Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:41:49.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wine consumers’ reaction to prices, organic production and origins at the point of sale: an analysis of household panel data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Isabel Schäufele*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Food and Agricultural Marketing, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, D-37213Witzenhausen, Germany
Ulrich Hamm
Affiliation:
Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Food and Agricultural Marketing, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, D-37213Witzenhausen, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Isabel Schäufele, E-mail: i.schaeufele@uni-kassel.de

Abstract

Price premiums are considered as major purchase barriers for organic products and therefore may prevent organic market growth. For wine, however, prices take a double and conflicting effect: they also serve as quality signal for consumers. Therefore, it is of high relevance to examine if price is a major barrier for organic wine as well.

Even though many studies already examined price behavior for organic wine through surveys and experiments, it is still to be clarified how consumers’ react to price changes in a real market context. So far, no study analyzed consumer preferences for organic labeled wine in daily shopping situations. Through the analysis of the GfK household panel—a high-frequency data set of extensive population coverage—implications for price setting and price promotions in different market segments can be given.

In contrast to previous studies, consumers’ overall price sensitivity was found to be low for organic wine and consumers’ preferred organic over conventional wine. The effect of price as quality cue or purchase barrier and the effect of an organic label on consumers’ behavior varied between price categories. Organic wine was valued highest in the low-price category, whereas no price premium for the organic label was examined in the high-price segment. Price sensitivity was extremely high for organic wine in the low-price segment, while price functioned as quality signal in the premium segment for organic and conventional wine similarly.

This study verified previous stated preference studies on organic wine through the analysis of actual purchase data. Moreover, new insights for price setting in different price categories were generated through the examination of a large amount of disaggregated data on single consumer purchases.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraben, LA, Grogan, KA and Gao, Z (2017) Organic price premium or penalty? A comparative market analysis of organic wines from Tuscany. Food Policy 69, 154165.10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akaichi, F and Revoredo-Giha, C (2016) Consumers demand for products with animal welfare attributes. Evidence from homescan data for Scotland. British Food Journal 118, 16821711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alviola, PA and Capps, O (2010) Household demand analysis of organic and conventional fluid milk in the United States based on the 2004 Nielsen Homescan panel. Agribusiness 26, 369388.Google Scholar
Anders, S and Moeser, A (2008) Assessing the demand for value-based organic meats in Canada. A combined retail and household scanner-data approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies 32, 457469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankamah-Yeboah, I, Nielsen, M and Nielsen, R (2016) Price premium of organic salmon in Danish retail sale. Ecological Economics 122, 5460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49, 431434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschemann-Witzel, J and Niebuhr Aagaard, EM (2014) Elaborating on the attitude–behaviour gap regarding organic products: young Danish consumers and in-store food choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38, 550558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschemann-Witzel, J and Zielke, S (2017) Can't buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs 51, 211251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ay, J-S, Chakir, R and Marette, S (2014) Does living close to a vineyard increase the willingness-to-pay for organic and local wine? Paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress ‘Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies’. Ljubljana, Slovenia, August 26–29, 2014. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/183075 (accessed 18 February 2016).Google Scholar
Bazoche, P, Deola, C and Soler, LG (2008) An experimental study of wine consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. Paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE International Congress. Ghent, Belgium, August 26–29, 2008. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/43651 (accessed 18 February 2016).Google Scholar
Bazoche, P, Issanchou, S, Brouard, J, Maratray, J and Ginon, E (2015) Evaluating consumers’ sustainable choice of wine: a virtual shop experiment. In: 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar. Naples, Italy, March 25–27, 2015. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/202735 (accessed 22 March 2016).Google Scholar
Bernabéu, R, Brugarolas, M, Martínez-Carrasco, L and Díaz, M (2008) Wine origin and organic elaboration, differentiating strategies in traditional producing countries. British Food Journal 110, 174188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezawada, R and Pauwels, K (2013) What is special about marketing organic products? How organic assortment, price, and promotions drive retailer performance. Journal of Marketing 77, 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonn, MA, Cronin, JJ and Cho, M (2016) Do environmental sustainable practices of organic wine suppliers affect consumers behavioral intentions? The moderating role of trust. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 57, 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugarolas, M, Martinez-Carrasco Martinez, L, Bernabéu, R and Martinez-Poveda, A (2010) A contingent valuation analysis to determine profitability of establishing local organic wine markets in Spain. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25, 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cembalo, L, Caracciolo, F and Pomarici, E (2014) Drinking cheaply. The demand for basic wine in Italy. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 58, 374391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiodo, E, Casolani, N and Fantini, A (2011) Evaluation of the effects of changes in regulatory policies on consumers perception: The case of designations of origin in the wine common market organisation. Paper prepared for the EAAE 122nd Seminar. Ancona, Italy, February 17–18, 2011. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/99590 (accessed 18 February 2016).Google Scholar
Cornelsen, L, Mazzocchi, M, Green, R, Dangour, AD and Smith, RD (2016) Estimating the relationship between food prices and food consumption—methods matter. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 38, 546561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi, AM, Mueller, S and Lockshin, L (2012) Let's see what they have. What consumers look for in a restaurant wine list. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 53, 110121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanigro, M and McCluskey, JJ (2012) Hedonic price analysis in food markets. In Lusk, JL, Roosen, J and Shogren, JF (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 152180.Google Scholar
Costanigro, M, McCluskey, JJ and Mittelhammer, RC (2007) Segmenting the wine market based on price. Hedonic regression when different prices mean different products. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, 454466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amico, M, Di Vita, G and Monaco, L (2016) Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. Journal of Cleaner Production 120, 6471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, MA and Grant, LE (2008) Eco-labeling strategies: the eco-premium puzzle in the wine industry. American Association of Wine Economists, Working Papers No. 13. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/37325 (accessed 30 January 2017).Google Scholar
Delmas, MA and Lessem, N (2017) Eco-premium or eco-penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market. Business & Society 56, 318356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, CA, Pardoe, I and Vega-H, E (2004) A methodology for evaluating how product characteristics impact choice in retail settings with many zero observations. An application to restaurant wine purchase. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29, 112131.Google Scholar
Fogarty, J (2009) The demand for beer, wine and spirits. A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 16, 531.Google Scholar
Fourmouzi, V, Genius, M and Midmore, P (2012) The demand for organic and conventional produce in London, UK. A system approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 63, 677693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallet, CA (2007) The demand for alcohol. A meta-analysis of elasticities. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51, 121135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, LK and Thompson, GD (2000) Demand for organic and conventional beverage milk. Paper presented at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings. Vancouver, British Columbia, June 29-July 1, 2000. Available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/36346/1/sp00gl01.pdf (accessed 19 December 2017).Google Scholar
Grebitus, C, Lusk, JL and Nayga, RM (2013) Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecological Economics 88, 6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero-López, CM, Unar-Munguía, M and Colchero, MA (2017) Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile. BMC public health 17, 180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvorsen, R and Palmquist, R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 70, 474475.Google Scholar
Hollebeek, LD, Jaeger, SR, Brodie, RJ and Balemi, A (2007) The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference 18, 10331049.10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, C (2007) Analysis of Panel Data, 28th Edn. Econometric Society Monographs, Vol. 34. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, [u.a.].Google Scholar
Huang, CL and Lin, B-H (2007) A hedonic analysis of fresh tomato prices among regional markets. Review of Agricultural Economics 29, 783800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H, Livingston, M, Room, R and Callinan, S (2016) Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks. A Tobit analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 163, 222228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R, Stafford, J, Pierce, H and Daube, M (2017) Alcohol promotions in Australian supermarket catalogues. Drug and Alcohol Review 36, 456463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasteridis, P and Yen, ST (2012) U.S. Demand for organic and conventional vegetables. A Bayesian censored system approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 56, 405425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H and Bonn, MA (2015) The moderating effects of overall and organic wine knowledge on consumer behavioral intention. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 15, 295310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwong, LMK, Cyr, D, Kushner, J and Ogwang, T (2011) A semiparametric hedonic pricing model of Ontario wines. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 59, 361381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, GW and Suvannunt, V (1976) A model of consumer goods characteristics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, 504510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74, 132157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B-H, Smith, TA and Huang, CL (2008) Organic premiums of US fresh produce. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23, 208216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B-H, Yen, ST, Huang, CL and Smith, TA (2009) U.S. Demand for organic and conventional fresh fruits. The roles of income and price. Sustainability 1, 464478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockshin, L and Corsi, AM (2012) Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: a review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Economics and Policy 1, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockshin, L, Jarvis, W, d'Hauteville, F and Perrouty, J-P (2006) Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 17, 166178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludbrook, A, Holmes, J and Stockwell, T (2014) Gender differences in alcohol demand. A systematic review of the role of prices and taxes. Comment on conclusions by Nelson. Health Economics 23, 12811283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, J (2004) Demand for domestic and imported table wine in British Columbia: a source-differentiated almost ideal demand system approach. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52, 183199.Google Scholar
Malasevska, I and Haugom, E (2018) Optimal prices for alpine ski passes. Tourism Management 64, 291302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S, Ferjani, A and Reissig, L (2012) What matters to consumers of organic wine? British Food Journal 114, 272284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, KC, Sprott, DE and Miyazaki, AD (2003) Unit price usage knowledge. Journal of Business Research 56, 367377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, L, Chrysochou, P, Krystallis, A and Thøgersen, J (2014) The role of price as a product attribute in the organic food context. An exploration based on actual purchase data. Food Quality and Preference 37, 5260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Y, Brennan, A, Purshouse, R, Hill-McManus, D, Angus, C, Holmes, J and Meier, PS (2014) Estimation of own and cross price elasticities of alcohol demand in the UK—a pseudo-panel approach using the Living Costs and Food Survey 2001–2009. Journal of Health Economics 34, 96103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, V-W, Lennard, D and McGoldrick, P (2003) Consumer awareness, understanding and usage of unit pricing. British Journal of Management 14, 173187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizdrak, A, Scarborough, P, Waterlander, WE and Rayner, M (2015) Differential responses to food price changes by personal characteristic. A systematic review of experimental studies. PLoS ONE 10, e0130320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, S, Lockshin, L, Saltman, Y and Blanford, J (2010 a) Message on a bottle. The relative influence of wine back label information on wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 21, 2232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, S, Osidacz, P, Francis, IL and Lockshin, L (2010 b) Combining discrete choice and informed sensory testing in a two-stage process. Can it predict wine market share? Food Quality and Preference 21, 741754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, T, Balasubramanian, SA and Kasilingam, DL (2017) Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 37, 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngobo, PV (2011) What drives household choice of organic products in grocery stores? Journal of Retailing 87, 90100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, E and Doucouliagos, H (2014) Wine prices and quality ratings: a meta-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97, 103121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliarini, E, Laureati, M and Gaeta, D (2013) Sensory descriptors, hedonic perception and consumer's attitudes to Sangiovese red wine deriving from organically and conventionally grown grapes. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palma, D, Ortúzar, JdD, Rizzi, LI, Guevara, CA, Casaubon, G and Ma, H (2016) Modelling choice when price is a cue for quality. A case study with Chinese consumers. Journal of Choice Modelling 19(Suppl. C), 2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, D, Henryks, J and Jones, H (2011) Organic food. What we know (and do not know) about consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26, 171177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plassmann, H, O'Doherty, J, Shiv, B and Rangel, A (2008) Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 10501054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, C, Elliott, G and Flynn, M (2010) Buying wine on promotion is trading-up in UK supermarkets. International Journal of Wine Business Research 22, 102121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödiger, M and Hamm, U (2015) How are organic food prices affecting consumer behaviour? A review. Food Quality and Preference 43, 1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82, 3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäufele, I and Hamm, U (2017) Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 147, 379394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäufele, I, Herrmann, R and Szolnoki, G (2016) Erzielen Weine mit höherer Qualität höhere Preise? Eine hedonische Preisanalyse zur DLG-Bundesweinprämierung (Do high-quality wines capture higher prices? A hedonic price analysis on DLG quality tests). German Journal of Agricultural Economics 65, 132150.Google Scholar
Schmidt, L, Skvortsova, V, Kullen, C, Weber, B and Plassmann, H (2017) How context alters value. The brain's valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness. Scientific Reports 7, 8098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmit, TM, Rickard, BJ and Taber, J (2013) Consumer valuation of environmentally friendly production practices in wines, considering asymmetric information and sensory effects. Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 483504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröck, R (2012) The organic milk market in Germany is maturing: a demand system analysis of organic and conventional fresh milk segmented by consumer groups. Agribusiness 28, 274292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröck, R (2013) Quality and endogeneity issues in demand systems. A comparative estimation of price and expenditure elasticities of the demand for organic and conventional vegetables in Germany. German Journal of Agricultural Economics 62, 1838.Google Scholar
Sharma, A, Sinha, K and Vandenberg, B (2017) Pricing as a means of controlling alcohol consumption. British Medical Bulletin 123, 149158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, TA, Huang, CL and Lin, B-H (2009) Estimating organic premiums in the US fluid milk market. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24, 197204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soosay, C, Fearne, A and Dent, B (2012) Sustainable value chain analysis—a case study of Oxford Landing from ‘vine to dine’. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17, 6877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, M (2012) A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 4th Edn. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, AC, Salois, MJ and Komro, KA (2009) Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking. A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 104, 179190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldrop, ME, McCluskey, JJ and Mittelhammer, RC (2017) Products with multiple certifications. Insights from the US wine market. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44, 658682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48, 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, K-P, Hennigs, N, Behrens, SH and Klarmann, C (2014) Tasting green: an experimental design for investigating consumer perception of organic wine. British Food Journal 116, 197211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wier, M, O'Doherty Jensen, K, Andersen, LM and Millock, K (2008) The character of demand in mature organic food markets: great Britain and Denmark compared. Food Policy 33, 406421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J (2013) Introductory Econometrics A Modern Approach, 5th Edn. Melbourne: South-Western.Google Scholar
Zhang, F, Huang, CL, Lin, B-H, Epperson, JE and Houston, JE (2011) National demand for fresh organic and conventional vegetables. Scanner data evidence. Journal of Food Products Marketing 17, 441458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar