Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:36:14.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlled studies further the development of practical guidelines to manage dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in cranberry production with short-term flooding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

James M. O'Connell ,
Hilary A. Sandler ,
Lynn S. Adler  and
Frank L. Caruso
James M. O'Connell
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
Hilary A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
Lynn S. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Frank L. Caruso
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: hsandler@umext.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Flooding is an inexpensive cultural practice used for pest management in Massachusetts cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) production. This project examined the use of short-term floods (<72 h) for dodder (Cuscuta gronovii Willd.) management under controlled conditions. Using incubators, seed was submerged in water for 0, 24 and 48 h at 10, 15 and 20°C (simulating spring water temperatures) and 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h at 15, 20 and 25°C (simulating summer water temperatures). Two 1-year controlled studies (field and greenhouse) evaluated three flood durations (0, 24 and 48 h) and four flood initiations (1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after early seedling emergence (AEE)). Treated seeds were planted to cranberry vines and to Petri dishes; percent germination, degree of dodder attachment and dodder biomass data were collected. Treatments had limited effect on seed germination. Flooding 4 weeks AEE resulted in the lowest mean attachment ratings and dodder stem biomass on cranberry. This preliminary work provides evidence that flooding may retard dodder stem growth rather than reducing seed germination and that floods initiated after some time has elapsed after early emergence may be more effective than those initiated closer to the time of seedling emergence. More information is needed to thoroughly understand the processes involved; however, small projects such as this can provide interim guidelines that growers can immediately consider when deciding on a dodder management program.

Keywords

non-chemical weed controlparasitic plantsfloodingcultural practicesintegrated weed management
Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 269 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eck, P. 1990. The American Cranberry. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Sandler, H.A. 2010. Weed priority survey. UMass Cranberry Station Newsletter. http://www.umass.edu/cranberry/downloads/newsletters/mar10.pdf (accessed 3 May 2011).Google Scholar
Stevens, O.A. 1957. Weights of seed and numbers per plant. Weeds 5:46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulebrouck, K., Ameloot, E., Brys, R., Tanghe, L., Verheyen, K., and Hermy, M. 2009. Hidden in the host—unexpected vegetative hibernation of the holoparasite Cuscuta epithymum (L.) L. and its implications for population persistence. Flora 204:306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H.L. 1954. Dodder overwintering as haustorial tissue within Cuscuta galls. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 61:99–196.Google Scholar
Devlin, R.M. and Deubert, K.H. 1980. Control of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) on cranberry bogs with butralin. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 34:399–405.Google Scholar
Sandler, H.A. 2010. Managing Cuscuta gronovii (swamp dodder) in cranberry requires an integrated approach. Sustainability 2:660–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, H.A. and Ghantous, K. 2007. Germination of swamp dodder seeds planted near a commercial cranberry farm [abstract]. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 61:65.Google Scholar
Hunsberger, L.K., Autio, W.R., DeMoranville, C.J., and Sandler, H.A. 2006. Mechanical removal of summer dodder infestations and impacts on cranberry yield. HortTechnology 16:78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J.R., Sandler, H.A., and Romaneo, L.K. 2005. Management of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii Willd.) in cranberry may be enhanced by the integration of a nontoxic household cleaner. Crop Protection 24:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J.H. 1990. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) control in newly seeded alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with glyphosate. Weed Technology 4:880–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shawa, A. 1980. Control of weeds in cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) with glyphosate and terbacil. Weed Science 28:565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghantous, K.M., Sandler, H.A., Jeranyama, P., and Autio, W.R. 2009. Response of cranberry vines to hand-held flame cultivators-initial year evaluation [abstract]. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 63:2.Google Scholar
Bergman, H.F. 1925. The respiratory activity of various parts of the cranberry plant in relation to flooding injury. American Journal of Botany 12:641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, A.L., Sylvia, M.M., Kusek, C.C., and DeMoranville, C.J. 1997. Flooding in cranberry to minimize insecticide and fungicide inputs. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12:50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, A.L., Averill, M.M., and DeMoranville, C.J. 1994. Alternative management strategies: Impact of late water on cranberry fruitworm and mites. Cranberries 58(4):4, 23–25.Google Scholar
DeMoranville, C.J., Sandler, H.A., Shumaker, D.E., Averill, A.L., Caruso, F.L., Sylvia, M.M., and Pober, D.M. 2005. Fall flooding for management of cranberry fruitworm (Acrobasis vaccinii) and dewberry (Rubus hispidus) in Massachusetts cranberry production. Journal of Crop Protection 24:999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockfield, S.D. and Mahr, D.L. 1992. Flooding cranberry beds to control blackheaded fireworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 85:2383–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botelho, M.R. and Vanden Heuvel, J.E. 2006. Preliminary assessment of the impact of current flooding practices on nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations of cranberry. HortTechnology 16:277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, D. 1998. Differential response of palmleaf morningglory (Ipomoea wrightii) and pitted morning glory (Ipomoea lacunosa) to flooding. Weed Science 46:217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, C.H., Reddy, K.N., and Poston, D.H. 2004. Factors affecting seed germination, seedling emergence, and survival of texasweed (Caperonia palustris). Weed Science 52:989–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, H.A. and Mason, J. 2010. Flooding to manage dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) and broad-leaved weed species in cranberry: An innovative use of a traditional strategy. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, E.E. 1950. Studies of seed germination, seed identification, and host relationships in dodders, Cuscuta spp. Cornell Experiment Station Memoir 294:1–56.Google Scholar
Botelho, M.R. and Vanden Heuvel, J.E. 2005. High dissolved oxygen concentration of floodwater reduces carbohydrate concentration of cranberry uprights during flooding. HortScience 40:569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden Heuvel, J.E. and Goffinet, M.C. 2008. The effects of flood initiation timing and water temperature during flooding on nonstructural carbohydrate concentration and anatomy of cranberry. HortScience 43:338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMoranville, C.J. and Sandler, H.A. 2008. Cultural practices in cranberry production: Sanding and pruning. In Sandler, H.A. and DeMoranville, C.J. (eds). Cranberry Production: A Guide for Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts Publication (CP-08), East Wareham. p. 16–21.Google Scholar
Sandler, H.A. 2010. Weed management. In Sylvia, M.M. and Guerin, N. (eds). Cranberry Chart Book-Management Guide for Massachusetts. UMass Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA. p. 21–41.Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O. and Pierce, F.J. 2002. Generalized linear models. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 344–347.Google Scholar
Reddy, K.N. and Singh, M. 1992. Germination and emergence of hairy beggarsticks (Bidens pilosa). Weed Science 40:195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, J.M. 2010. Use of short-term floods as an additional management strategy for controlling dodder (Cuscuta gronovii Willd.) in commercial cranberry production. Masters thesis, Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. p. 62.Google Scholar
Teixeira, L.A.F. and Averill, A.L. 2006. Evaluation of flooding for cultural control of Sparganothis sulfureana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in cranberry bogs. Environmental Entomology 35:670–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar