Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:44:21.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop and cattle responses to tillage systems for integrated crop–livestock production in the Southern Piedmont, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2007

A.J. Franzluebbers  and
J.A. Stuedemann
A.J. Franzluebbers*
Affiliation:
USDA–Agricultural Research Service, 1420 Experiment Station Road, Watkinsville, GA 30677, USA.
J.A. Stuedemann
Affiliation:
USDA–Agricultural Research Service, 1420 Experiment Station Road, Watkinsville, GA 30677, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: afranz@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Integration of crops and livestock has the potential to provide a multitude of benefits to soil and water conservation and nutrient cycling efficiency, while reducing economic risk and increasing profitability. We conducted a field study from May 2002 to October 2005 to determine crop and cattle responses to three management factors on a Typic Kanhapludult in Georgia, USA. Summer grain/winter cover [sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) or corn (Zea mays L.)/rye (Secale cereale L.)] and winter grain/summer cover [wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R. Br.)] were managed with either conventional tillage (CT) or no tillage (NT) and with or without cattle grazing of cover crops. All crops were successfully established, irrespective of tillage and cover crop management. Although pearl millet was often lower in the plant stand with NT than with CT, plants compensated with greater biomass on an area basis. Across years, grain yield of sorghum (1.9 Mg ha−1 during three seasons) and corn (7.3 Mg ha−1 in one season) was 25% greater under NT than under CT when the cover crop was not grazed. Wheat grain yield (2.7 Mg ha−1 during three seasons) was unaffected by tillage and cover crop management. Unharvested stover production of summer grain crops was greater with NT than with CT (6.5 versus 4.1 Mg ha−1; P<0.001). Grazing rye rather than allowing it to accumulate as surface residue reduced summer grain yield 23% and reduced standing grain-crop dry matter 26% under NT, but had no effect under CT. In contrast, grazing pearl millet rather than allowing it to accumulate as surface residue increased wheat standing dry matter yield by 25±14% (mean±standard deviation among 3 years and two tillage systems). Ungrazed cover crop production was greater under NT than under CT for rye (7.0 versus 6.0 Mg ha−1; P=0.03) and pearl millet (10.2 versus 7.6 Mg ha−1; P=0.01). Calf daily gain was either greater or tended to be greater under NT than under CT on rye (2.27 versus 2.09 kg head−1 d−1; P=0.15) and pearl millet (2.05 versus 1.81 kg head−1 d−1; P=0.05). Total cattle gain per grazing season was either greater or tended to be greater with NT than with CT on rye (350 versus 204 kg ha−1; P=0.01) and pearl millet (324 versus 277 kg ha−1; P=0.15). Net return over variable costs was greater with grazing than without grazing of cover crops (US$302 versus −US$63 ha−1; P<0.001). Livestock grazing of cover crops had variable effects on subsequent crop production, but increased economic return and diversity overall. Therefore, an integrated crop–livestock production system with conservation tillage is recommended as a viable option for producers to diversify farming operations to avoid risk, improve ecological production of crops, and potentially avoid environmental damage from soil erosion and nutrient loss.

