Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:49:11.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imagining (in)security: NATO's collective self-defence and post-9/11 military policing in the Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2021

Julien Pomarède Open the ORCID record for Julien Pomarède [Opens in a new window]
Julien Pomarède*
Affiliation:
Recherche et Etudes en Politique Internationale (REPI), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. Email: julien.pomarede@ulb.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do scenarios of dangerous futures imagined in the framework of the post-9/11 counterterrorism shape security institutions? Critical Security Studies (CSS)'s dominant answer is that state apparatus are significantly transformed by the use of new technologies of prediction that are very prolific in imagining potential risks. The present article questions this technologically determinist thesis. Introducing the notion of weak field in the study of pre-emption, it argues that the political sociology of transnational fields of power can help us in historicise and assess more precisely the impact of imagination over power and control in the pre-emptive era. The article analyses NATO's reaction to 9/11 as a case study. It shows how the fabrication of potential terrorist threats by NATO's practitioners, that served to justify the pre-emptive use of the collective self-defence clause of the Washington Treaty (Article 5), evolved into an ambiguous support for NATO's military policing of the Mediterranean basin and into its involvement in migration control.

Keywords

Pre-emptionImaginationCritical Security StudiesNATOCounterterrorismTransnational Fields
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 192 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aradau, Claudia and van Munster, Rens, ‘Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:1 (2007), p. 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Goede, Marieke de, ‘Beyond risk: Premediation and the post-9/11 security imagination’, Security Dialogue, 39:2–3 (2008), p. 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goede, Marieke de, ‘The politics of preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, 14:1 (2008), p. 176CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Bigo, Didier, ‘Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of practices, practices of power’, International Political Sociology, 5:3 (2011), pp. 225–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Huysmans, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU (London: Routledge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Bonnelli, Laurent and Ragazzi, Francesco, ‘Low-tech security: Files, notes and memos as technologies of anticipation’, Security Dialogue, 45:5 (2014), p. 478Google Scholar.

5 Vauchez, Antoine, ‘The force of a weak field: Law and lawyers in the government of the European Union (for a renewed research agenda)’, International Political Sociology, 2:2 (2008), pp. 128–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vauchez, Antoine and Mudge, Stephanie Lee, ‘Building Europe on a weak field: Law, economics, and scholarly avatars in transnational politics’, American Journal of Sociology, 118:2 (2013), pp. 449–92Google Scholar.

6 Neocleous, Mark, ‘Air power as police power’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31:4 (2013), p. 588CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Holmqvist, Caroline, Bachman, Ian, and Bell, Colleen, ‘Introduction’, in Holmqvist, Caroline, Bachman, Ian, and Bell, Colleen (eds), War, Police and Assemblages of Intervention (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015), p. 6Google Scholar.

8 Coward, Martin, ‘The globalisation of enclosure: Interrogating the geopolitics of empire’, Third World Quarterly, 26:6 (2005), p. 860CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Amoore, Louise, The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security Beyond Probability (London: Duke University Press, 2013), p. 9Google Scholar.

10 Massumi, Brian, Ontopower: War, Powers, and the State of Perception (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015), p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Aradau, Claudia and Munster, Rens van, Politics of Catastrophe: Genealogies of the Unknown (Oxon: Routledge, 2011), p. 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Ibid., p. 80.

13 Goede, Marieke de and Randalls, Samuel, ‘Precaution, preemption: Arts and technologies of the actionable future’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27:5 (2009), p. 868CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Salter, Mark, ‘Imagining numbers: Risk, quantification, and aviation security’, Security Dialogue, 39:2–3 (2008), pp. 243–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 de Goede, ‘Beyond risk’, pp. 159–60.

15 Davidshofer, Stephan, Jeandesboz, Julien, and Ragazzi, Francesco, ‘Technology and security practices: Situating the technological imperative’, in Basaran, Tugba, Bigo, Didier, Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre, and Walker, Rob (eds), International Political Sociology: Transversal Lines (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 211–12Google Scholar.

16 Hudson, Peter, ‘The Renaissance at sea: A new era for maritime NATO’, The RUSI Journal, 159:3 (2014), pp. 24–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Barry Ryan, ‘A Mediterranean police assemblage’, in Holmqvist, Bachman, and Bell (eds), War, Police and Assemblages of Intervention, pp. 147–63.

18 After the Cold War, NATO has indeed developed a strong risk management component, especially through the out-of-area or non-Article 5 missions, such as the peacekeeping operations in the Balkans, the counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan, or the humanitarian bombings (Balkans, Libya). Wallender, Celeste, ‘Institutional assets and adaptability: NATO after the Cold War’, International Organization, 54:4 (2000), pp. 705–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keohane, Robert and Wallender, Celeste, ‘Risk, threat and security institutions’, in Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert, and Wallender, Celeste (eds), Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions Over Time and Space (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 21–47Google Scholar; Rasmussen, Mikkel Vedby, ‘Reflexive security: NATO and international risk society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30:2 (2001), pp. 285–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Taylor, Charles, Modern Social Imaginaries (London: Duke University Press, 2004), p. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries; Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London and New York: Verso, 2006)Google Scholar; Goff, Jacques Le, The Medieval Imagination (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

21 Appaturai, Arjun, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), p. 5Google Scholar.

22 Castoriadis, Cornelius, The Imaginary Institution of Society (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2005), pp. 355–6Google Scholar.

23 Aradau, Claudia and Munster, Rens van, ‘The time/space of preparedness: Anticipating the “next terrorist attack”’, Space and Culture, 15:2 (2012), pp. 98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Interview with Maritime security expert to NATO's Defence College, February 2017.

25 Ansart, Pierre, Idéologies, conflits et pouvoir (Paris: PUF, 1977), p. 29Google Scholar.

26 Bigo, ‘Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations’, p. 252.

27 Bonnelli and Ragazzi, ‘Low-tech security’, p. 479.

28 Vauchez, ‘The force of a weak field’; Vauchez and Lee Mudge, ‘Building Europe on a weak field’.

29 Bourdieu, Pierre, The Rules of the Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

30 Vauchez and Lee Mudge, ‘Building Europe on a weak field’, p. 457.

31 Hibou, Béatrice, The Political Anatomy of Domination (Paris: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017), p. 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Vauchez, ‘The force of a weak field’, p. 137.

33 Eyal, Gal, ‘Dangerous liaisons between military intelligence and Middle Eastern studies in Israel’, Theory and Society, 31:5 (2002), p. 657CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stampnitzky, Lisa, Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented ‘Terrorism (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Vauchez, ‘The force of a weak field’, p. 138.

35 Ibid., p. 136.

36 Battistelli, Fabrizio and Galantino, Maria Grazia, ‘Dangers, risks and threats: An alternative conceptualization to the catch-all concept of risk’, Current Sociology, 67:1 (2019), pp. 64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Stampnitzky, Disciplining Terror, pp. 7–13.

38 Bigo, ‘Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations’; Martin-Mazé, Médéric, ‘Returning struggles to the practice turn: How were Bourdieu and Boltanski lost in (some) translations and what to do about it’, International Political Sociology, 11:2 (2017), pp. 203–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Lisa Stampnitzky, ‘The politics of (anti-)knowledge: Disciplining terrorism after 9/11’, in Disciplining Terror, pp. 186–201.

40 Capoccia, Giovanni and Kelemen, R. Daniel, ‘The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism’, World Politics, 59:3 (2007), p. 348CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 1, April 2015.

42 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 2, May 2015.

43 Ibid.

44 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 5, June 2015.

45 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 2, May 2015.

46 Ibid.

47 Ibid.

48 Lord Robertson, ‘Déclaration à la presse du Secrétaire général sur la décision du Conseil de l'Atlantique Nord concernant l'application de l'article 5 du Traité de Washington en conséquence des attaques perpétrées le 11 septembre contre les États-Unis’ (2001), available at: {http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s011004c.html} accessed 3 March 2019.

49 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 7, July 2015.

50 Ibid.

51 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 9, July 2015; NATO, ‘Briefing: Combating Terrorism at Sea. Report’ (Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division, 2008). The USS Cole destroyer was bombed by Al-Qaeda in October 2000 in Yemen's Aden harbour.

52 Roberto Cesaretti, ‘Combatting terrorism in the Mediterranean’, NATO Review (2005), available at: {http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_21878.htm?selectedLocale=en} accessed 25 May 2019.

53 Interview with Maritime security expert to NATO's Defence College, February 2017.

54 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 9, July 2015.

55 The international law indeed stipulates that warships can board civil vessels suspected of terrorist activities in high seas only with the authorisation of the flag state. UN, Protocol of 2005 to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (New York, 2005).

56 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 2, May 2015; Richard Olson, ‘North Atlantic Council Readout – 7 November 2007’, Cable n°07USNATO601_a (2008), available at: {https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07USNATO601_a.html} accessed 8 March 2019.

57 Cesaretti, ‘Combatting terrorism in the Mediterranean’.

58 Interview with military officer No. 14, September 2015.

59 NATO, ‘Briefing: Combating Terrorism At Sea. Report’ (Brussels, 2006), p. 3.

60 Interview with military officer No. 13, July 2015.

61 Interview with diplomat No. 10, August 2015.

62 US Department of State, ‘The National Strategy for Maritime Security’ (Washington, DC, 2005).

63 Interview with civil adviser No. 1 to MARCOM, March 2017.

64 Interview with military officer No. 5, March 2015.

65 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 11, August 2015.

66 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 6, June 2015.

67 Cesaretti, ‘Combatting terrorism in the Mediterranean’.

68 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 8, July 2015.

69 Steve Helleur Dore and Chris Van Fong, ‘Scenario-Based Assessment of Sensors for the Canadian Recognized Maritime Picture’, 7th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Quebec, 16–20 September 2002.

