Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:16:38.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internationalization of the organic fruit market: The case of Washington State's organic apple exports to the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Gregory M. Peck ,
Preston K. Andrews ,
Cindy Richter  and
John P. Reganold
Gregory M. Peck*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Preston K. Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Cindy Richter
Affiliation:
Pacific Organic Produce, San Francisco, California, 94109, USA.
John P. Reganold
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Email, gpeck@wsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Production of some organic commodities, such as apples, is heavily concentrated in the United States (US), with Washington State being the leading US producer of organic apples. In 2003, there were 4047 ha of certified organic apple orchards in Washington State, an all-time high and a more than tenfold increase since 1989. But this growth has not occurred without difficulties. Washington State's organic apple growers have encountered international supply and demand pressures forcing them to seek new markets, such as the European Union (EU). In this paper, we explore the complexities of the international marketing of organic fruit, using organic apple production in Washington State and market opportunities for this organic fruit in the EU, as a case study. We find that as a result of the expansion of organic apple plantings in Washington State, there has been a decrease in the price premiums, which traditionally offset the greater costs of organic production and which originally motivated many Washington growers to certify their apple orchards. We also find that increased demand for organic fruits in the EU has been outpacing supply, making EU member states the most important export market for Washington's organic apples. However, despite the unification of US standards by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and an overriding EU standard, an entanglement of regulatory bodies from around the world is involved in the certification of organic products. For example, growers and marketers may have to interact with as many as six different regulatory bodies in order to export organic produce from the US to the EU. This study shows that while the EU market remains a promising destination for US organic apples, organic growers and marketers must plan ahead and thoroughly understand the multitude of regulations involved in the international trade of organic fruits.

Keywords

applescertificationEuropean UnionexportsorganicregulationsWashington State
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO (1999) Organic Food and Beverages: World Supply and Major European MarketsGeneva, Switzerland ITCGoogle Scholar
2Kortbech-Olesen, R (2003) Market. In Yussefi, M., Willer, H. (eds). The World of Organic Agriculture 2003: Statistics and Future Prospects. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany.Google Scholar
3Dimitri, C. and Greene, C. 2002. Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market. Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 777. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Market and Trade Economics Division and Resource Economics Division, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4Lohr, L (1998) Implications of organic certification for market structure and trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 5 1125–1129Google Scholar
5Willer, H, Richter, T. (2003) Europe. In Yussefi, M., Willer, H. (eds). The World of Organic Agriculture 2003: Statistics and Future Prospects. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany. p. 73–94.Google Scholar
6Jones, P., Clarke-Hill, C., Shears, P., Hillier, D (2001) Retailing organic foods. British Food Journal 103: 5 358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wier, M., Calverley, C. (2002) Market potential for organic foods in Europe. British Food Journal 104(1): 45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Greene, C. and Kremen, A. 2003. U.S. Organic farming in 2000–2001: Adoption of certified systems. Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 780. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Resource Economics Division, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
9Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Andrews, P.K., Hinman, H.R. (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410: 6831 926–929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Mäder, P., Fließbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., Niggli, U. (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296(5573): 1694–1697Google Scholar
11Dimitri, C. and Richman, N.J. 2000. Organic food markets in transition. Policy Studies Report no. 14. Henry A. Wallace Center for Agricultural and Environmental Policy, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
12Foster, C. (2000) International market growth and prospects. In Wright, S., McCrea, D. (eds). Handbook of Organic Food Processing and Production 2nd Blackwell Science, Malden, MA62–77.Google Scholar
13USDA-NASS. (2003) Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2003 Annual Summary. US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
14Natural Resources Defense Council (1989) Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in our Children's Food. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York.Google Scholar
15Granatstein, D. and Kirby, E. 2002. Current trends in organic tree fruit production. Report no. 4. Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources (CSANR), Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA.Google Scholar
16Granatstein, D., Kirby, E. (2002) 2002 Organic Tree Fruit Acreage. Washington State University Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Wenatchee, WA.Google Scholar
17Washington State Growers Clearinghouse. 2004. Available at Web site http://www.waclearinghouse.org/ (verified 16 January 2004). Washington State Growers Clearinghouse, Wenatchee, WA.Google Scholar
18Offner, J. (2003) Snokist strikes deal to delve into organics. The Packer, 14 July.Google Scholar
19Warner, G. (2003) Stemilt dedicates organic plant. Good Fruit Grower 54(13): 14Google Scholar
20Zygmont, J. 2000. U.S. organic fruit: Export opportunities and competition in the international market. 96th Annual Meeting 2000 Proceedings, Washington Horticultural Association, Wenatchee, Washington. p. 68–80.Google Scholar
21FAOFAO 2001. World Markets for Organic Fruit and Vegetables: Opportunities for Developing Countries in the Production and Export of Organic Horticultural Products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/International Trade Centre/Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (FAO/ITC/CTA), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
22DEFRA. 2003. Organic food and farming, action plan area, England's organic sector: prospects for growth. Available at Web site http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/organic/actionplan/prospects.htm (verified 13 January 2004). Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK.Google Scholar
23Haumann, B. (2003) North America. In Yussefi, M., Willer, H. (eds).The World of Organic Agriculture 2003: Statistics and Future Prospects 107–116Tholey-Theley, GermanyInternational Federation of Organic Agriculture MovementsGoogle Scholar
24 Anonymous. (2002) More Washington organic. The Grocer 225: 7584 109Google Scholar
25Fetter, T.J., Caswell, J.A. (2002) Variation in organic standards prior to the National Organic Program. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17: 2 55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Baker, B.P., Benbrook, C.M., Groth, E. III, Benbrook, K.L. (2002) Pesticide residues in conventional, integrated pest management (IPM)-grown and organic foods: Insights from three US data sets. Food Additives and Contaminants 19: 5 427–446Google Scholar
27 Anonymous. (1998) Source of DPA residues on organic fruit unknown. Good Fruit Grower 49(8): 34Google Scholar
28Bramlage, W.J., Potter, T.L., Ju, Z. (1996) Detection of diphenylamine on surfaces of nontreated apples (Malus domestica Borkh). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44(5): 1348–1351Google Scholar
29USDA-FAS. 2003. Timeline of organic milestones. Available at Web site http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/agexporter/2000/june/timeline.htm (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agriculture Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30USDA-AMS. 2002. Program standards. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/standards.html (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, The National Organic Program, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
31Cruxefix, D., Blake, F. (2000) International legislation and importation. In Wright, S., McCrea, D. (eds). Handbook of Organic Food Processing and Production 2nd ed 9–50Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
32USDA-AMS. 2004. Accredited certifying agents. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/CertifyingAgents/Accredited.html (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, The National Organic Program, Washington DC.Google Scholar
33USDA-AMS. 2002. Labeling and marketing information. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/FactSheets/LabelingE.html (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, The National Organic Program, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
34USDA-AMS. 2002. Questions and Answers. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/Q&A.html#Certification (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, The National Organic Program, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
35USDA-FAS. 2003. European action plan for organic food and farming. Global Agriculture Information Network (GAIN) Report E23020. US Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
36EC 1788/2001. 2001. Available at Web site http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R1788&model=guichett (verified 13 January 2004).Google Scholar
37IFOAM. 2003. About IFOAM. Available at Web site http://www.ifoam.org (verified 16 January 2004). International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany.Google Scholar
38Codex Alimentarius Commission. 1999. Production, Processing, labelling and marketing of organically produced foods. Available at Web site http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/more_info.jsp?id_sta=360 (verified 13 January 2004). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
39International Organization for Standardization. 1996. ISO 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems. Available at Web site http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=26796&ICS1=3&ICS2=120&ICS3=20 (verified 13 January 2004). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
40EUREPGAP. 2004. The global partnership for safe and sustainable agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.eurogap.org/Languages/English/index_html (verified 9 April 2004).Google Scholar
41USDA-AMS. 2004. Imported organic agricultural products. Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/TradeIssues/importedorganic.html (verified 14 January 2004). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, The National Organic Program, Washington DC.Google Scholar
42Beecher, C. 2004. Washington organic crops in line to receive EU certification. Capitol Press Agricultural Newspaper, 16 January.Google Scholar
43OMRI. 2003. About OMRI. Available at Web site http://www.omri.org/OMRI_who.html (verified 14 December 2004). Organic Materials Research Institute, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
44OTA. 2002. Comparative analysis of the United States National Organic Program (7 CFR 205) and the European Union Organic Legislation (EEC 2092/91 and Amendments). Available at Web site http://www.ota.com/standards/other/eu_us.html (verified 14 December 2004). The Organic Trade Association, Greenfield, MA.Google Scholar
45Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Ekström, M.P., Shanahan, H. (2003) Food and life cycle inputs: Consequences of diet and ways to increase efficiency. Ecological Economics 44: 293–307Google Scholar
46Jones, A. (2002) An environmental assessment of food supply chains: a case study on dessert apples. Environmental Management 30(4):560–576Google Scholar