Keywords

cattle productionconservation tillagecorncover croppingpearl milletryesorghumwheat
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 168 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gates, R.N. 2003. Integration of perennial forages and grazing in sod based crop rotations. In Proceedings of the Sod Based Cropping Systems Conference, 20–21 February 2003, Quincy, FL. p. 7–14.Google Scholar
2 Gliessman, S.R. 1998. Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI. p. 357.Google Scholar
3 Follett, R.F., Stewart, J.W.B., and Cole, C.V. 1987. Soil fertility and organic matter as critical components of production systems. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 19, Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Franzluebbers, A.J., Stuedemann, J.A., Schomberg, H.H., and Wilkinson, S.R. 2000. Soil organic C and N pools under long-term pasture management in the Southern Piedmont, USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Langdale, G.W., West, L.T., Bruce, R.R., Miller, W.P., and Thomas, A.W. 1992. Restoration of eroded soil with conservation tillage. Soil Technology 5:81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Franzluebbers, A.J., Hons, F.M., and Saladino, V.A. 1995. Sorghum, wheat and soybean production as affected by long-term tillage, crop sequence and N fertilization. Plant and Soil 173:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Wagger, M.G. and Denton, H.P. 1989. Tillage effects on grain yields in a wheat, double-crop soybean, and corn rotation. Agronomy Journal 81:493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Karlen, D.L. and Gooden, D.T. 1987. Tillage systems for wheat production in the southeastern Coastal Plains. Agronomy Journal 79:582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Frederick, J.R. and Bauer, P.J. 1996. Winter wheat responses to surface and deep tillage on the southeastern Coastal Plain. Agronomy Journal 88:829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Langdale, G.W., Hargrove, W.L., and Giddens, J. 1984. Residue management in double-crop conservation tillage systems. Agronomy Journal 76:689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Cassel, D.K. and Wagger, M.G. 1996. Residue management for irrigated maize grain and silage production. Soil and Tillage Research 39:101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Hargrove, W.L. 1985. Influence of tillage on nutrient uptake and yield of corn. Agronomy Journal 77:763–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Edwards, J.H., Thurlow, D.L., and Eason, J.T. 1988. Influence of tillage and crop rotation on yields of corn, soybean, and wheat. Agronomy Journal 80:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Groffman, P.M., Hendrix, P.F., and Crossley, D.A. Jr 1987. Nitrogen dynamics in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems with inorganic fertilizer or legume nitrogen inputs. Plant and Soil 97:315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Sainju, U.M. and Singh, B.P. 2001. Tillage, cover crop, and kill-planting date effects on corn yield and soil nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 93:878–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Schwab, E.B., Reeves, D.W., Burmester, C.H., and Raper, R.L. 2002. Conservation tillage systems for cotton in the Tennessee Valley. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Tollner, E.W., Calvert, G.V., and Langdale, G. 1990. Animal trampling effects on soil physical properties of two southeastern U.S. Ultisols. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 33:75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Franzluebbers, A.J. and Stuedemann, J.A. 2005. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools in response to tall fescue endophyte infection, fertilization, and cultivar. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Ashford, D.L. and Reeves, D.W. 2003. Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Schomberg, H.H., Stuedemann, J.A., Franzluebbers, A.J., and Wilkinson, S.R. 2000. Spatial distribution of extractable phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium as influenced by fertilizer and tall fescue endophyte status. Agronomy Journal 92:981–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 SAS Institute. 2002. SAS for Windows, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
22 Saxena, A., Singh, D.V., and Joshi, N.L. 1996. Autotoxic effects of pearl millet aqueous extracts on seed germination and seedling growth. Journal of Arid Environments 33:255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Hatfield, J.L., Sauer, T.J., and Prueger, J.H. 2001. Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency. A review. Agronomy Journal 93:271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Tanaka, D.L., Karn, J.F., Liebig, M.A., Kronberg, S.L., and Hanson, J.D. 2005. An integrated approach to crop/livestock systems: forage and grain production for swath grazing. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Makowski, D., Wallach, D., and Meynard, J.-M. 1999. Models of yield, grain protein, and residual mineral nitrogen responses to applied nitrogen for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 91:377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Halvorson, A.D., Nielsen, D.C., and Reule, C.A. 2004. Nitrogen fertilization and rotation effects on no-till dryland wheat production. Agronomy Journal 96:1196–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Kriegshauser, T.D., Tuinstra, M.R., and Hancock, J.D. 2006. Variation in nutritional value of sorghum hybrids with contrasting seed weight characteristics and comparisons with maize in broiler chicks. Crop Science 46:695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Karn, J.F., Tanaka, D.L., Liegig, M.A., Ries, R.E., Kronberg, S.L., and Hanson, J.D. 2005. An integrated approach to crop/livestock systems: wintering beef cows on swathed crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar