2019) Tomato landraces as a source to minimize yield losses and improve fruit quality under water deficit conditions. Agricultural Water Management 223, 105722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furesi, R, Madau, FA, Palomba, A and Pulina, P (2014) Stated preferences for consumption of sea urchins: a choice experiment in Sardinia (Italy). International Journal on Food System Dynamics 5, 111–119.Google Scholar
García, MC, Piqueras-Aljarilla, E, Font, R, Pascual-Asso, F, Gómez, P and Del Rio, M (2016) Physico-chemical characterization of cherry tomatoes grown under organic agriculture. Acta Horticulturae. III International Symposium on Organic Greenhouse Horticulture 1164, 513–518.Google Scholar
Gepts, P (2006) Plant genetic resource conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Science 46, 2278–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giampietri, E, Verneau, F, Del Giudice, T, Carfora, V and Finco, A (2018) A theory of planned behavior perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Quality and Preference 64, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giupponi, L, Borgonovo, G, Panseri, S and Giorgi, A (2019) Multidisciplinary study of a little-known landrace of Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn. of Valtellina (Italian Alps). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 66, 783–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, A, Sánchez, AM, Jurado, F and Mallor, C (2020) Making use of sustainable local plant genetic resources: would consumers support the recovery of a traditional purple carrot? Sustainability 12, 6549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, WH and Hensher, DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B Methodological 37, 681–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, N, Wright, RE and Adamovicz, V (1998) Use choice experiment to value the environment design issue current experience and future prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics 11, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, JR (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188, 618–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, J and McFadden, D (1984) Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 52, 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, TP, Adamawicz, W and Carlsson, F (2017) Choice experiment. In Champ, P, Boyle, K and Brown, T (eds), A Primer on Non-Market Valuation, 2nd Edn. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 133–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISMEA Mercati (2020) Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA). Data Available at http://www.ismeamercati.it/analisi-e-studio-filiere-agroalimentari (Accessed in March 2020).Google Scholar
ISTAT (2019) Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Data Available at https://www.istat.it/it/popolazione-e-famiglie?dati (Accessed 17th June 2021).Google Scholar
Jackson, LE, Pascual, U and Hodgkin, T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kader, AA (2008) Flavor quality of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88, 1863–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafitte, HR, Edmeades, GO and Taba, S (1997) Adaptive strategies identified among tropical maize landraces for nitrogen-limited environments. Field Crops Research 49, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K (1991) Modern Consumption Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lázaro, A (2018) Tomato landraces: an analysis of diversity and preferences. Plant Genetic Resources 16, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limesurvey GmbH LimeSurvey: an open source survey tool LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany URL. Available at http://www.limesurvey.org.Google Scholar
Louviere, JJ, Hensher, DA and Swait, JD (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangham, LJ, Hanson, K and McPake, B (2009) How to do (or not to do)… designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning 24, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manski, C (1977) The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8, 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, A, Papa, R, Bitocchi, E, Mosconi, P, Nanni, L, Negri, V, Picarella, ME, Siligato, F, Soressi, GP, Tiranti, B and Veronesi, F (2008) Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of Italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCouch, S (2004) Diversifying selection in plant breeding. PLoS Biology 2, 1507–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerding, SGH, Trajer, N and Lehberger, M (2019) What is local food? The case of consumer preferences for local food labeling of tomatoes in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production 207, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, JC and Tanksley, SD (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, R, Raffaelli, R and Thilmany-McFadden, D (2011) Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: a review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14, 121–142.Google Scholar
Oehen, B, Meier, C, Holzherr, P and Förster, I (2018) Strategies to valorize agrobiodiversity In Proceedings of the 13th European International Farming Systems Association (IFSA) Symposium, Farming Systems: Facing Uncertainties and Enhancing Opportunities, Chania, Crete, Greece, 1–5 July 2018.Google Scholar
Oltman, AE, Jervis, SM and Drake, MA (2014) Consumer attitudes and preferences for fresh market tomatoes. Journal of Food Science 79, S2091–S2097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Caselles, C, Brugarolas, M and Martínez-Carrasco, L (2020) Traditional varieties for local markets: a sustainable proposal for agricultural SMEs. Sustainability 12, 4517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polegri, L and Negri, V (2010) Molecular markers for promoting agro-biodiversity conservation: a case study from Italy. How cowpea landraces were saved from extinction. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57, 867–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocchi, L, Paolotti, L, Cortina, C and Boggia, A (2016) Conservation of landrace: the key role of the value for agrobiodiversity conservation. An application on ancient tomatoes varieties. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8, 307–3016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, M, Scintu, A, Posadinu, CM, Xu, Y, Nguyen, CV, Sun, H, Bitocchi, E, Bellucci, E, Papa, R, Fei, Z, Giovannoni, JJ, Rau, D and Attene, G (2020) GWAS Based on RNA-Seq SNPs and high-throughput phenotyping combined with climatic data highlights the reservoir of valuable genetic diversity in regional tomato landraces. Genes 11, 1387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacco, A, Cammareri, M, Vitiello, A, Palombieri, S, Riccardi, R, Spigno, P and Grandillo, S (2017) Italian traditional tomato varieties: a focus on the Campania region. In I Congrés de la Tomaca Valenciana: La Tomaca Valenciana d'El Perelló, El Perelló, Spain, 17 May 2017.Google Scholar
Sardaro, R, Girone, S, Acciani, C, Bozzo, F, Petrontino, A and Fucilli, V (2016) Agro-biodiversity of Mediterranean crops: farmers’ preferences in support of a conservation programme for olive landraces. Biological Conservation 201, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, S, Begemann, F and Harrer, S (2007) Agrobiodiversity monitoring—documentation at European. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scintu, A (2014) Characterization of a Wide Collection of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for Morpho-Phenological, Quality and Resistance Traits (Dissertation). University of Sassari.Google Scholar
Serrano-Megías, M and López-Nicolás, JM (2006) Application of agglomerative hierarchical clustering to identify consumer tomato preferences: influence of physicochemical and sensory characteristics on consumer response. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skreli, E, Imami, D, Chan, C, Canavari, M, Zhllima, E and Pire, E (2017) Assessing consumer preferences and willingness to pay for organic tomatoes in Albania: a conjoint choice experiment study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, e0114–e0126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spataro, G and Negri, V (2013) The European seed legislation on conservation varieties: focus, implementation, present and future impact on landrace on farm conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60, 2421–2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L (1927) A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, TCC, Maxted, N, Scholten, M and Ford-Lloyd, B (2005) Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources 3, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Posadinu et al. supplementary material

Posadinu et al. supplementary material 1

Download Posadinu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Posadinu et al. supplementary material

Posadinu et al. supplementary material 2

Download Posadinu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.9 KB