Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:23:25.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Graft is good: the economic and environmental benefits of grafted naranjilla in the Andean region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2016

Corinna Clements ,
Jeffrey Alwang ,
Victor Barrera  and
Juan Manuel Dominguez
Corinna Clements
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. 250 Drillfield Drive, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
Jeffrey Alwang*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. 250 Drillfield Drive, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
Victor Barrera
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Santa Catalina, INIAP, Panamericana Sur Km. 1, Quito, Ecuador.
Juan Manuel Dominguez
Affiliation:
ESPAE-ESPOL, Oficina Central INIAP, Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito, Ecuador.
*
*Corresponding author: alwangj@vt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Naranjilla cultivation is highly profitable in many parts of the Andean foothills in Colombia and Ecuador. Its susceptibility to soil-borne diseases, however, lowers its economic benefits, reduces sustainability of production and increases its contribution to environmental degradation. This paper presents an analysis of the potential market and non-market benefits of research that developed and tested the grafting of common naranjilla onto disease-resistant rootstock. Grafting reduces the need for pesticide application and increases the longevity and sustainability of the plant. An economic surplus approach, carefully calibrated to reflect the realities of naranjilla production, was employed to show the large benefits from such research. Environmental and health benefits are very close in magnitude to market-mediated surplus gains. The results show substantial potential benefits from an outreach program to diffuse the new technology.

Keywords

Naranjillasustainable developmentdeforestationeconomic surplus
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 306 - 318
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P.D. 1995. Science under Scarcity. CAB International, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Alwang, J. 2012. Science for agricultural growth in Latin America and the Caribbean. In Crsp, I. (ed.). IPM CRSP 2011-2012 Annual Report. Office of International Research, Education and Development, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
Andrade, R. 2004. Caracterización de las condiciones agro-socio-económicas de las familias productoras de naranjilla (Solanum quitoense) en la región Amazónica del Ecuador. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, Quito. http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/22000/1160 Google Scholar
Azam-Ali, S., Sesay, A., Karikari, S., Massawe, F., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Bannayan, M., and Hampson, K. 2001. Assessing the potential of an underutilized crop – a case study using bambara groundnut. Experimental Agriculture 37:433–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertzky, M., Ravilious, C., Araujo Navas, A.L., Kapos, V., Carrión, D., Chíu, M., and Dickson, B. 2010. Carbon, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Exploring Co-Benefits. Ecuador. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. 1981. The colonization of humid tropical areas in Ecuador. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 2:15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellon, C. 2012. Demand for Food in Ecuador and the United States: Evidence from Household-Level Survey Data. Master of Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.Google Scholar
Heiser, C.B. 1993. The naranjilla (Solanum quitoense), the cocona (Solanum sessiliflorum) and their hybrid. In Gustafson, J.P., Apples, R. and Raven, P. (eds). Gene Conservation and Exploitation. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, NY. p.29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignjatov, M., Milošević, D., Nikolić, Z., Gvozdanović-Varga, J., Jovičić, D., and Zdjelar, G. 2012. Fusarium oxysporum as causal agent of tomato wilt and fruit rot. Pesticidi i fitomedicina 27:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INIAP. 2013a. Costos Practica Convencional-Naranjilla. Unpublished production budgets. For access, please contact Victor Barrera ().Google Scholar
INIAP. 2013b. Costos Practicas Hibrida Puyo. Unpublished production budgets. For access, please contact Victor Barrera ().Google Scholar
INIAP. 2013c. Costos Practicas MIP Naranjilla. Unpublished production budgets. For access, please contact Victor Barrera ().Google Scholar
Jaenicke, H., Höschle-Zeledon, I., and (eds.) 2006. Strategic Framework for Underutilized Plant Species Research and Development. International Centre for Underutilised Crops, Rome, Italy, Colombo, Sri Lanka and Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species.Google Scholar
MAGAP. 2014. Tabla de Superficie, Produccion y Rendimiento -Naranjilla – Nacional [Online]. Available at Web site: http://sinagap.agricltura.gob.ec/index.php/site-map/2-produccion (verified 10 February 2014).Google Scholar
Mainville, N., Webb, J., Lucotte, M., Davidson, R., Betancourt, O., Cueva, E., and Mergler, D. 2006. Decrease of soil fertility and release of mercury following deforestation in the Andean Amazon, Napo River Valley, Ecuador. Science of the Total Environment 368:88–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcmurray, D. and Gross, J. 2007. Teaching about globalization and food in Ecuador. Food, Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 10:472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mecham, J. 2001. Causes and consequences of deforestation in Ecuador. Centro de Investigacion de los Bosques Tropicales, Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Mensah, E.C. and Wohlgenant, M.K. 2010. A market impact analysis of soybean technology adoption. Research in Business and Economics Journal 1:1.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Z., Abdulatif, I., and Mahir Abdullah, A. 2011. Economic importance of tropical and subtropical fruits. In Yahia, E.M. (ed.). Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Mosandl, R., Günter, S., Stimm, B., and Weber, M. 2008. Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America. In Beck, E., Bendix, J., Kottke, I., Makeschin, F., and Mosandl, R. (eds). Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B., and Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochoa, J. and Ellis, M. 2005. Seed transmission of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. quitoense appears an important cause of naranjilla collapse in Ecuador. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome.Google Scholar
Ochoa, J.B., Yangari, B.F., Ellis, M.A., and Williams, R.N. 2004. Two new formae specialis of Fusarium oxysporum, causing vascular wilt on babaco (Carica heilbornii var. pentagona) and vascular wilt on naranjilla (Solanum quitoense) in Ecuador. Fitopatología 39:10–17.Google Scholar
Preciados, L.S., Bulayog, Ma. S.B., Borines, L., and Guadalquever, G. 2012a. Ex-ante impact assessment of Phytophthora disease control for jackfruit in Region VIII, southern Philippines. In Oakeshott, J. and Hall, D. (eds). Smallholder HOPES—Horticulture, People and Soil Proceedings of the ACIAR–PCAARRD Southern Philippines Fruits and Vegetables Program Meeting, 3 July 2012. Cebu, Philippines.Google Scholar
Preciados, L.S., Bulayog, M.S.B., Soguilon, C., and Montiel, C. 2012b. Gross margin impact analysis on adoption of Phytophthora control strategies for durian in Region XI, southern Philippines. In Oakeshott, J. and Hall, D. (eds). Smallholder HOPES—Horticulture, People and Soil Proceedings of the ACIAR–PCAARRD Southern Philippines Fruits and Vegetables Program Meeting, 3 July 2012. Cebu, Philippines.Google Scholar
Revelo, J., Vitero, P., Vásquez, W., Valverde, F., León, J., and Gallegos, P. 2010. Manual del Cultivo Ecologico de la Naranjilla. INIAP, Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
Sabbe, S., Damme, P.V., and Verbeke, W. 2013. European market environment for selected Latin American tropical fruit species. Acta Horticulturae 975:615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowell, A. 2011. The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Grafted Naranjilla in Ecuador. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Purdue University. Available through Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Sowell, A. and Shively, G. 2012. Economic and environmental impacts of grafted naranjilla. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 21:30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadele, Z. and Assefa, K. 2012. Increasing food production in Africa by boosting the productivity of understudied crops. Agronomy 2:240–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, W. 2012. Plantas de naranjilla de jugo INIAP-Quitoense 2009, vendidas y distribución geografica Boletin Divulgativo No. 354, INIAP, Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Weerhewa, J., Rajapakse, C., and Pushpakumara, G. 2013. An analysis of consumer demand for fruits in Sri Lanka. 1981–2010. Appetite 60:252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, K. 2005. A Risk Assessment of Pesticide Application Practices of Farmers of Naranjilla (Solanum quitoense) in the Pastaza Province of Ecuador. Master of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar