Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:17:57.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of conservation practices by women farmers in the Northeastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2012

Mary Barbercheck ,
Kathryn Brasier ,
Nancy Ellen Kiernan ,
Carolyn Sachs  and
Amy Trauger
Mary Barbercheck*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Kathryn Brasier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Nancy Ellen Kiernan
Affiliation:
Cooperative Extension Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Carolyn Sachs
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Amy Trauger
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania Women's Agricultural Network, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
*
* Corresponding author: meb34@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women are the fastest growing segment of farm operators in the United States, comprising approximately 14% of principal operators and 30% of all operators of the nation's 2.2 million farms. Although several studies have examined the adoption of conservation practices by farmers, no study of which we are aware has focused on the use of conservation practices among women farmers in the US. Therefore, in 2008, we conducted a survey of women farmers in the Northeast US to better understand their use of conservation practices, and how their use is affected by demographic and farm characteristics, and membership in agricultural organizations and networks. We examined the practices related to the type of agricultural organizations, including commodity producer organizations, general farm organizations, women's groups associated with general farm or commodity organizations, farm women's organizations, and sustainable/organic agriculture organizations. Over 85% of the 815 respondents belonged to at least one organization. The most common organizations reported were sustainable/organic agriculture organizations (53.5%) and general farm organizations (50.8%). About one-third of respondents belonged to commodity-based organizations. The states with organized women farmers' networks—Pennsylvania, Maine and Vermont—represented more than half of them. Members of women's and sustainable or organic agriculture organizations tended to be younger, have less farming experience, and to have received more formal agricultural education than did members of commodity-based, general farm and women's agricultural groups within general farm organizations. Our results indicate that organizational membership and participation provide critical networks that support and reinforce the use of conservation practices. Some practices were positively associated with one type of organization while negatively associated with others. For example, compost production/application, crop rotation, manure incorporation, and organic crop and livestock production are more likely among members of sustainable/organic agriculture organizations, but less likely among members of general farm organizations. The converse is true for integrated pest management (IPM) on crop farms. Specific conservation practices had unique sets of variables linked to their use, with farm products being the most frequent predictors. This research serves as a baseline to understand the array of conservation practices used by women farmers in the Northeast US, and some factors associated with their use. The results suggest the need for consideration of the applicability of existing adoption models for women farmers. As women tend to have diversified operations with multiple markets, educational and regulatory programs that attempt to reach women farmers may need to consider the specific types of farms they operate to best match practices to their situations and goals.

Keywords

women farmersconservation practices and structuresenvironmental sustainabilityagricultural organizationswomen's agricultural networks
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 65 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Batie, S.S. 2003. The multifunctional attributes of Northeastern agriculture: A research agenda. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32:1–8.Google Scholar
2 Follett, R.F., Shafer, S.R., Jawson, M.D., and Franzluebbers, A.J. 2005. Research and implementation needs to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in the USA. Soil and Tillage Research 83:159–166.Google Scholar
3 McCarl, B.A. and Schneider, U.A. 2000. U.S. agriculture's role in a greenhouse gas emission mitigation world: An economic perspective. Review of Agricultural Economics 22:134–159.Google Scholar
4 Robertson, G.P., Broome, J.C., Chonesky, E.A., Frankenberger, J.R., Johnson, P., Lipson, M., Miranowski, J.A., Owens, E.D., Pimentel, D., and Thrupp, L.A. 2004. Rethinking the vision for environmental research in US agriculture. BioScience 54:61–65.Google Scholar
5 Shennan, C. 2008. Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:717–739.Google Scholar
6 Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Klotthor-Weinkauf, D., and Baumgart-Getz, A. 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63:300–311.Google Scholar
7 USDA. 2007. 2007 Census Report. United States Department of Agriculture, Census of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at Web site http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/index.asp (retrieved April 10, 2012).Google Scholar
8 USDA. Undated. Small and Home-based Business: Women in Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/economics/in_focus/small_business_if_women.html (retrieved April 10, 2011).Google Scholar
9 Fink, D. 1986. Open Country, Iowa: Rural Women, Tradition and Change. State University of New York, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
10 Jellison, K. 1993. Entitled to Power: Farm Women and Technology, 1913–1963. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