70 Volpe Centre, ‘M.S.S.I.S. Maritime Safety & Security Information System’, available at: {https://mssis.volpe.dot.gov/Main/} accessed 12 July 2019.

71 Kitchin, Rob, The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences (London: Sage, 2014)Google Scholar.

72 NATO Review, ‘The God's Eye View: Operation Active Endeavour’ (2010), available at: {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJLZAMZzrkA} accessed 23 February 2019.

73 NATO Parliamentary Assembly, ‘158 DSC 08 E BIS – NATO Operations: Current Priorities and Lessons Learned’ (2008), § 102–03.

74 Interview with military officer No. 15, September 2015; ExactEarth, ‘ExactEarth Announces New Contract with NATO’ (2012), available at: {http://investors.exactearth.com/recent-news?item=144} accessed 28 February 2019; Davide Severino, ‘Sensors in NATO maritime situational awareness’, in Michele Vespe and Fabio Mazzarella (eds), Maritime Knowledge Discovery and Anomaly Detection Workshop (Ispra: European Commission, 2016); Gerald Eiden, ‘LuxSpace SAT: AIS Data Service Enhancing Maritime Safety and Security for European Institutional Users’, AIS Summit 2013, Hamburg, 8–9 May 2013.

75 Interview with military officer No. 12, June 2015.

76 ExactEarth, ‘ExactEarth Announces New Contract with NATO’; LuxSpace, ‘Global AIS Data Service LuxSpace Global AIS Data Service’, available at: {http://www.luxspace.lu/index.php/global-ais-data-service.html} accessed 24 June 2019.

77 Krahmann, Elke, ‘Beck and beyond: Selling security in the world risk society’, Review of International Studies, 37:1 (2011), pp. 349–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abrahamsen, Rita and Williams, Michael, ‘Security beyond the state: Global security assemblages in international politics’, International Political Sociology, 3:1 (2009), pp. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 8, July 2015; Arian Minderhoud, ‘Maritime Security Regime: Brief to MSR Roundtable’ (Northwood: MARCOM, 26 April 2016).

79 Interview with civil adviser No. 2 to MARCOM, February 2017; US Department Of Homeland Security, ‘National Plan to Achieve Maritime Domain Awareness for the National Security Strategy for Maritime Security’ (Washington, DC, 2005).

80 Bigo, Didier, ‘Internal and external aspects of security’, European Security, 15:4 (2006), pp. 385–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 NATO, ‘NATO Uncovers Immigrant Smuggling in Mediterranean’ (2006), available at: {https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/news_22358.htm?selectedLocale=en} accessed 4 October 2019.

82 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 8, July 2015.

83 Interview with civil adviser No. 2 to MARCOM, July 2017.

84 ACT, Multiple Futures Project: Navigating towards 2020. Final Report (Norfolk, 2009), p. 2. The existing maritime strategy dated from the Cold War (1984).

85 NATO, ‘Alliance Maritime Strategy’ (2011), available at: {http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_75615.html} accessed 1 July 2019.

86 Interview with civil adviser No. 2 to MARCOM, February 2017.

87 Interview with maritime security expert to NATO's Defense College, February 2017.

88 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 9, July 2015.

89 Interview with military officer No. 10, June 2015.

90 Interview with maritime security expert to NATO's Defence College, February 2017.

91 NATO, ‘Operation Sea Guardian’ (2018), available at: {https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/topics_136233.htm?selectedLocale=en} accessed 17 July 2019.

92 Interview with maritime security expert to NATO's Defence College, February 2017.

93 Interview with NATO international civil servant No. 11, August 2015.

94 Ibid.

95 A. G. Dibenetto, ‘Implementing the Alliance Maritime Strategy in the Mediterranean: NATO's Operation Sea Guardian’, research paper No. 134 (NATO Defense College, Rome, 2016), p. 12.

96 Interview with military officer No. 16 (October 2015); Jens Stoltenberg, ‘Press Conference by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg’ (2016), available at: {https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_132492.htm?selectedLocale=en} accessed 17 May 2019; SHADE-MED, ‘EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA SHADE MED Working Group. Report’ (OHQ Rome: 12–13 May 2016).

97 NATO, ‘NATO's Deployment in the Aegean Sea’.

98 NATO, ‘Joint Declaration by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’ (2016), available at: {https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/official_texts_133163.htm} accessed 15 May 2019.

99 Interview with diplomat No. 14, October 2015.

100 Garelli, Glenda and Tazzioli, Martina, ‘The biopolitical warfare on migrants: EU Naval Force and NATO operations of migration government in the Mediterranean’, Critical Military Studies, 4:2 (2018), pp. 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cuttita, Paolo, ‘Delocalization, humanitarianism, and human rights: The Mediterranean border between exclusion and inclusion’, Antipode, 50:2 (2017), pp. 783–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar.