Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:21:43.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China's Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of ‘Civilization’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Yongjin Zhang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the major themes explored by the late Hedley Bull and others in their studies of the expansion of the European society of states across the globe is the entry of extra-European states into that society. It has given rise to two challenging and inescapable questions: when was each extra-European state drawn and accepted into the expanding European international society, and how? The answers to these questions are central to understanding when and how the contemporary global society which embraces states belonging to every culture and civilization emerged. Research in this area also raises questions about the future of the now universal international society. Can a global society of states devoid of cultural homogeneity survive? If so, how? Will the acceptance of common rules and institutions foster the perception of common interests by states of different cultural systems? Or conversely, will the perception of common interests move member states to work out new rules, institutions, and values to cement the structure of a universal international society? The inquiry into the historical process in which an extra-European state was drawn into the expanding international society cannot provide answers to these questions. Historical illumination is only capable of suggesting the direction in which those answers can be productively sought.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 3 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Don Markwell for his help during the preparation of this essay. I am also grateful to John Vincent and the other two anonymous referees for their helpful comments made on an earlier draft of this essay.

References

1 See two principal works in this field: Bull, H. and Watson, A. (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar, and Gong, G., The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar

2 Bull, H., The Anarchical Society (London, 1977), p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Bull, and Watson, (eds.) The Expansion of International Society, p. 1.Google Scholar

4 Hsu, , China's Entrance into the Family of Nations – The Diplomatic Phase, 1860–1880 (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 More significant in our context is that in 1878 China was invited to attend the sixth meeting of the Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Guo Songtao, Chinese Minister in London attended the meeting as the Chinese representative and spoke of improving the law of nations ‘for the benefit of all governments and peoples’. He also explained that China had not completely subscribed to the rules of international law because of its different cultural and political background. See Hsu, , China's Entrance into the Family of Nations, p. 207.Google Scholar

6 It was followed by the Chinese Legation in Germany in the same year, in the United States and France in 1878, in Russia and Spain in 1879, and in Peru in 1880.

7 Holland, T. E., Studies in International Law (Oxford, 1898), p. 115).Google Scholar

8 Watson, A., ‘Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Society’, Review of International Studies, 13, no. 2 (1987), p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Wilson, G., Handbook of International Law, 2nd edn (Minnesota, 1927), p. 25.Google Scholar

10 Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

11 See Gong, , The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society.Google Scholar

12 Gong, , The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, p. xi.Google Scholar

13 See Gong, , The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, pp. 195–200 and 237.Google Scholar

14 Gong, G., ‘China's Entry into International Society’, in Bull, and Watson, (eds.), The Expansion of International Society, p. 183.Google Scholar

15 Oppenheim, L., International Law, 5th edn by Lauterpacht, H. (London, 1937), p. 46.Google Scholar

16 Wight, M., Systems of States, ed. Bull, H. (Leicester, 1977), p. 116.Google Scholar

17 Holland, T. E., Lectures of International Law, eds , T. A. and Walker, W. L. (London, 1933), p. 39.Google Scholar

18 Fishel, W. R., The End of Extraterritoriality in China (Berkeley, 1952), p. 1.Google Scholar

19 See Thomas, E. D., Foreword in Fishel, The End of Extraterritoriality in China, p. vi.Google Scholar

20 See, for example, Teng, S.-Y. and Fairbank, J. K., China's Response to the West, pt 6Google Scholar, ‘Reform and Revolution, 1901–1912’, pp. 195–230; Hsu, I., The Rise of Modern China (New York, 1983), pt IVGoogle Scholar, ‘Reform and Revolution 1898–1912’, pp. 355–492; Wright, M. (ed.), China in Revolution, The First Phase 1900–1913, ‘Introduction: The Rising Tide of Change’, (New Haven, 1968), pp. 1–63Google Scholar; and Young, E, ‘Nationalism, Reform and Republican Revolution in the Early Twentieth Century’, in Crowley, J. B. (ed.), Modem East Asia: Essays in Interpretation (New York, 1970), pp. 151–79.Google Scholar

21 Bull, H., ‘The Emergence of a Universal International Society’, in Bull, and Watson, (eds), The Expansion of International Society, p. 122.Google Scholar

22 Wright, (ed.), China in Revolution, p. 24.Google Scholar

23 For more details of Imperil China's administrative reform, see ‘Administrative Reform and the Central Power’, in Fairbank, J. K., Reischauer, E. O. and Craig, A. M., East Asia – The Modern Transformation (London, 1965), p. 622–5.Google Scholar

24 Wright, , China in Revolution, p. 28.Google Scholar

25 Young, E., ‘Nationalism, Reform and Republican Revolution in the Early Twentieth Century’Google Scholar, in Crowley, J. B. (ed.), Modern East Asia: Essays in Interpretation, p. 162.Google Scholar

26 Quoted in Wright, (ed.), China in Revolution, p. 69.Google Scholar

27 Young, in Crowley, (ed.), Modern East Asia: Essays in Interpretation, p. 154.Google Scholar

28 Young, in Crowley, (ed.), Modern East Asia: Essays in Interpretation, p. 156.Google Scholar

29 Wilson, , Handbook of International Law, p. 25.Google Scholar

30 Bull, , The Emergence of a Universal International Society’, p. 121.Google Scholar

31 See MacMurray, J. V. A., Treaties and Agreements with and Concerning China, 1894–1919, vol. 1 (Manchu Period 1894–1911) (New York, 1920), pp. 682–3.Google Scholar

32 Garner, J. W., Recent Developments in International Law (Calcutta, 1922), p. 25.Google Scholar

33 Gong, , The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, p. 85.Google Scholar

34 Gu Weijun Huiyilu (Memoir of Wellington Koo), vol. 1 (Beijing, 1983), p. 205.Google Scholar

35 China Yearbook, 1920–1921, p. 741.

36 Oppenheim, L., International Law, 4th edn by McNair, A. B. (London, 1928), p. 40.Google Scholar