11 Neth, M. 1995. Preserving the Family Farm: Women, Community and the Foundations of Agribusiness in the Midwest, 1900–1940. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
12 Sachs, C.E. 1983. The Invisible Farmers. Rowan and Ellanheld, Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
13 Shortall, S. 1999. Women and Farming: Property and Power. St. Martins Press, New York.Google Scholar
14 Whatmore, S. 1991. Farming Women: Gender, Work, and Family Enterprise. Macmillan Academic and Professional, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Findeis, J.L., Vandeman, A.M., Larson, J.M., and Runyan, J.L. 2002. The Dynamics of Hired Farm Labor: Constraints and Community Responses. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
16 Smith, L.A. 2008. From Cowbelles to WAgNs: Factors that have influenced the creation of women initiated agriculture organizations in the United States. Masters thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Penn State University. Available at Web site http://etda.libraries.psu.edu/theses/approved/WorldWideIndex/ETD-3107/index.html (accessed November 7, 2012).Google Scholar
17 Barbercheck, M., Brasier, K., Kiernan, N.E., Sachs, C., Trauger, A., Findeis, J., Stone, A., and Moist, L. 2009. Meeting the extension needs of women farmers: A perspective from Pennsylvania. Journal of Extension [On-line] 47(3):Article 3FEA8. Available at Web site http://www.joe.org/joe/2009june/a8.php Google Scholar
18 Brasier, K., Barbercheck, M., Kiernan, N.E., Sachs, C., Schwartzberg, A., and Trauger, A. 2009. Extension educators’ perceptions of the educational needs of women farmers in Pennsylvania. Journal of Extension [On-line] 47(3):Article 3FEA9. Available at Web site http://www.joe.org/joe/2009june/a9.php Google Scholar
19 Hassanein, N. 1999. Changing the Way America Farms: Knowledge and Community in the Sustainable Agriculture Movement. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
20 Sachs, C. 1996. Gendered Fields: Women, Agriculture, Environment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
21 Watkins, B. and Rothchild, N. 1996. In the Company of Women: Voices from the Women's Movement. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
22 Murdoch, J. 2000. Networks—a new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 16:407–419.Google Scholar
23 Trauger, A., Sachs, C., Barbercheck, M., Brasier, K., Kiernan, N.E., and Findeis, J. 2008. Agricultural education: Gender identity and knowledge exchange. Journal of Rural Studies 24:432–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Trauger, A., Sachs, C., Barbercheck, M., Kiernan, N.E., Brasier, K., and Schwartzberg, A. 2010. The Object of Extension: Agricultural education and authentic farmers in Pennsylvania. Sociologia Ruralis 50:85–103.Google Scholar
25 Agunga, R. and Igodan, C.C. 2007. Organic farmers' need for and attitude towards extension. Journal of Extension [On-line] 45:6FEA6. Available at Web site http://www.joe.org/joe/2007december/a6.php (retrieved March 25, 2012).Google Scholar
26 Beus, C.E. and Dunlap, R.E. 1992. The alternative-conventional agriculture debate: Where do agricultural faculty stand? Rural Sociology 57:363–380.Google Scholar
27 Carolan, M.S. 2006. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agriculture and Human Values 23:325–339.Google Scholar
28 Harp, A. and Sachs, C. 1992. Public agricultural researchers: Reactions to organic, low input and sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 9:58–63.Google Scholar
29 Heckman, J. 2006. A History of organic farming—Transitions from Sir Albert Howard's war in the soil to the USDA National Organic Program. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Kloppenburg, J. 1991. Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture. Rural Sociology 56:519–548.Google Scholar
31 Treadwell, D.D., McKinney, D.E., and Creamer, N.G. 2003. From philosophy to science: A brief history of organic horticulture in the United States. HortScience 38:1009–1013.Google Scholar
32 Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B. 2007. Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25–48.Google Scholar
33 Ahnström, J., Höckert, J., Bergeå, H.L., Francis, C.A., Skelton, P., and Hallgren, L. 2008. Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24:28–47.Google Scholar
34 Chouinard, H.H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, P.R., and Ohler, A.M. 2008. Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics 84:66–82.Google Scholar
35 Prokopy, L.S. 2008. Understanding farmer adoption of agricultural best management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2008 63:169A.Google Scholar
36 Rodriguez, J.M., Molnar, J.J., Fazio, R.A., Snydor, E., and Lowe, M.J. 2008. Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture perspectives: Change agent perspectives. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24:60–71.Google Scholar
37 Traoré, N., Landry, R., and Amara, N. 1998. On-farm adoption of conservation practices: The role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics 74:114–127.Google Scholar
38 Habron, G. 2004. Adoption of conservation practices by agricultural landowners in three Oregon watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59:109–115.Google Scholar
39 Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. Free Press, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
40 Smit, B. and Smithers, J. 1992. Adoption of soil conservation practices: An empirical analysis in Ontario, Canada. Land Degradation and Development 3:1–14.Google Scholar
41 Caswell, M., Fuglie, K.O., Ingram, C., Jans, S., and Kascak, C. 2001. Adoption of agricultural production practices: Lessons learned from the US Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project, edited by ERS Resource Economics Division: USDA. Publication No. AER792. 6 pp. Available at Web site http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/33985.html (accessed November 7, 2012).Google Scholar
42 Daberkow, S.G. and McBride, W.D. 2003. Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US. Precision Agriculture 4:163–177.Google Scholar
43 Gould, B.W., Saupe, W.E., and Klemme, R.M. 1989. Conservation tillage: The role of farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion. Land Economics 65:167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Nowak, P.J., Korsching, P.F., Wagener, D.G., and Hoban, T.J. 1984. Sociological Factors in the Adoption of Best Management Practices. Project Summary. PB 84–170836, May 1984. USEPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
45 Park, T.A. and Lohr, L. 2005. Organic pest management decisions: A systems approach to technology adoption. Agricultural Economics 33:467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Rahelizatavo, N.C. and Gillespie, J.M. 2004. The adoption of best management practices by Louisiana dairy producers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36:229–240.Google Scholar
47 Pretty, J. and Ward, H. 2001. Social capital and the environment. World Development 29:209–227.Google Scholar
48 Toderi, M., Powell, N., Seddaiu, G., Roggero, P.P., and Gibbon, D. 2007. Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution. Environmental Science and Policy 10:551–563.Google Scholar
49 Morton, L.W. 2008. The role of civic structure in achieving performance-based watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 21:751–766.Google Scholar
50 Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D. 2000. Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82:993–1005.Google Scholar
51 Burton, M., Rigby, D. and Young, T. 1999. Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50:47–63.Google Scholar
52 Hassanein, N. 1997. Networking knowledge in the sustainable agriculture movement: Some implications of the gender dimension. Society and Natural Resources 10:251–257.Google Scholar
53 Lockie, S. 2006. Networks of agri-environmental action: Temporality, spatiality and identity in agricultural environments. Sociologia Ruralis 46:22–39.Google Scholar
54 Ryan, B. and Gross, N.C. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology 8:15–24.Google Scholar
55 Butler, A., Le Grice, P., and Reed, M. 2006. Delimiting knowledge transfer from training. Education + Training 48:627–641.Google Scholar
56 Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.Google Scholar
57 Saltiel, J., Bander, J.W., and Palakovich, S. 1994. Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Diffusion, farm structure and profitability. Rural Sociology 59:333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Warriner, G.K. and Moul, T.M. 1992. Kinship and personal communication network influences on the adoption of agriculture conservation technology. Journal of Rural Studies 8:279–291.Google Scholar
59 Jordan, N., Becker, R., Gunsolus, J., White, S., and Damme, S. 2003. Knowledge networks: An avenue to ecological management of invasive weeds. Weed Science 51:271–277.Google Scholar
60 Lubell, M. and Fulton, A. 2007. Local diffusion networks as pathways to sustainable agriculture. California Agriculture 61:131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Trauger, A. 2005. Social, economic and environmental justice: A network analysis of sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania. Master's thesis, Penn State University.Google Scholar
62 Coughenour, M.C. 2003. Innovating conservation agriculture: The case of no-till cropping. Rural Sociology 68:278–304.Google Scholar
63 Wright Morton, L. and McGuire, J. 2011. Getting to performance-based outcomes at the watershed level. In Morton, L. Wright and Brown, S.S. (eds). Pathways for Getting to Better Water Quality: The Citizen Effect. Springer, New York. p. 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64 Kroma, M.M. 2006. Organic farmer networks: Facilitating learning and innovation for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28:5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65 Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
66 Carolan, M.S. 2008. Democratizing knowledge: Sustainable and conventional agricultural field days as divergent democratic forms. Science, Technology and Human Values 33:508–528.Google Scholar
67 Spector, P.E. 1992. Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-082. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
68 Norusis, M.J. 1990. SPSS Introductory Statistics Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
69 Pampel, F.C. 2000. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-132. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70 Hodgson, J. and Illius, A.W. (eds) 1996. The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
71 Beetz, A. and Rinehart, L. 2010. Rotational Grazing. NCAT Publication No. IP086. Available at Web site https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=245 (accessed November 7, 2012).Google Scholar
72 Clark, A. (ed.) 2007. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd ed. Handbook Series Book 9. SARE Outreach, Beltsville, MD.Google Scholar
73 Hoppe, R.A., Korb, P., O'Donoghue, E.J., and Banker, D.E. 2007. Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report, 2007. USDA Economic Research Service Bulletin Number 24, June 2007. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib24.aspx (accessed November 7, 2012).Google Scholar
74 Barbercheck, M.E. and Zaborski, E. 2010. Insect pest management: Differences between conventional and organic farming systems. Extension Article No. 19915. Available at Web site http://www.extension.org/pages/19915/insect-pest-management:-differences-between-conventional-and-organic-farming-systems (retrieved April 12, 2012).Google Scholar
75 Stephenson, G. 2003. The somewhat flawed theoretical foundation of the extension service. Journal of Extension [On-line] 41:4FEA1. Available from Web site http://www.joe.org/joe/2003august/a1.php Google Scholar
76 Wells, B. and Eells, J. 2011. One size does not fit all: Customizing conservation to a changing demographic. Journal of Soil and Water 66:136A–139A.Google Scholar